Álvaro Díaz-González , Noelia Fontanillas , Eva Gil-Hernández , Mercedes Guilabert , Maria-Carlota Londoño , Mar Noguerol , Fernando Pérez Escanilla , José J. Mira , Manuel Santiñá
{"title":"Recommendations and quality criteria to improve the early diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis","authors":"Álvaro Díaz-González , Noelia Fontanillas , Eva Gil-Hernández , Mercedes Guilabert , Maria-Carlota Londoño , Mar Noguerol , Fernando Pérez Escanilla , José J. Mira , Manuel Santiñá","doi":"10.1016/j.gastre.2024.04.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to establish recommendations and quality criteria to enhance the healthcare process of PBC.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>It was conducted using qualitative techniques, preceded by a literature review. A consensus conference involving five specialists in the field was held, followed by a Delphi process developed in two waves, in which 30 specialist physicians in family and community medicine, digestive system and internal medicine were invited to participate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven recommendations and 15 sets of quality criteria, indicators and standards were obtained. Those with the highest consensus were «Know the impact on the patient’s quality of life. Consider their point of view and agree on recommendations and care» and «Evaluate possible fibrosis at the time of diagnosis and during PBC follow-up, assessing the evolution of factors associated with poor disease prognosis: noninvasive fibrosis (elastography > 2.1 kPa/year), GGT, ALP and bilirubin annually», respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The implementation of the consensus recommendations and criteria would provide better patient care. The need for multidisciplinary follow-up and an increased role of primary care is emphasized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100569,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition)","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 834-844"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444382424001329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The study aimed to establish recommendations and quality criteria to enhance the healthcare process of PBC.
Patients and methods
It was conducted using qualitative techniques, preceded by a literature review. A consensus conference involving five specialists in the field was held, followed by a Delphi process developed in two waves, in which 30 specialist physicians in family and community medicine, digestive system and internal medicine were invited to participate.
Results
Seven recommendations and 15 sets of quality criteria, indicators and standards were obtained. Those with the highest consensus were «Know the impact on the patient’s quality of life. Consider their point of view and agree on recommendations and care» and «Evaluate possible fibrosis at the time of diagnosis and during PBC follow-up, assessing the evolution of factors associated with poor disease prognosis: noninvasive fibrosis (elastography > 2.1 kPa/year), GGT, ALP and bilirubin annually», respectively.
Conclusions
The implementation of the consensus recommendations and criteria would provide better patient care. The need for multidisciplinary follow-up and an increased role of primary care is emphasized.