{"title":"Decarbonizing industrial hubs and clusters: Towards an integrated framework of green industrial policies","authors":"Soyoung Oh , Mohammed Al-Juaied","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This perspective aims to enhance understanding of industrial decarbonization strategies (e.g., carbon capture, utilization, and storage [CCUS] and hydrogen) at industrial hubs. We provide a comparative analysis of policy landscapes for the three different net-zero industrial hub projects and conclude by proposing considerations for designing green industrial policies for other regions that need deep decarbonization for their ‘hard-to-abate’ sectors.</div><div>Our case studies highlight the importance of carbon pricing mechanisms to crowd in private investments, thus providing strong signals for structural change to different stakeholders across the value chain. As industrial decarbonization, however, faces unique challenges due to its complex value chain and the need for supportive infrastructure, such as CO<sub>2</sub> transport and storage, government support for the infrastructure is essential to complement the private sector's efforts in the early stages. Over time, increasing carbon prices and phasing out free allowances can further incentivize the deployment of CCUS and hydrogen in the industry sector. For countries where raising carbon prices is politically difficult, policies designed to smooth the transition, such as carbon contracts for difference, offer a viable alternative. A well-designed mix of demand-pull and supply-push policy instruments is therefore crucial for achieving industrial decarbonization, taking into account each country's existing domestic assets, financial capacity, and geography (i.e., carbon storage capacity).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This perspective aims to enhance understanding of industrial decarbonization strategies (e.g., carbon capture, utilization, and storage [CCUS] and hydrogen) at industrial hubs. We provide a comparative analysis of policy landscapes for the three different net-zero industrial hub projects and conclude by proposing considerations for designing green industrial policies for other regions that need deep decarbonization for their ‘hard-to-abate’ sectors.
Our case studies highlight the importance of carbon pricing mechanisms to crowd in private investments, thus providing strong signals for structural change to different stakeholders across the value chain. As industrial decarbonization, however, faces unique challenges due to its complex value chain and the need for supportive infrastructure, such as CO2 transport and storage, government support for the infrastructure is essential to complement the private sector's efforts in the early stages. Over time, increasing carbon prices and phasing out free allowances can further incentivize the deployment of CCUS and hydrogen in the industry sector. For countries where raising carbon prices is politically difficult, policies designed to smooth the transition, such as carbon contracts for difference, offer a viable alternative. A well-designed mix of demand-pull and supply-push policy instruments is therefore crucial for achieving industrial decarbonization, taking into account each country's existing domestic assets, financial capacity, and geography (i.e., carbon storage capacity).
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.