Least failure energy density: A comprehensive strength index to evaluate and optimize heterogeneous periodic structures

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Huawei Feng, Peidong Lei, Huikai Zhang, Bin Liu
{"title":"Least failure energy density: A comprehensive strength index to evaluate and optimize heterogeneous periodic structures","authors":"Huawei Feng,&nbsp;Peidong Lei,&nbsp;Huikai Zhang,&nbsp;Bin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessing the comprehensive strength of structures under multiple loading conditions is crucial for designing microstructures. This paper proposes the use of the least failure energy density (LFED) to measure the comprehensive strength of heterogeneous periodic structures, which corresponds to the minimum energy density required to destroy a structure. To enhance the comprehensive strength of a periodic structure, the LFED can be maximized. We constructed a two-layer optimization algorithm and found that the high time consumption renders topology optimization unfeasible. We subsequently developed an approach for solving inner-layer optimization analytically and quickly so that the problem becomes a single-layer optimization. We compared the LFED of several classical structures, including plate structures, lattice structures, and TPMSs. The calculations reveal that plate structures exhibit the best performance in terms of LFED, followed by TPMSs whereas truss structures have the poorest performance. Among the three types of classical structures, the octet plate, Schwartz-D minimal surface, and octet truss structures are the best-performing types, respectively. Additionally, the LFED is combined with the BESO topology optimization method to obtain the best 2D periodical structure, a 2D curved-edge kagome structure. For optimal 3D periodical structures, rarely discussed space kagome structures (plate or lattice) are obtained with an LFED superior to that of other counterpart classical structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 105892"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509624003582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the comprehensive strength of structures under multiple loading conditions is crucial for designing microstructures. This paper proposes the use of the least failure energy density (LFED) to measure the comprehensive strength of heterogeneous periodic structures, which corresponds to the minimum energy density required to destroy a structure. To enhance the comprehensive strength of a periodic structure, the LFED can be maximized. We constructed a two-layer optimization algorithm and found that the high time consumption renders topology optimization unfeasible. We subsequently developed an approach for solving inner-layer optimization analytically and quickly so that the problem becomes a single-layer optimization. We compared the LFED of several classical structures, including plate structures, lattice structures, and TPMSs. The calculations reveal that plate structures exhibit the best performance in terms of LFED, followed by TPMSs whereas truss structures have the poorest performance. Among the three types of classical structures, the octet plate, Schwartz-D minimal surface, and octet truss structures are the best-performing types, respectively. Additionally, the LFED is combined with the BESO topology optimization method to obtain the best 2D periodical structure, a 2D curved-edge kagome structure. For optimal 3D periodical structures, rarely discussed space kagome structures (plate or lattice) are obtained with an LFED superior to that of other counterpart classical structures.
最小破坏能量密度:用于评估和优化异质周期结构的综合强度指标
评估结构在多重加载条件下的综合强度对于设计微结构至关重要。本文提出使用最小破坏能量密度(LFED)来测量异质周期结构的综合强度,它相当于破坏结构所需的最小能量密度。为了提高周期结构的综合强度,可以最大化 LFED。我们构建了一种双层优化算法,发现高时间消耗使得拓扑优化不可行。随后,我们开发了一种快速分析求解内层优化的方法,使问题变为单层优化。我们比较了几种经典结构的 LFED,包括平板结构、晶格结构和 TPMS。计算结果表明,板结构的 LFED 性能最好,其次是 TPMS,而桁架结构的 LFED 性能最差。在这三种经典结构中,八面体板结构、Schwartz-D 最小面结构和八面体桁架结构分别是性能最好的类型。此外,LFED 与 BESO 拓扑优化方法相结合,得到了最佳的二维周期结构--二维曲边卡戈米结构。对于最佳的三维周期结构,很少讨论的空间 kagome 结构(板或格)的 LFED 优于其他对应的经典结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids is to publish research of the highest quality and of lasting significance on the mechanics of solids. The scope is broad, from fundamental concepts in mechanics to the analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Solids are interpreted broadly to include both hard and soft materials as well as natural and synthetic structures. The approach can be theoretical, experimental or computational.This research activity sits within engineering science and the allied areas of applied mathematics, materials science, bio-mechanics, applied physics, and geophysics. The Journal was founded in 1952 by Rodney Hill, who was its Editor-in-Chief until 1968. The topics of interest to the Journal evolve with developments in the subject but its basic ethos remains the same: to publish research of the highest quality relating to the mechanics of solids. Thus, emphasis is placed on the development of fundamental concepts of mechanics and novel applications of these concepts based on theoretical, experimental or computational approaches, drawing upon the various branches of engineering science and the allied areas within applied mathematics, materials science, structural engineering, applied physics, and geophysics. The main purpose of the Journal is to foster scientific understanding of the processes of deformation and mechanical failure of all solid materials, both technological and natural, and the connections between these processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. In this sense, the content of the Journal should reflect the current state of the discipline in analysis, experimental observation, and numerical simulation. In the interest of achieving this goal, authors are encouraged to consider the significance of their contributions for the field of mechanics and the implications of their results, in addition to describing the details of their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信