{"title":"An unemployment re-insurance scheme for the eurozone? Stabilizing and redistributive effects","authors":"Mathias Dolls","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper develops a decomposition framework to study the importance of different stabilization channels of an unemployment re-insurance scheme for the euro area. Running counterfactual simulations based on household micro data for the period 2000–21 and studying the effect of different trigger variables and activation rules, the paper finds that the re-insurance would have cushioned on average 7%–14% (3%–6%) of employment income losses through interregional (intertemporal) smoothing. The simulated re-insurance scheme would have been revenue-neutral at EA-19, but not at the member-state level. Average annual inpayments and payouts would have been below 0.1 per cent of GDP. A back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that the re-insurance could offset up to 18% of future output shocks. These results suggest that a re-insurance would significantly strengthen public risk sharing in the euro area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124002010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper develops a decomposition framework to study the importance of different stabilization channels of an unemployment re-insurance scheme for the euro area. Running counterfactual simulations based on household micro data for the period 2000–21 and studying the effect of different trigger variables and activation rules, the paper finds that the re-insurance would have cushioned on average 7%–14% (3%–6%) of employment income losses through interregional (intertemporal) smoothing. The simulated re-insurance scheme would have been revenue-neutral at EA-19, but not at the member-state level. Average annual inpayments and payouts would have been below 0.1 per cent of GDP. A back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that the re-insurance could offset up to 18% of future output shocks. These results suggest that a re-insurance would significantly strengthen public risk sharing in the euro area.
期刊介绍:
The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.