Peer feedback in higher education: How students’ roles affect providing and receiving feedback

IF 2.6 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101408

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to explore the impact of different roles of feedback providers on their experience of providing feedback, as well as their influence on the feedback receivers’ responses to feedback. The students who performed the assignment (creating learning material) assumed the role of peer experts (N=22) in providing feedback. The other students (N=22) took on the role of peer users as they used the developed learning materials. The data on the students’ experiences were collected using the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. The response to feedback was explored via interviews with the peer experts. Findings indicate that the peer experts exhibited a higher sense of competence than the peer users. Their feedback was perceived as more clear, specific, and useful than that provided by the peer users. According to the Self-Determination Theory, we highlight the importance of different task design features for students’ sense of competence, relatedness, and autonomy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

高等教育中的同伴反馈：学生的角色如何影响反馈的提供和接收

在这项研究中，我们旨在探索反馈提供者的不同角色对其反馈经验的影响，以及他们对反馈接收者对反馈的反应的影响。完成作业（创建学习材料）的学生在提供反馈时扮演了同伴专家的角色（22 人）。其他学生（22 人）在使用开发的学习材料时则扮演同伴用户的角色。使用内在动机量表收集了学生的体验数据。通过对同伴专家的访谈，探讨了他们对反馈的反应。研究结果表明，同伴专家比同伴用户表现出更高的能力感。他们的反馈被认为比同伴用户提供的反馈更清晰、更具体、更有用。根据 "自我决定理论"，我们强调了不同任务设计特征对学生能力感、相关性和自主性的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studies in Educational Evaluation Multiple-

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

62 days

期刊介绍： Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.