{"title":"Dynamic collaborative truck-drone delivery with en-route synchronization and random requests","authors":"Haipeng Cui , Keyu Li , Shuai Jia , Qiang Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coordinated truck and drone delivery is gaining popularity in logistics as it can greatly reduce operation costs. However, existing studies on related operations management problems typically ignore the following important features: (i) the random appearance of requests, which require operators to dynamically respond to the requests; and (ii) the decisions of optimal launch and retrieval locations for trucks and drones instead of fixed to customer locations, which can significantly impact the overall time costs. To tackle these challenges, this study investigates the dynamic collaborative truck-drone routing problem with randomly arriving requests and synchronization on routes. We model the problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and solve the MDP via a reinforcement learning (RL) approach. The proposed RL approach determines: (i) whether each request should be serviced upon arrival, (ii) which truck or drone should be assigned for the request, and (iii) the optimal en-route take-off and landing positions for paired trucks and drones. We further employ a framework of decentralized learning and centralized dispatching in RL to increase performance. Numerical experiments are conducted to assess the proposed solution approach on instances generated based on both the Solomon dataset and real-world operational data of a logistics operator in Singapore over several benchmark algorithms under various battery endurance levels of drones and distinct transportation scenarios including node-based dynamic collaborative truck-drone routing problem, dynamic non-collaborative truck and drone routing problem, and dynamic vehicle routing problem. The results show that our RL solution outperforms the benchmark algorithm in total profit by an average of 28.03 %, and our en-route takeoff and landing scenario outperforms the benchmark scenarios in total profit by an average of 8.43 % in multi-day instances. Additionally, compared to the traditional node-based landing scenario, employing our en-route takeoff and landing strategy can save 0.9 h/(drone*day) of waiting time on average.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 103802"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524003934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coordinated truck and drone delivery is gaining popularity in logistics as it can greatly reduce operation costs. However, existing studies on related operations management problems typically ignore the following important features: (i) the random appearance of requests, which require operators to dynamically respond to the requests; and (ii) the decisions of optimal launch and retrieval locations for trucks and drones instead of fixed to customer locations, which can significantly impact the overall time costs. To tackle these challenges, this study investigates the dynamic collaborative truck-drone routing problem with randomly arriving requests and synchronization on routes. We model the problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and solve the MDP via a reinforcement learning (RL) approach. The proposed RL approach determines: (i) whether each request should be serviced upon arrival, (ii) which truck or drone should be assigned for the request, and (iii) the optimal en-route take-off and landing positions for paired trucks and drones. We further employ a framework of decentralized learning and centralized dispatching in RL to increase performance. Numerical experiments are conducted to assess the proposed solution approach on instances generated based on both the Solomon dataset and real-world operational data of a logistics operator in Singapore over several benchmark algorithms under various battery endurance levels of drones and distinct transportation scenarios including node-based dynamic collaborative truck-drone routing problem, dynamic non-collaborative truck and drone routing problem, and dynamic vehicle routing problem. The results show that our RL solution outperforms the benchmark algorithm in total profit by an average of 28.03 %, and our en-route takeoff and landing scenario outperforms the benchmark scenarios in total profit by an average of 8.43 % in multi-day instances. Additionally, compared to the traditional node-based landing scenario, employing our en-route takeoff and landing strategy can save 0.9 h/(drone*day) of waiting time on average.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.