A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Anxiety- and Depressive-Like Behaviors in Rodent Models of Neuropathic Pain

IF 4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Tomás de la Rosa , Meritxell Llorca-Torralba , Adrián Martínez-Cortés , Cristina Romero-López-Alberca , Esther Berrocoso
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Anxiety- and Depressive-Like Behaviors in Rodent Models of Neuropathic Pain","authors":"Tomás de la Rosa ,&nbsp;Meritxell Llorca-Torralba ,&nbsp;Adrián Martínez-Cortés ,&nbsp;Cristina Romero-López-Alberca ,&nbsp;Esther Berrocoso","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epidemiological studies have frequently shown the concurrence of chronic pain with symptoms of anxiety and depression, particularly in women. Animal models are useful to understand the complex mechanisms underlying comorbidities, but the wide range of methods employed and the wealth of evidence sometimes impedes effective translation and reproducibility. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the influence of variables such as sex and species on anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in rodent models of neuropathic pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following PROSPERO registration, we searched EMBASE, Scopus, and the Web of Science from their inception to November 24, 2023, identifying 126 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The Hedges’ <em>g</em> value for each experiment and study was calculated, and further subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Neuropathic pain significantly reduced the time that rats and mice spent in the open arms of the elevated plus and zero mazes (<em>g</em> = −1.14), time spent in the center of the open field (<em>g</em> = −1.12), sucrose consumption in the sucrose preference test (<em>g</em> = −1.43), and grooming time in the splash test (<em>g</em> = −1.37) while increasing latency to feed in the novelty-suppressed feeding test (<em>g</em> = 1.59) and immobility in the forced swimming (<em>g</em> = 1.85) and tail suspension (<em>g</em> = 1.91) tests. Sex differences were observed, with weaker effects in female than in male rodents for several behavioral paradigms, and funnel plots identified positive publication bias in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This meta-analysis emphasizes the effect of neuropathic pain on anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in rodents, highlighting the importance of investigating sex differences in future experimental studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 100388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Epidemiological studies have frequently shown the concurrence of chronic pain with symptoms of anxiety and depression, particularly in women. Animal models are useful to understand the complex mechanisms underlying comorbidities, but the wide range of methods employed and the wealth of evidence sometimes impedes effective translation and reproducibility. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the influence of variables such as sex and species on anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in rodent models of neuropathic pain.

Methods

Following PROSPERO registration, we searched EMBASE, Scopus, and the Web of Science from their inception to November 24, 2023, identifying 126 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The Hedges’ g value for each experiment and study was calculated, and further subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed.

Results

Neuropathic pain significantly reduced the time that rats and mice spent in the open arms of the elevated plus and zero mazes (g = −1.14), time spent in the center of the open field (g = −1.12), sucrose consumption in the sucrose preference test (g = −1.43), and grooming time in the splash test (g = −1.37) while increasing latency to feed in the novelty-suppressed feeding test (g = 1.59) and immobility in the forced swimming (g = 1.85) and tail suspension (g = 1.91) tests. Sex differences were observed, with weaker effects in female than in male rodents for several behavioral paradigms, and funnel plots identified positive publication bias in the literature.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis emphasizes the effect of neuropathic pain on anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in rodents, highlighting the importance of investigating sex differences in future experimental studies.
神经性疼痛啮齿动物模型中焦虑和抑郁样行为的系统回顾和元分析
背景流行病学研究经常显示慢性疼痛与焦虑和抑郁症状同时存在,尤其是在女性中。动物模型有助于了解并发症的复杂机制,但所采用的方法种类繁多,证据数量巨大,有时会妨碍有效的转化和可重复性。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们旨在综合性别和物种等变量对神经病理性疼痛啮齿类动物模型中焦虑和抑郁样行为影响的证据。结果神经病理性疼痛显著减少了大鼠和小鼠在高架正迷宫和零迷宫开放臂中的停留时间(g = -1.14)、在开放场地中心的停留时间(g = -1.12 )、蔗糖偏好试验中的蔗糖消耗量(g = -1.43 )和飞溅试验中的梳理时间(g = -1.37 ),同时增加了新奇感抑制摄食试验中的摄食潜伏期(g = 1.59 )以及强迫游泳(g = 1.85 )和尾悬吊(g = 1.91 )试验中的不动性。结论这项荟萃分析强调了神经性疼痛对啮齿类动物焦虑和抑郁样行为的影响,突出了在未来实验研究中调查性别差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信