Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During humanitarian crises, under-resourced and overstretched health systems may not be able to fully meet mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) needs of affected populations, including refugees, internally displaced persons and host communities. Health system governance is vital to humanitarian health response, but there has been little research on this, particularly for MHPSS. We present a case study of a national MHPSS coordination mechanism (the MHPSS Taskforce) in Lebanon, a country which has experienced multiple crises and hosts over 2 million refugees. The aim was to explore the barriers and enablers facing the MHPSS Taskforce in responding to the needs of displaced and host populations in Lebanon. Interviews were conducted with 34 key stakeholders, including Taskforce members, representatives from non-governmental organisations, United Nations agencies, and government Ministries. Our findings show that the positioning of MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system acts as a barrier to mounting an effective response, with the MHPSS Taskforce sometimes siloed rather than integrated across clusters. Coordination within the Taskforce was reported to be effective in some respects, but limited by a lack of clarity about its decision-making processes, affiliation, mandate, and inclusion of regional perspectives and key groups such as mental health services users in Lebanon. While the technical capacity of the Taskforce is strong, limited funding and staffing were seen to impact its capacity to effectively oversee the MHPSS response in Lebanon. Key recommendations include: the need for stronger mechanisms and operating procedures for interagency and inter-sectoral collaboration on MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system; greater clarity on the role of the Taskforce and key Taskforce actors, streamlined reporting channels and greater inclusion of diverse perspectives, particularly mental health service users; and greater financial and human resources within coordination mechanisms to support the national MHPSS response in Lebanon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During humanitarian crises, under-resourced and overstretched health systems may not be able to fully meet mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) needs of affected populations, including refugees, internally displaced persons and host communities. Health system governance is vital to humanitarian health response, but there has been little research on this, particularly for MHPSS. We present a case study of a national MHPSS coordination mechanism (the MHPSS Taskforce) in Lebanon, a country which has experienced multiple crises and hosts over 2 million refugees. The aim was to explore the barriers and enablers facing the MHPSS Taskforce in responding to the needs of displaced and host populations in Lebanon. Interviews were conducted with 34 key stakeholders, including Taskforce members, representatives from non-governmental organisations, United Nations agencies, and government Ministries. Our findings show that the positioning of MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system acts as a barrier to mounting an effective response, with the MHPSS Taskforce sometimes siloed rather than integrated across clusters. Coordination within the Taskforce was reported to be effective in some respects, but limited by a lack of clarity about its decision-making processes, affiliation, mandate, and inclusion of regional perspectives and key groups such as mental health services users in Lebanon. While the technical capacity of the Taskforce is strong, limited funding and staffing were seen to impact its capacity to effectively oversee the MHPSS response in Lebanon. Key recommendations include: the need for stronger mechanisms and operating procedures for interagency and inter-sectoral collaboration on MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system; greater clarity on the role of the Taskforce and key Taskforce actors, streamlined reporting channels and greater inclusion of diverse perspectives, particularly mental health service users; and greater financial and human resources within coordination mechanisms to support the national MHPSS response in Lebanon.
黎巴嫩协调应对 MHPSS 的障碍和促进因素:MHPSS 工作队案例研究
在人道主义危机期间,资源不足和过度紧张的卫生系统可能无法完全满足受影响人群(包括难民、境内流离失所者和收容社区)的心理健康和社会心理支持(MHPSS)需求。医疗系统治理对人道主义医疗响应至关重要,但这方面的研究却很少,尤其是针对心理健康和社会心理支持系统的研究。黎巴嫩经历了多次危机,收容了 200 多万难民,我们将对黎巴嫩的国家 MHPSS 协调机制(MHPSS 工作组)进行案例研究。研究的目的是探讨黎巴嫩的 MHPSS 工作组在应对流离失所者和收容人口的需求时所面临的障碍和有利因素。对 34 个主要利益相关方进行了访谈,包括工作队成员、非政府组织代表、联合国机构和政府部委。我们的调查结果表明,在人道主义分组系统中,MHPSS 的定位是开展有效响应的障碍,MHPSS 工作队有时是孤立的,而不是跨分组整合的。据报告,特别工作组内部的协调在某些方面是有效的,但由于其决策过程、隶属关系、任务授权、地区视角和关键群体(如黎巴嫩的心理健康服务使用者)的纳入等方面不够明确,因而受到限制。虽然特别工作组的技术能力很强,但有限的资金和人员编制影响了其有效监督黎巴嫩精神 健康和社会服务部门应对措施的能力。主要建议包括:需要在人道主义群组系统内建立更强有力的机制和运作程序,以促进机构间和部门间在 MHPSS 方面的合作;进一步明确特别工作组和特别工作组主要参与者的作用,简化报告渠道,更多地纳入不同的观点,特别是心理健康服务使用者的观点;在协调机制内提供更多的财政和人力资源,以支持黎巴嫩全国的 MHPSS 应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信