An exploratory experiment investigating teachers’ attributional race and gender bias and the moderating effects of personal experience of racial discrimination

Abstract

The factors to which teachers attribute students’ successes and failures have important consequences for teachers’ instructional decisions as well as their expectations of students. Yet few, if any, experimental studies have been conducted to investigate the role that students’ race and gender play in how teachers make sense of students’ academic performance. In this exploratory experimental study, conducted with 413 mathematics teachers across the United States, we investigated the extent to which teachers attributed students’ performance disparities in mathematics to internal and external factors based on the students’ race and gender and explored the extent to which teachers’ beliefs and dispositions moderated their attributions. To do so, teachers were first given a collection of the student solutions with no gender or racial performance disparities. They were then randomly assigned to one of four conditions in which they were told that on this particular assessment: boys outperformed girls, girls outperformed boys, Black and Hispanic students outperformed White and Asian students, or that White and Asian students outperformed Black and Hispanic students. They were asked to report the reasons behind the disparities in math performance of these groups. We found that teachers attributed gender disparities in student performance to innate math ability, effort, and external social factors, whereas they attributed racial disparities in student performance to biological influences on intelligence, effort, external social factors or the assessment context. Teachers’ self-reported personal experience with racial discrimination moderated race differences in teacher attributions.