A meta-analysis of pathogen reduction data in anaerobic digestion

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Laura Álvarez-Fraga , Gabriel Capson-Tojo , Malo Sanglier , Jérôme Hamelin , Renaud Escudié , Nathalie Wéry , Diana García-Bernet , Audrey Battimelli , Felipe Guilayn
{"title":"A meta-analysis of pathogen reduction data in anaerobic digestion","authors":"Laura Álvarez-Fraga ,&nbsp;Gabriel Capson-Tojo ,&nbsp;Malo Sanglier ,&nbsp;Jérôme Hamelin ,&nbsp;Renaud Escudié ,&nbsp;Nathalie Wéry ,&nbsp;Diana García-Bernet ,&nbsp;Audrey Battimelli ,&nbsp;Felipe Guilayn","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anaerobic digestion (AD)-derived digestate can be used as an organic fertilizer or for soil amendment. However, its utilization for resource recovery raises valid biosafety concerns. Despite extensive research on the capacity of AD for pathogen reduction, the variability in results poses challenges for drawing definitive conclusions. To address this lack of unification, results from 121 scientific articles were compiled, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted. Findings indicate that artificial pathogen spiking leads to performance overestimation. Current most common indicators represent accurately their respective microbial groups. <em>Clostridiaceae</em> are barely affected by AD and may be favored by some pre-treatment technologies. The impact of operational parameters and the coupling of pre- and post-treatments with AD on pathogen reduction was also investigated. While an optimal batch duration was identified, the hydraulic retention time in (semi)continuous systems did not affect the overall pathogen reduction. Heat-based post-treatments coupled with thermophilic AD resulted in the highest pathogen reductions, fulfilling legislations. Unprecedented statistical analyses allowed categorizing quantitatively key parameters. Results confirmed that temperature is the most relevant parameter. Thermophilic conditions resulted in the highest pathogen reductions, while psychrophilic and mesophilic temperatures showed similar performances. The impact of pH on pathogen removal was confirmed, with acidic and basic values enhancing pathogen reductions. More research considering all AD products within a multicriteria optimization approach (e.g., pathogen reduction, biogas production, and digestate quality) is needed to determine optimal conditions considering all aspects. This study provides novel and relevant conclusions for AD at research and industrial scale, drawing several R&amp;D perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD)-derived digestate can be used as an organic fertilizer or for soil amendment. However, its utilization for resource recovery raises valid biosafety concerns. Despite extensive research on the capacity of AD for pathogen reduction, the variability in results poses challenges for drawing definitive conclusions. To address this lack of unification, results from 121 scientific articles were compiled, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted. Findings indicate that artificial pathogen spiking leads to performance overestimation. Current most common indicators represent accurately their respective microbial groups. Clostridiaceae are barely affected by AD and may be favored by some pre-treatment technologies. The impact of operational parameters and the coupling of pre- and post-treatments with AD on pathogen reduction was also investigated. While an optimal batch duration was identified, the hydraulic retention time in (semi)continuous systems did not affect the overall pathogen reduction. Heat-based post-treatments coupled with thermophilic AD resulted in the highest pathogen reductions, fulfilling legislations. Unprecedented statistical analyses allowed categorizing quantitatively key parameters. Results confirmed that temperature is the most relevant parameter. Thermophilic conditions resulted in the highest pathogen reductions, while psychrophilic and mesophilic temperatures showed similar performances. The impact of pH on pathogen removal was confirmed, with acidic and basic values enhancing pathogen reductions. More research considering all AD products within a multicriteria optimization approach (e.g., pathogen reduction, biogas production, and digestate quality) is needed to determine optimal conditions considering all aspects. This study provides novel and relevant conclusions for AD at research and industrial scale, drawing several R&D perspectives.
厌氧消化中病原体减少数据的荟萃分析
厌氧消化(AD)产生的沼渣可用作有机肥料或土壤改良剂。然而,利用厌氧消化进行资源回收会引起生物安全方面的担忧。尽管对厌氧消化减少病原体的能力进行了广泛的研究,但研究结果的差异性给得出明确结论带来了挑战。为了解决这一缺乏统一性的问题,我们汇编了 121 篇科学文章的研究结果,并进行了全面的荟萃分析。研究结果表明,人工添加病原体会导致性能被高估。目前最常见的指标都准确地代表了各自的微生物群。梭状芽孢杆菌几乎不受厌氧消化法的影响,某些预处理技术可能对其有利。此外,还研究了操作参数以及预处理和后处理与厌氧消化(AD)对减少病原体的影响。虽然确定了最佳批次持续时间,但(半)连续系统中的水力停留时间并不影响总体病原体减少量。以加热为基础的后处理与嗜热厌氧消化(AD)技术相结合,能最大程度地减少病原体,符合相关法律规定。前所未有的统计分析对关键参数进行了定量分类。结果证实,温度是最重要的参数。在嗜热条件下,病原体的减少量最高,而嗜心理和嗜中温的表现类似。pH 值对病原体去除的影响也得到了证实,酸性和碱性值可提高病原体的去除率。需要在多标准优化方法(如病原体减少、沼气生产和沼渣质量)中对所有厌氧消化产物进行更多研究,以确定考虑所有方面的最佳条件。这项研究为研究和工业规模的厌氧消化(AD)提供了新颖和相关的结论,并提出了一些研发观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信