Waves or ripples: African countries risk shocks and the survival of Chinese exports to Africa

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
{"title":"Waves or ripples: African countries risk shocks and the survival of Chinese exports to Africa","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the impact of risk shocks in Africa on the stability of Chinese firms' export relationships by analyzing risk fluctuations and using survival analysis to measure their effect. The findings reveal that risk shocks significantly increase the survival risk of Chinese firms' export relationships, leading to a notable reduction in stability. Private and non-foreign firms are more vulnerable to these risks, but certain market strategies such as learning-by-doing, learning from neighboring firms, and waiting strategies can effectively mitigate their adverse effects on export stability. Our findings indicate that certain market strategies, such as learning-by-doing, learning from neighboring firms, and waiting strategies, can effectively mitigate the adverse effects of risk shocks on export stability. Interestingly, a nonlinear marginal effect is observed in the case of the waiting-timing strategy. However, adopting a multi-destination strategy tends to worsen the negative impact of risk shocks on export stability, especially for private firms. Furthermore, non-market strategies employed by firms that promote government diplomatic behavior help reduce this negative impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001767","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of risk shocks in Africa on the stability of Chinese firms' export relationships by analyzing risk fluctuations and using survival analysis to measure their effect. The findings reveal that risk shocks significantly increase the survival risk of Chinese firms' export relationships, leading to a notable reduction in stability. Private and non-foreign firms are more vulnerable to these risks, but certain market strategies such as learning-by-doing, learning from neighboring firms, and waiting strategies can effectively mitigate their adverse effects on export stability. Our findings indicate that certain market strategies, such as learning-by-doing, learning from neighboring firms, and waiting strategies, can effectively mitigate the adverse effects of risk shocks on export stability. Interestingly, a nonlinear marginal effect is observed in the case of the waiting-timing strategy. However, adopting a multi-destination strategy tends to worsen the negative impact of risk shocks on export stability, especially for private firms. Furthermore, non-market strategies employed by firms that promote government diplomatic behavior help reduce this negative impact.
波浪还是涟漪?非洲国家的风险冲击与中国对非出口的生存之道
本文通过分析风险波动并利用生存分析法衡量其影响,研究了非洲风险冲击对中国企业出口关系稳定性的影响。研究结果表明,风险冲击大大增加了中国企业出口关系的生存风险,导致稳定性明显下降。民营企业和非外资企业更容易受到这些风险的影响,但某些市场策略,如边做边学、向周边企业学习和等待策略,可以有效缓解这些风险对出口稳定性的不利影响。我们的研究结果表明,某些市场策略,如边做边学、向周边企业学习和等待策略,可以有效缓解风险冲击对出口稳定性的不利影响。有趣的是,在等待时机策略中观察到了非线性边际效应。然而,采取多目的地战略往往会加剧风险冲击对出口稳定性的负面影响,尤其是对私营企业而言。此外,企业采用的促进政府外交行为的非市场战略有助于减少这种负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信