Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of outpatient colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

iGIE Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2024.07.005
Mike T. Wei MD , Shai Friedland MD
{"title":"Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of outpatient colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection","authors":"Mike T. Wei MD ,&nbsp;Shai Friedland MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for resection of benign nonpedunculated colorectal polyps and early cancers. However, there is concern that adoption of ESD may be limited by increased resource utilization with routine postprocedure admission. As endoscopic closure of ESD wounds has improved, in 2022, we adopted an outpatient colorectal ESD protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was a retrospective evaluation of adult patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2022 to April 2023. When technically feasible, the wound was closed by clips or suturing. After the procedure, patients were observed for up to 2 hours and discharged if they had no abdominal pain and no intraoperative muscle injury was present. We evaluated for operative success (en-bloc, R0, and curative resection) as well as safety (postprocedure pain, perforation, delayed bleeding).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred eleven lesions were removed by ESD in 105 consecutive patients. Nineteen lesions (17%) had prior EMR. All lesions were successfully removed: The en-bloc resection rate was 93% and the R0 and curative resection rate was 90%. Ninety-nine wounds (89%) were closed, most commonly using clips (60/111; 54%). Two small intraprocedural perforations occurred, both managed with clip closure, and the patients did not require admission. Among patients with defect closure, there were no delayed bleeds requiring hospitalization and only 1 episode of self-limited bleeding. In contrast, among 12 patients with resection sites not amenable to closure, there were 1 delayed bleed requiring hospitalization, 2 minor bleeds assessed at the emergency department, and 2 self-limited bleeds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this retrospective study, we demonstrated the feasibility of outpatient colorectal ESD. Among 105 patients, only 2 required hospital admission: 1 for postprocedure pain and 1 for delayed bleeding. We found that after endoscopic closure of ESD wounds, hospital admission was generally unnecessary and significant postprocedure bleeding was rare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 413-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294970862400102X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for resection of benign nonpedunculated colorectal polyps and early cancers. However, there is concern that adoption of ESD may be limited by increased resource utilization with routine postprocedure admission. As endoscopic closure of ESD wounds has improved, in 2022, we adopted an outpatient colorectal ESD protocol.

Methods

This study was a retrospective evaluation of adult patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2022 to April 2023. When technically feasible, the wound was closed by clips or suturing. After the procedure, patients were observed for up to 2 hours and discharged if they had no abdominal pain and no intraoperative muscle injury was present. We evaluated for operative success (en-bloc, R0, and curative resection) as well as safety (postprocedure pain, perforation, delayed bleeding).

Results

One hundred eleven lesions were removed by ESD in 105 consecutive patients. Nineteen lesions (17%) had prior EMR. All lesions were successfully removed: The en-bloc resection rate was 93% and the R0 and curative resection rate was 90%. Ninety-nine wounds (89%) were closed, most commonly using clips (60/111; 54%). Two small intraprocedural perforations occurred, both managed with clip closure, and the patients did not require admission. Among patients with defect closure, there were no delayed bleeds requiring hospitalization and only 1 episode of self-limited bleeding. In contrast, among 12 patients with resection sites not amenable to closure, there were 1 delayed bleed requiring hospitalization, 2 minor bleeds assessed at the emergency department, and 2 self-limited bleeds.

Conclusions

In this retrospective study, we demonstrated the feasibility of outpatient colorectal ESD. Among 105 patients, only 2 required hospital admission: 1 for postprocedure pain and 1 for delayed bleeding. We found that after endoscopic closure of ESD wounds, hospital admission was generally unnecessary and significant postprocedure bleeding was rare.
评估门诊大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的安全性和可行性
背景和目的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)越来越多地用于切除良性非截石性大肠息肉和早期癌症。然而,人们担心ESD的采用可能会受到术后常规入院所增加的资源利用率的限制。随着ESD伤口的内镜闭合技术不断改进,2022年,我们采用了门诊结直肠ESD方案。方法本研究是对2022年1月至2023年4月期间接受结直肠ESD的成年患者进行的回顾性评估。在技术可行的情况下,用夹子或缝合器缝合伤口。术后,我们对患者进行了长达 2 小时的观察,如果患者无腹痛且术中无肌肉损伤,即可出院。我们对手术成功率(全切、R0、根治性切除)和安全性(术后疼痛、穿孔、延迟出血)进行了评估。19个病灶(17%)曾接受过EMR。所有病灶均成功切除:全切率为 93%,R0 和根治性切除率为 90%。99处伤口(89%)被缝合,最常见的是使用夹子(60/111;54%)。发生了两例小的术中穿孔,均用夹子缝合,患者无需入院。在进行缺损闭合的患者中,没有需要住院治疗的延迟性出血,只有一次自限性出血。与此相反,在 12 名切除部位不适合闭合的患者中,有 1 例延迟出血需要住院治疗,2 例轻微出血在急诊科进行了评估,2 例为自限性出血。在 105 名患者中,只有 2 人需要入院治疗:1 人因术后疼痛入院,1 人因延迟出血入院。我们发现,在内窥镜下闭合ESD伤口后,一般不需要入院治疗,术后大出血的情况也很少见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信