Yong Li , Maofei Ni , Qingying Liu , Qin Liao , Yun Bai , Chuan Li
{"title":"Assessing subgroup differences and underlying causes of ozone-associated mortality burden in China using multi-source data","authors":"Yong Li , Maofei Ni , Qingying Liu , Qin Liao , Yun Bai , Chuan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-term ozone exposure is a significant public health concern. To mitigate its impact, it is crucial to identify diseases, populations, and regions that are particularly sensitive to ozone. In this study, we used high-quality data and updated relative risk estimates to investigate subgroup differences in mortality burden due to ozone exposure in China. In 2020, nationwide ozone-associated deaths totaled 276,800 (95 % CI: 106,700–451,900), representing 3.2 % of all deaths, with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases accounting for 16.8 % and 83.2 %, respectively. The per capita ozone-associated mortality in China was 20 per 100,000 person-years, with a significantly higher rate observed in elderly individuals aged ≥75 years (189 deaths per 100,000) compared to young individuals aged 30–44 years (1 death per 100,000). There were notable spatial patterns of ozone-associated deaths among the regions, indicating a critical response to ozone levels and population density. Interestingly, urban areas exhibited a 22.4 % lower mortality rate related to ozone compared to rural areas. This difference was attributed to the combined influence of ozone exposure (+19.9 %), population size (+17.7 %), age structure (−39.2 %), and baseline mortality (−20.8 %). By emphasizing subgroup differences and driving factors, these findings significantly enhance the understanding of the ozone-associated mortality burden, providing valuable insights for policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Long-term ozone exposure is a significant public health concern. To mitigate its impact, it is crucial to identify diseases, populations, and regions that are particularly sensitive to ozone. In this study, we used high-quality data and updated relative risk estimates to investigate subgroup differences in mortality burden due to ozone exposure in China. In 2020, nationwide ozone-associated deaths totaled 276,800 (95 % CI: 106,700–451,900), representing 3.2 % of all deaths, with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases accounting for 16.8 % and 83.2 %, respectively. The per capita ozone-associated mortality in China was 20 per 100,000 person-years, with a significantly higher rate observed in elderly individuals aged ≥75 years (189 deaths per 100,000) compared to young individuals aged 30–44 years (1 death per 100,000). There were notable spatial patterns of ozone-associated deaths among the regions, indicating a critical response to ozone levels and population density. Interestingly, urban areas exhibited a 22.4 % lower mortality rate related to ozone compared to rural areas. This difference was attributed to the combined influence of ozone exposure (+19.9 %), population size (+17.7 %), age structure (−39.2 %), and baseline mortality (−20.8 %). By emphasizing subgroup differences and driving factors, these findings significantly enhance the understanding of the ozone-associated mortality burden, providing valuable insights for policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas.
As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.