In ovo administration of L. animalis, B. licheniformis, or their combination influences Ross 708 broiler chick hatch performance and immuno-physiological parameters

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
C.N. Beck , K.G.S. Wamsley , C.D. McDaniel , A.S. Kiess
{"title":"In ovo administration of L. animalis, B. licheniformis, or their combination influences Ross 708 broiler chick hatch performance and immuno-physiological parameters","authors":"C.N. Beck ,&nbsp;K.G.S. Wamsley ,&nbsp;C.D. McDaniel ,&nbsp;A.S. Kiess","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a demand for novel pathogen mitigation strategies in antibiotic-free poultry production, which has triggered the development of various probiotic application methods. One application method is the <em>in ovo</em> (in egg) administration of probiotics on incubation day (<strong>d</strong>) 18, where the unhatched chick consumes a probiotic before hatch and prior to being exposed to environmental pathogens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of <em>in ovo L. animalis, B. licheniformis</em>, or <em>L. animalis + B. licheniformis</em> (10<sup>6</sup> cfu/50 μL each) administration on hatch performance (N = 21 egg flats/treatment, 30 eggs/flat), live performance (N = 12 pens/treatment), and d of hatch immuno-physiological parameters (N = 12 birds/treatment) among Ross 708 broiler chicks. Data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with significance established at <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05. All <em>in ovo</em> probiotic treatments had greater % hatch than the control treatment, and eggs in ovo-administered with <em>B. licheniformis</em> had lower % late dead and % culled-pipped eggs. However, all <em>in ovo</em> probiotic treatments had lower average chick weights compared to those of the HVT vaccine control group. At hatch, chicks administered with <em>B. licheniformis</em> or <em>L. animalis + B. licheniformis</em> had greater relative ceca weight and lower peripheral blood leukocyte levels compared to those belonging to the control group. There were no effects on live performance during the first 2 wk post-hatch. These results show that <em>B. licheniformis</em> and <em>L. animalis</em> are effective candidates for <em>in ovo</em> probiotic administration, but further investigations regarding immuno-physiological responses to <em>in ovo B. licheniformis</em> administration are necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"33 4","pages":"Article 100481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a demand for novel pathogen mitigation strategies in antibiotic-free poultry production, which has triggered the development of various probiotic application methods. One application method is the in ovo (in egg) administration of probiotics on incubation day (d) 18, where the unhatched chick consumes a probiotic before hatch and prior to being exposed to environmental pathogens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of in ovo L. animalis, B. licheniformis, or L. animalis + B. licheniformis (106 cfu/50 μL each) administration on hatch performance (N = 21 egg flats/treatment, 30 eggs/flat), live performance (N = 12 pens/treatment), and d of hatch immuno-physiological parameters (N = 12 birds/treatment) among Ross 708 broiler chicks. Data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with significance established at P ≤ 0.05. All in ovo probiotic treatments had greater % hatch than the control treatment, and eggs in ovo-administered with B. licheniformis had lower % late dead and % culled-pipped eggs. However, all in ovo probiotic treatments had lower average chick weights compared to those of the HVT vaccine control group. At hatch, chicks administered with B. licheniformis or L. animalis + B. licheniformis had greater relative ceca weight and lower peripheral blood leukocyte levels compared to those belonging to the control group. There were no effects on live performance during the first 2 wk post-hatch. These results show that B. licheniformis and L. animalis are effective candidates for in ovo probiotic administration, but further investigations regarding immuno-physiological responses to in ovo B. licheniformis administration are necessary.
动物乳杆菌、地衣芽孢杆菌或它们的组合对 Ross 708 肉鸡孵化性能和免疫生理参数的影响
在无抗生素家禽生产中,人们需要新的病原体缓解策略,这引发了各种益生菌应用方法的开发。其中一种应用方法是在孵化第 18 天(d)在蛋内添加益生菌,即未孵化的雏鸡在孵化前和暴露于环境病原体前摄入益生菌。因此,本研究的目的是评估蛋内添加动物乳杆菌、地衣芽孢杆菌或动物乳杆菌+地衣芽孢杆菌(各106 cfu/50 μL)对 Ross 708 肉用仔鸡孵化性能(N = 21 个蛋单位/处理,30 个蛋/蛋单位)、活体性能(N = 12 个鸡栏/处理)和孵化 d 免疫生理参数(N = 12 只/处理)的影响。数据采用单因素方差分析,显著性以 P ≤ 0.05 为准。所有卵内益生菌处理的孵化率均高于对照处理,卵内添加地衣芽孢杆菌的鸡蛋的晚期死蛋率和剔除蛋率均较低。然而,与HVT疫苗对照组相比,所有卵内益生菌处理的雏鸡平均体重都较低。孵化时,与对照组相比,使用地衣芽孢杆菌或动物乳杆菌+地衣芽孢杆菌的雏鸡盲肠相对重量更大,外周血白细胞水平更低。地衣芽孢杆菌对孵化后头两周的成活率没有影响。这些结果表明,地衣芽孢杆菌和动物乳杆菌是在卵中添加益生菌的有效候选物,但有必要进一步研究在卵中添加地衣芽孢杆菌后的免疫生理反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Poultry Research
Journal of Applied Poultry Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
80
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers. The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信