LIPOPROTEIN(A) ELEVATIONS COMMON, BUT NOT HIGHER IN GENOTYPE POSITIVE FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA VERSUS GENOTYPE NEGATIVE INDIVIDUALS WITH HYPERLIPIDEMIA, IN PATIENTS REFERRED TO A DEDICATED CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC COUNSELING CLINIC
{"title":"LIPOPROTEIN(A) ELEVATIONS COMMON, BUT NOT HIGHER IN GENOTYPE POSITIVE FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA VERSUS GENOTYPE NEGATIVE INDIVIDUALS WITH HYPERLIPIDEMIA, IN PATIENTS REFERRED TO A DEDICATED CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC COUNSELING CLINIC","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD/CVD Risk Factors</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an apob100 containing lipoprotein with athero- and thrombogenic potential with a global population prevalence estimated at 20%. Previous research has presented conflicting data on whether individuals with genotype positive (Gene+) familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are more likely to have elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) vs genotype negative (Gene-) individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective review of a 200 individual cohort of patients referred to be seen by the Intermountain Medical Center Cardiovascular Genetic Counseling clinic from 2018 to 2024 who had Lp(a) measurements (mg/dL) and underwent full gene sequencing and deletion/duplication analysis of the APOB, LDLR, LDLRAP1, and PCSK9 genes using next-generation sequencing technologies. The Lp(a) measurements were compared between 56 gene+ individuals and 144 gene- individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 56 gene+ individuals, 21 had an Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (37.5%). Of the 144 gene- individuals, 61 had an Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (42.4%). Using Pearson's Chi-Squared Test, we calculated the chi-square value of 0.53.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The prevalence of elevated Lp(a) was nearly double (37.5% and 42.4%) than is estimated in the general population. However, the difference in proportion of patients with elevated Lp(a) between gene+ and gene- patients was not statistically significant. These findings reaffirm the importance of screening for elevated Lp(a) in all patients, regardless of genotype status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Therapeutic Area
ASCVD/CVD Risk Factors
Background
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an apob100 containing lipoprotein with athero- and thrombogenic potential with a global population prevalence estimated at 20%. Previous research has presented conflicting data on whether individuals with genotype positive (Gene+) familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are more likely to have elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) vs genotype negative (Gene-) individuals.
Methods
We performed a retrospective review of a 200 individual cohort of patients referred to be seen by the Intermountain Medical Center Cardiovascular Genetic Counseling clinic from 2018 to 2024 who had Lp(a) measurements (mg/dL) and underwent full gene sequencing and deletion/duplication analysis of the APOB, LDLR, LDLRAP1, and PCSK9 genes using next-generation sequencing technologies. The Lp(a) measurements were compared between 56 gene+ individuals and 144 gene- individuals.
Results
Of the 56 gene+ individuals, 21 had an Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (37.5%). Of the 144 gene- individuals, 61 had an Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (42.4%). Using Pearson's Chi-Squared Test, we calculated the chi-square value of 0.53.
Conclusions
The prevalence of elevated Lp(a) was nearly double (37.5% and 42.4%) than is estimated in the general population. However, the difference in proportion of patients with elevated Lp(a) between gene+ and gene- patients was not statistically significant. These findings reaffirm the importance of screening for elevated Lp(a) in all patients, regardless of genotype status.