Personalized approaches to the prescription of protein-based oral nutritional supplements in older adults: A scoping review

Q3 Nursing
Catherine M. Fallon , Clare A. Corish , Katy Horner , Caitriona Cunningham
{"title":"Personalized approaches to the prescription of protein-based oral nutritional supplements in older adults: A scoping review","authors":"Catherine M. Fallon ,&nbsp;Clare A. Corish ,&nbsp;Katy Horner ,&nbsp;Caitriona Cunningham","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are prescribed for older adults with malnutrition and sarcopenia to prevent nutritional and functional deterioration. Studies investigating ONS effectiveness commonly provide the same ONS prescription for participants. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of studies that have personalized ONS prescription in older adults with malnutrition or sarcopenia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In July 2023, PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched for studies wherein older adults with malnutrition, risk of malnutrition or sarcopenia received personalized ONS. Data extracted were synthesized into tables and descriptively summarized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all in developed countries: 10 randomized controlled, 3 cross-over, 1 non-randomized and 1 single-arm trials. Fourteen studies included older adults at risk of malnutrition/malnourished. One study included older adults with sarcopenia. Studies included between 34 and 671 participants aged 70–88 years. Dietitians (10 studies) or trained nutritionists (5 studies) personalized the ONS prescription. Personalization included: (i) providing ONS for protein requirements based on weight (11 studies) or (ii) current dietary intake (2 studies), or (iii) offering ONS flavors based on personal preference (2 studies). Outcome measures included nutritional status, change in body weight/composition and quality of life. Definition and methods of assessing adherence varied. Seven studies showed a significant improvement in primary outcomes when personalized ONS were prescribed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>15 studies which personalized ONS for older adults with malnutrition/sarcopenia were identified. Further research on optimizing personalized approaches with standardized outcome measures is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 80-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are prescribed for older adults with malnutrition and sarcopenia to prevent nutritional and functional deterioration. Studies investigating ONS effectiveness commonly provide the same ONS prescription for participants. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of studies that have personalized ONS prescription in older adults with malnutrition or sarcopenia.

Methods

In July 2023, PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched for studies wherein older adults with malnutrition, risk of malnutrition or sarcopenia received personalized ONS. Data extracted were synthesized into tables and descriptively summarized.

Results

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all in developed countries: 10 randomized controlled, 3 cross-over, 1 non-randomized and 1 single-arm trials. Fourteen studies included older adults at risk of malnutrition/malnourished. One study included older adults with sarcopenia. Studies included between 34 and 671 participants aged 70–88 years. Dietitians (10 studies) or trained nutritionists (5 studies) personalized the ONS prescription. Personalization included: (i) providing ONS for protein requirements based on weight (11 studies) or (ii) current dietary intake (2 studies), or (iii) offering ONS flavors based on personal preference (2 studies). Outcome measures included nutritional status, change in body weight/composition and quality of life. Definition and methods of assessing adherence varied. Seven studies showed a significant improvement in primary outcomes when personalized ONS were prescribed.

Conclusion

15 studies which personalized ONS for older adults with malnutrition/sarcopenia were identified. Further research on optimizing personalized approaches with standardized outcome measures is warranted.
老年人蛋白质口服营养补充剂处方的个性化方法:范围综述
背景和目的口服营养补充剂(ONS)是针对营养不良和肌肉疏松症老年人的处方,以防止营养和功能退化。调查口服营养补充剂有效性的研究通常为参与者提供相同的口服营养补充剂处方。本范围综述旨在概述针对营养不良或肌肉疏松症老年人的个性化 ONS 处方的研究。方法在 2023 年 7 月,检索了 PubMed、CINAHL、SCOPUS 和 EMBASE 中有关营养不良、有营养不良风险或肌肉疏松症的老年人接受个性化 ONS 的研究。结果15项研究符合纳入标准,全部来自发达国家:10 项随机对照试验、3 项交叉试验、1 项非随机试验和 1 项单臂试验。14 项研究纳入了有营养不良风险/营养不良的老年人。一项研究纳入了患有肌肉疏松症的老年人。研究纳入了 34 至 671 名年龄在 70-88 岁之间的参与者。营养师(10 项研究)或训练有素的营养学家(5 项研究)对 ONS 处方进行了个性化处理。个性化处方包括(i) 根据体重(11 项研究)或 (ii) 当前膳食摄入量(2 项研究)提供 ONS 以满足蛋白质需求,或 (iii) 根据个人偏好提供 ONS 口味(2 项研究)。结果测量包括营养状况、体重/体型变化和生活质量。评估依从性的定义和方法各不相同。有 7 项研究表明,处方个性化 ONS 后,主要结果有明显改善。有必要进一步研究如何通过标准化的结果测量来优化个性化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信