Flow data forecasting for the junction flow using artificial neural network

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Besir Sahin , Cetin Canpolat , Mehmet Bilgili
{"title":"Flow data forecasting for the junction flow using artificial neural network","authors":"Besir Sahin ,&nbsp;Cetin Canpolat ,&nbsp;Mehmet Bilgili","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2024.102703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study aims to predict the flow characteristics downstream of a cylinder, which is the result of junction flow using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. The training and test datasets were obtained through Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiments. The experiments were conducted at Reynolds numbers Re = 1.5 x 10<sup>3</sup> and 4 x 10<sup>3</sup> based on the cylinder diameter (D) at dimensionless measurement heights (Z = h/D) of Z<sub>1</sub> = 0.06, Z<sub>2</sub> = 0.4, Z<sub>3</sub> = 0.8, and Z<sub>4</sub> = 1.6 respectively. While the X- and Y-coordinate and dimensionless measurement location (Z) variables are employed as inputs to the ANN model, the output variables are vorticity ⟨ω⟩, streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩, and transverse velocity ⟨v⟩, which are derived from the time-averaged flow data. Modeling flow characteristics with easily obtainable independent variables without flow and physical properties was considered. Three various training algorithms such as Levenberg Marquardt (LM), Resilient Backpropagation (RP), and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) were employed to assess and compare their prediction performance. The results indicate that the LM learning algorithm outperforms the RP and SCG algorithms, especially at low Reynolds (Re) numbers. The ANN model, trained with the LM algorithm, exhibits significant success, achieving R = 0.9816 correlation coefficient (R), MAE = 2.4250 m/s Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and RMSE = 3.3541 m/s Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩ data. Notably, the LM algorithm for the testing process demonstrates the best predictions at Re = 1.5x10<sup>3</sup>, yielding R = 0.9779, MAE = 2.7417 m/s, and RMSE = 3.7493 m/s. The ANN-LM model's patterns closely align with experimental results, affirming its accuracy, which proves that the prediction of time-averaged velocity data solely based on spatial coordinates as input can be achieved successfully.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598624001833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to predict the flow characteristics downstream of a cylinder, which is the result of junction flow using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. The training and test datasets were obtained through Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiments. The experiments were conducted at Reynolds numbers Re = 1.5 x 103 and 4 x 103 based on the cylinder diameter (D) at dimensionless measurement heights (Z = h/D) of Z1 = 0.06, Z2 = 0.4, Z3 = 0.8, and Z4 = 1.6 respectively. While the X- and Y-coordinate and dimensionless measurement location (Z) variables are employed as inputs to the ANN model, the output variables are vorticity ⟨ω⟩, streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩, and transverse velocity ⟨v⟩, which are derived from the time-averaged flow data. Modeling flow characteristics with easily obtainable independent variables without flow and physical properties was considered. Three various training algorithms such as Levenberg Marquardt (LM), Resilient Backpropagation (RP), and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) were employed to assess and compare their prediction performance. The results indicate that the LM learning algorithm outperforms the RP and SCG algorithms, especially at low Reynolds (Re) numbers. The ANN model, trained with the LM algorithm, exhibits significant success, achieving R = 0.9816 correlation coefficient (R), MAE = 2.4250 m/s Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and RMSE = 3.3541 m/s Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩ data. Notably, the LM algorithm for the testing process demonstrates the best predictions at Re = 1.5x103, yielding R = 0.9779, MAE = 2.7417 m/s, and RMSE = 3.7493 m/s. The ANN-LM model's patterns closely align with experimental results, affirming its accuracy, which proves that the prediction of time-averaged velocity data solely based on spatial coordinates as input can be achieved successfully.
利用人工神经网络预测交界处的流量数据
本研究旨在使用人工神经网络(ANN)算法预测气缸下游的流动特性,即交界处流动的结果。训练和测试数据集通过粒子图像测速仪(PIV)实验获得。实验在雷诺数 Re = 1.5 x 103 和 4 x 103 的条件下进行,以气缸直径 (D) 为基础,无量纲测量高度 (Z = h/D) 分别为 Z1 = 0.06、Z2 = 0.4、Z3 = 0.8 和 Z4 = 1.6。X 坐标、Y 坐标和无量纲测量位置 (Z) 变量被用作 ANN 模型的输入变量,而输出变量则是涡度 ⟨ω⟩、流速 ⟨u⟩和横向速度 ⟨v⟩,它们来自时间平均流速数据。在不考虑流量和物理特性的情况下,考虑用容易获得的自变量来模拟流动特性。采用了三种不同的训练算法,如 Levenberg Marquardt (LM)、Resilient Backpropagation (RP) 和 Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG),以评估和比较它们的预测性能。结果表明,LM 学习算法优于 RP 和 SCG 算法,尤其是在低雷诺数 (Re) 条件下。使用 LM 算法训练的 ANN 模型取得了显著的成功,对于流向速度⟨u⟩数据,相关系数(R)达到 0.9816,平均绝对误差(MAE)达到 2.4250 m/s,均方根误差(RMSE)达到 3.3541 m/s。值得注意的是,用于测试过程的 LM 算法在 Re = 1.5x103 时显示出最佳预测结果,R = 0.9779,MAE = 2.7417 m/s,RMSE = 3.7493 m/s。ANN-LM 模型的模式与实验结果非常吻合,证实了其准确性,这也证明了仅以空间坐标为输入的时均速度数据预测是可以成功实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions. FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest: Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible. Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems. Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories. Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信