Enhancing the antibacterial effect of dental adhesives with DMAHDM by incorporating MPC monomer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies
Francisca Jennifer Duarte de Oliveira , Bárbara Faria de Sá Barbosa , Mariana Silva de Bessa , Kaiza de Sousa Santos , Moan Jéfter Fernandes Costa , Diana Ferreira Gadelha de Araújo , Victor Pinheiro Feitosa , Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges
{"title":"Enhancing the antibacterial effect of dental adhesives with DMAHDM by incorporating MPC monomer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies","authors":"Francisca Jennifer Duarte de Oliveira , Bárbara Faria de Sá Barbosa , Mariana Silva de Bessa , Kaiza de Sousa Santos , Moan Jéfter Fernandes Costa , Diana Ferreira Gadelha de Araújo , Victor Pinheiro Feitosa , Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to analyze if the combination of MPC and DMAHDM can enhance the antibacterial potential of DMAHDM without impairing the adhesive system's bond strength.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Study selection was performed in two stages by two calibrated reviewers independently. The meta-analyses were conducted with the RevMan 5.4 software and evaluated metabolic activity (MA), lactic acid production (LA), protein repellent function (PRF), and dentin shear bond strength (DSBS) comparing DMAHDM vs. DMAHDM + MPC. The measure of effect was the mean or standardized mean difference. Quality assessment was evaluated with an adapted tool from a previous systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The initial search resulted in 158 articles. Four articles were included in the final sample. The meta-analyses evidenced a statistically significant difference favoring the use of MPC to enhance DMAHDM's antibacterial potential for inhibiting MA (SMD, 3.74; 95 % CI, 2.66, 4.83), LA (MD, −1.24; 95 % CI, −1.42, −1.06), while providing protein-repellent function (MD, −5.38; 95 % CI, −6.35, −4.41). The addition of MPC had a negative effect on DSBS in comparison to DMAHDM alone (MD, −4.23; 95 % CI, −5.63, −2.83).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of MPC to DMAHDM-containing adhesives enhances the antibacterial efficacy and provides protein-repellent function, but impairs the bond strength. Future studies should test the addition of 5 % MPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13732,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103849"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749624002318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This systematic review aims to analyze if the combination of MPC and DMAHDM can enhance the antibacterial potential of DMAHDM without impairing the adhesive system's bond strength.
Methods
A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Study selection was performed in two stages by two calibrated reviewers independently. The meta-analyses were conducted with the RevMan 5.4 software and evaluated metabolic activity (MA), lactic acid production (LA), protein repellent function (PRF), and dentin shear bond strength (DSBS) comparing DMAHDM vs. DMAHDM + MPC. The measure of effect was the mean or standardized mean difference. Quality assessment was evaluated with an adapted tool from a previous systematic review.
Results
The initial search resulted in 158 articles. Four articles were included in the final sample. The meta-analyses evidenced a statistically significant difference favoring the use of MPC to enhance DMAHDM's antibacterial potential for inhibiting MA (SMD, 3.74; 95 % CI, 2.66, 4.83), LA (MD, −1.24; 95 % CI, −1.42, −1.06), while providing protein-repellent function (MD, −5.38; 95 % CI, −6.35, −4.41). The addition of MPC had a negative effect on DSBS in comparison to DMAHDM alone (MD, −4.23; 95 % CI, −5.63, −2.83).
Conclusions
The addition of MPC to DMAHDM-containing adhesives enhances the antibacterial efficacy and provides protein-repellent function, but impairs the bond strength. Future studies should test the addition of 5 % MPC.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives draws together the many aspects of the science and technology of adhesive materials, from fundamental research and development work to industrial applications. Subject areas covered include: interfacial interactions, surface chemistry, methods of testing, accumulation of test data on physical and mechanical properties, environmental effects, new adhesive materials, sealants, design of bonded joints, and manufacturing technology.