Predictors of future overdose among people who inject drugs in Baltimore, Maryland

Michael P. Ramirez , Gregory M. Lucas , Kathleen R. Page , Katie Zook , Miles Landry , Amanda Rosecrans , Robert Harris , Suzanne M. Grieb , Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia , William Clarke , Susan G. Sherman , Brian W. Weir
{"title":"Predictors of future overdose among people who inject drugs in Baltimore, Maryland","authors":"Michael P. Ramirez ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Lucas ,&nbsp;Kathleen R. Page ,&nbsp;Katie Zook ,&nbsp;Miles Landry ,&nbsp;Amanda Rosecrans ,&nbsp;Robert Harris ,&nbsp;Suzanne M. Grieb ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia ,&nbsp;William Clarke ,&nbsp;Susan G. Sherman ,&nbsp;Brian W. Weir","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Longitudinal studies of future overdose risk among people who inject drugs (PWID) are needed to inform planning of targeted overdose preventions in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Integrating Services to Improve Treatment and Engagement (INSITE) study followed 720 PWID between June 2018 and August 2019 to evaluate the delivery of mobilized healthcare services in Baltimore, Maryland. The present analyses used logistic regression to identify baseline characteristics predictive of non-fatal or fatal overdose during the 6-month follow-up among 507 participants with overdose information. Non-fatal overdoses were self-reported and fatal overdoses were identified through the National Death Index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At baseline, 121 (23 %) reported an overdose in the prior 6 months. Between baseline and follow-up, 66 (13 %) participants reported a non-fatal overdose and 6 (1 %) experienced a fatal overdose. Overdose during follow-up was positively associated with overdose in the 6 months prior to baseline (6.70 aOR; 95 % CI: 3.51, 12.78) and more than 6 months prior to baseline (2.49 aOR; 95 % CI: 1.52, 4.08) versus no prior overdose. Overdose during follow-up was also positively associated with buprenorphine treatment (2.37 aOR; CI: 1.08, 5.21) and negatively associated with non-prescribed methadone at baseline (0.59 aOR; 0.38, 0.93).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Identifying and intervening with PWID who experienced a recent overdose could reduce short-term elevated risk of future overdose. However, as other PWID reported never experiencing an overdose at baseline nonetheless experienced an overdose during follow-up, targeted approaches should be complemented with population-level interventions. Overdose risk implications of buprenorphine treatment and non-prescribed methadone are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Longitudinal studies of future overdose risk among people who inject drugs (PWID) are needed to inform planning of targeted overdose preventions in the United States.

Methods

The Integrating Services to Improve Treatment and Engagement (INSITE) study followed 720 PWID between June 2018 and August 2019 to evaluate the delivery of mobilized healthcare services in Baltimore, Maryland. The present analyses used logistic regression to identify baseline characteristics predictive of non-fatal or fatal overdose during the 6-month follow-up among 507 participants with overdose information. Non-fatal overdoses were self-reported and fatal overdoses were identified through the National Death Index.

Results

At baseline, 121 (23 %) reported an overdose in the prior 6 months. Between baseline and follow-up, 66 (13 %) participants reported a non-fatal overdose and 6 (1 %) experienced a fatal overdose. Overdose during follow-up was positively associated with overdose in the 6 months prior to baseline (6.70 aOR; 95 % CI: 3.51, 12.78) and more than 6 months prior to baseline (2.49 aOR; 95 % CI: 1.52, 4.08) versus no prior overdose. Overdose during follow-up was also positively associated with buprenorphine treatment (2.37 aOR; CI: 1.08, 5.21) and negatively associated with non-prescribed methadone at baseline (0.59 aOR; 0.38, 0.93).

Conclusions

Identifying and intervening with PWID who experienced a recent overdose could reduce short-term elevated risk of future overdose. However, as other PWID reported never experiencing an overdose at baseline nonetheless experienced an overdose during follow-up, targeted approaches should be complemented with population-level interventions. Overdose risk implications of buprenorphine treatment and non-prescribed methadone are also discussed.
马里兰州巴尔的摩市注射吸毒者未来用药过量的预测因素
背景需要对注射吸毒者(PWID)未来的用药过量风险进行纵向研究,以便为美国有针对性的用药过量预防规划提供信息。方法2018年6月至2019年8月期间,整合服务以改善治疗和参与(INSITE)研究对720名PWID进行了随访,以评估马里兰州巴尔的摩市动员医疗保健服务的提供情况。本分析采用逻辑回归法来确定 507 名有用药过量信息的参与者在 6 个月随访期间可预测非致命或致命用药过量的基线特征。非致命性用药过量是自我报告的,致命性用药过量是通过国家死亡指数确定的。在基线和随访期间,66 名参与者(13%)报告了非致命性用药过量,6 名参与者(1%)报告了致命性用药过量。随访期间用药过量与基线前 6 个月内用药过量(6.70 aOR;95 % CI:3.51, 12.78)和基线前 6 个月以上用药过量(2.49 aOR;95 % CI:1.52, 4.08)呈正相关。随访期间用药过量还与丁丙诺啡治疗呈正相关(2.37 aOR; CI: 1.08, 5.21),与基线时未使用美沙酮呈负相关(0.59 aOR; 0.38, 0.93)。然而,由于其他吸毒成瘾者在基线报告中称从未出现过吸毒过量,但在随访期间却出现过吸毒过量,因此在采取有针对性的方法的同时,还应辅以人群干预措施。此外,还讨论了丁丙诺啡治疗和非处方美沙酮的用药过量风险影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信