Can Chinese investors manage climate risk domestically and globally?

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yike Liu, Zihan Xu, Xiaoyun Xing, Yuxuan Zhu
{"title":"Can Chinese investors manage climate risk domestically and globally?","authors":"Yike Liu,&nbsp;Zihan Xu,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Xing,&nbsp;Yuxuan Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate risk is increasing and poses a risk for investors in China’s traditional stock market. In this paper, we construct a TVP-VAR-DY model and use benchmark regression and asset portfolio to explore the impact of climate risk on the Chinese stock market and whether assets with risk aversion attributes or green and low-carbon features can effectively manage climate risk. In particular, we compare China’s climate risk with global climate risk and explore transition and physical risks separately. The results show that climate risk does affect the Chinese stock market and that Chinese climate risk has a greater impact on the stock market than global climate risk. However, the good news is that the metal assets, as well as the equity-type and bond-type green assets, are effective in reducing cross-market spillovers under China’s climate risk, indicating that these assets can provide diversification benefits against climate-driven risks domestically. We also find that the metals and the equity-type assets could dampen the spillover effect against global transition risk, and the bond-type ones serve this function against global physical risk. The results further show that, for China’s stock market investors, adding green bonds to their portfolios could reduce the downside risk, regardless of climate risk type or origin. In addition, we can infer that investors are suggested to use traditional safe-haven assets and bond-type green ones to manage climate risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024006567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate risk is increasing and poses a risk for investors in China’s traditional stock market. In this paper, we construct a TVP-VAR-DY model and use benchmark regression and asset portfolio to explore the impact of climate risk on the Chinese stock market and whether assets with risk aversion attributes or green and low-carbon features can effectively manage climate risk. In particular, we compare China’s climate risk with global climate risk and explore transition and physical risks separately. The results show that climate risk does affect the Chinese stock market and that Chinese climate risk has a greater impact on the stock market than global climate risk. However, the good news is that the metal assets, as well as the equity-type and bond-type green assets, are effective in reducing cross-market spillovers under China’s climate risk, indicating that these assets can provide diversification benefits against climate-driven risks domestically. We also find that the metals and the equity-type assets could dampen the spillover effect against global transition risk, and the bond-type ones serve this function against global physical risk. The results further show that, for China’s stock market investors, adding green bonds to their portfolios could reduce the downside risk, regardless of climate risk type or origin. In addition, we can infer that investors are suggested to use traditional safe-haven assets and bond-type green ones to manage climate risk.
中国投资者能否管理好国内和全球的气候风险?
气候风险不断增加,给中国传统股市的投资者带来了风险。本文构建 TVP-VAR-DY 模型,利用基准回归和资产组合,探讨气候风险对中国股市的影响,以及具有风险规避属性或绿色低碳特征的资产能否有效管理气候风险。其中,我们将中国的气候风险与全球气候风险进行了比较,并分别探讨了转型风险和实体风险。结果表明,气候风险确实会影响中国股市,而且中国气候风险对股市的影响要大于全球气候风险。不过,好消息是,金属资产以及股票型和债券型绿色资产能够有效降低中国气候风险下的跨市场溢出效应,这表明这些资产能够为国内气候驱动的风险提供分散化收益。我们还发现,金属和股票类资产可以抑制全球转型风险的溢出效应,而债券类资产则具有抑制全球实物风险的功能。结果进一步表明,对于中国股市投资者而言,无论气候风险的类型或来源如何,在投资组合中加入绿色债券都可以降低下行风险。此外,我们还可以推断,建议投资者使用传统的避险资产和债券型绿色资产来管理气候风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信