{"title":"Least failure energy density: A comprehensive strength index to evaluate and optimize heterogeneous periodic structures","authors":"Huawei Feng, Peidong Lei, Huikai Zhang, Bin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessing the comprehensive strength of structures under multiple loading conditions is crucial for designing microstructures. This paper proposes the use of the least failure energy density (LFED) to measure the comprehensive strength of heterogeneous periodic structures, which corresponds to the minimum energy density required to destroy a structure. To enhance the comprehensive strength of a periodic structure, the LFED can be maximized. We constructed a two-layer optimization algorithm and found that the high time consumption renders topology optimization unfeasible. We subsequently developed an approach for solving inner-layer optimization analytically and quickly so that the problem becomes a single-layer optimization. We compared the LFED of several classical structures, including plate structures, lattice structures, and TPMSs. The calculations reveal that plate structures exhibit the best performance in terms of LFED, followed by TPMSs whereas truss structures have the poorest performance. Among the three types of classical structures, the octet plate, Schwartz-D minimal surface, and octet truss structures are the best-performing types, respectively. Additionally, the LFED is combined with the BESO topology optimization method to obtain the best 2D periodical structure, a 2D curved-edge kagome structure. For optimal 3D periodical structures, rarely discussed space kagome structures (plate or lattice) are obtained with an LFED superior to that of other counterpart classical structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 105892"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509624003582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assessing the comprehensive strength of structures under multiple loading conditions is crucial for designing microstructures. This paper proposes the use of the least failure energy density (LFED) to measure the comprehensive strength of heterogeneous periodic structures, which corresponds to the minimum energy density required to destroy a structure. To enhance the comprehensive strength of a periodic structure, the LFED can be maximized. We constructed a two-layer optimization algorithm and found that the high time consumption renders topology optimization unfeasible. We subsequently developed an approach for solving inner-layer optimization analytically and quickly so that the problem becomes a single-layer optimization. We compared the LFED of several classical structures, including plate structures, lattice structures, and TPMSs. The calculations reveal that plate structures exhibit the best performance in terms of LFED, followed by TPMSs whereas truss structures have the poorest performance. Among the three types of classical structures, the octet plate, Schwartz-D minimal surface, and octet truss structures are the best-performing types, respectively. Additionally, the LFED is combined with the BESO topology optimization method to obtain the best 2D periodical structure, a 2D curved-edge kagome structure. For optimal 3D periodical structures, rarely discussed space kagome structures (plate or lattice) are obtained with an LFED superior to that of other counterpart classical structures.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids is to publish research of the highest quality and of lasting significance on the mechanics of solids. The scope is broad, from fundamental concepts in mechanics to the analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Solids are interpreted broadly to include both hard and soft materials as well as natural and synthetic structures. The approach can be theoretical, experimental or computational.This research activity sits within engineering science and the allied areas of applied mathematics, materials science, bio-mechanics, applied physics, and geophysics.
The Journal was founded in 1952 by Rodney Hill, who was its Editor-in-Chief until 1968. The topics of interest to the Journal evolve with developments in the subject but its basic ethos remains the same: to publish research of the highest quality relating to the mechanics of solids. Thus, emphasis is placed on the development of fundamental concepts of mechanics and novel applications of these concepts based on theoretical, experimental or computational approaches, drawing upon the various branches of engineering science and the allied areas within applied mathematics, materials science, structural engineering, applied physics, and geophysics.
The main purpose of the Journal is to foster scientific understanding of the processes of deformation and mechanical failure of all solid materials, both technological and natural, and the connections between these processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. In this sense, the content of the Journal should reflect the current state of the discipline in analysis, experimental observation, and numerical simulation. In the interest of achieving this goal, authors are encouraged to consider the significance of their contributions for the field of mechanics and the implications of their results, in addition to describing the details of their work.