Morbidity during hospitalization: Can we predict it?

Mary E. Charlson , Frederic L. Sax , C.Ronald Mackenzie, Robert L. Braham, Suzanne D. Fields , R.G. Douglas Jr
{"title":"Morbidity during hospitalization: Can we predict it?","authors":"Mary E. Charlson ,&nbsp;Frederic L. Sax ,&nbsp;C.Ronald Mackenzie,&nbsp;Robert L. Braham,&nbsp;Suzanne D. Fields ,&nbsp;R.G. Douglas Jr","doi":"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90107-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Physicians use the concept of stability to estimate the likelihood that a patient will deteriorate during a hospitalization. To determine whether physicians can accurately predict a patient's risk of morbidity, 603 patients admitted to the medical service during a one month period were rated prospectively as to how stable they were.</p><p>Overall, 15% of patients had deterioration of already compromised systems, while 17% had new complications, such as sepsis. Eight percent of patients had both. Twelve percent of stable patients experienced morbidity; 39% of the somewhat unstable and 61% of the most unstable. When all of the demographic and clinical variables were taken into account including the reason for admission and comorbid diseases, the residents' estimates of the patient's stability was the most significant predictor of morbidity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p><p>The judgment that a patient was stable had an 87% negative predictive accuracy, while the judgment unstable had a 46% positive predictive accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chronic diseases","volume":"40 7","pages":"Pages 705-712"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90107-X","citationCount":"165","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chronic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002196818790107X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 165

Abstract

Physicians use the concept of stability to estimate the likelihood that a patient will deteriorate during a hospitalization. To determine whether physicians can accurately predict a patient's risk of morbidity, 603 patients admitted to the medical service during a one month period were rated prospectively as to how stable they were.

Overall, 15% of patients had deterioration of already compromised systems, while 17% had new complications, such as sepsis. Eight percent of patients had both. Twelve percent of stable patients experienced morbidity; 39% of the somewhat unstable and 61% of the most unstable. When all of the demographic and clinical variables were taken into account including the reason for admission and comorbid diseases, the residents' estimates of the patient's stability was the most significant predictor of morbidity (p < 0.001).

The judgment that a patient was stable had an 87% negative predictive accuracy, while the judgment unstable had a 46% positive predictive accuracy.

住院期间的发病率:我们能预测吗?
医生使用稳定性的概念来估计病人在住院期间病情恶化的可能性。为了确定医生是否能准确地预测病人的发病风险,在一个月的时间里,603名在医疗服务部门就诊的病人被前瞻性地评估了他们的病情稳定程度。总体而言,15%的患者已经受损的系统恶化,而17%的患者出现新的并发症,如败血症。8%的患者两者都有。12%的稳定患者出现了发病;39%的人有点不稳定61%的人最不稳定。当考虑到所有的人口统计学和临床变量,包括入院原因和合并症时,居民对患者稳定性的估计是发病率的最重要预测因子(p <0.001)。对于病情稳定的判断,阴性预测准确率为87%,而对于病情不稳定的判断,阳性预测准确率为46%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信