What drives AI-based risk information-seeking intent? Insufficiency of risk information versus (Un)certainty of AI chatbots

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Soo Jung Hong
{"title":"What drives AI-based risk information-seeking intent? Insufficiency of risk information versus (Un)certainty of AI chatbots","authors":"Soo Jung Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored the factors influencing the U.S. public's intent to seek risk information via AI-powered channels, such as ChatGPT. It focused on cognitive and affective pathways that lead to uncertainty about both risk information and AI chatbots in the context of climate change risk. We conducted a comparative analysis to discern the impacts of risk perceptions related to climate change and AI-caused privacy risks on public uncertainty and decision-making regarding the use of AI chatbots. Specifically, we assessed how different risk-related perceptions and emotions contribute to subsequent uncertainty perceptions and decision-making regarding AI chatbot use for climate change risk information. We enlisted 1023 U.S. citizens aged 21–65 via CloudResearch in September 2023. The results reveal that high levels of perceived risk, strong negative emotions, and information insufficiency drive information-seeking behavior through AI chatbots. Perceived privacy concerns about AI technology significantly increase AI anxiety, which is positively associated with perceived uncertainty. Both AI anxiety and perceived uncertainty negatively affect the intent to seek information via AI chatbots. Conversely, perceived trust in AI chatbots significantly increases positive emotional responses, reduces perceived uncertainty, and enhances the intent to seek information via AI chatbots. We also investigated the mediation effects within each study model tested. The findings offer theoretical and practical implications for future studies on the public's adoption of AI services for risk information seeking, influenced by both risk-related and technology-based contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108460"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224003285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the factors influencing the U.S. public's intent to seek risk information via AI-powered channels, such as ChatGPT. It focused on cognitive and affective pathways that lead to uncertainty about both risk information and AI chatbots in the context of climate change risk. We conducted a comparative analysis to discern the impacts of risk perceptions related to climate change and AI-caused privacy risks on public uncertainty and decision-making regarding the use of AI chatbots. Specifically, we assessed how different risk-related perceptions and emotions contribute to subsequent uncertainty perceptions and decision-making regarding AI chatbot use for climate change risk information. We enlisted 1023 U.S. citizens aged 21–65 via CloudResearch in September 2023. The results reveal that high levels of perceived risk, strong negative emotions, and information insufficiency drive information-seeking behavior through AI chatbots. Perceived privacy concerns about AI technology significantly increase AI anxiety, which is positively associated with perceived uncertainty. Both AI anxiety and perceived uncertainty negatively affect the intent to seek information via AI chatbots. Conversely, perceived trust in AI chatbots significantly increases positive emotional responses, reduces perceived uncertainty, and enhances the intent to seek information via AI chatbots. We also investigated the mediation effects within each study model tested. The findings offer theoretical and practical implications for future studies on the public's adoption of AI services for risk information seeking, influenced by both risk-related and technology-based contexts.
是什么驱动了基于人工智能的风险信息搜索意图?风险信息的不足与人工智能聊天机器人的(不)确定性
本研究探讨了影响美国公众通过人工智能渠道(如 ChatGPT)寻求风险信息的因素。研究的重点是在气候变化风险的背景下,导致风险信息和人工智能聊天机器人不确定性的认知和情感途径。我们进行了一项比较分析,以了解与气候变化相关的风险认知和人工智能导致的隐私风险对公众使用人工智能聊天机器人的不确定性和决策的影响。具体来说,我们评估了不同的风险相关认知和情绪是如何影响随后的不确定性认知和有关使用人工智能聊天机器人获取气候变化风险信息的决策的。2023 年 9 月,我们通过 CloudResearch 征集了 1023 名 21-65 岁的美国公民。结果显示,高度的风险感知、强烈的负面情绪和信息不足推动了通过人工智能聊天机器人寻求信息的行为。对人工智能技术隐私的感知担忧大大增加了人工智能焦虑,而这种焦虑与感知到的不确定性呈正相关。人工智能焦虑和感知到的不确定性都会对通过人工智能聊天机器人寻求信息的意愿产生负面影响。相反,对人工智能聊天机器人的感知信任会明显增加积极的情绪反应,减少感知不确定性,并增强通过人工智能聊天机器人寻求信息的意愿。我们还调查了每个测试研究模型中的中介效应。研究结果为今后研究公众采用人工智能服务寻求风险信息提供了理论和实践意义,这些研究受到风险相关和技术背景的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信