Fanny Mikula MD , Alex Farr MD, PhD, MPH , Tim Dorittke MD , Anja Catic MD , Florian Heinzl Mag. , Bernhard Roessler MD, PhD , Katharina Adelwoehrer MD , Philipp Foessleitner MD , Eva Karner MD , Veronica Falcone MD, PhD
{"title":"Training of Shoulder Dystocia Using Virtual Reality: A Feasibility Study","authors":"Fanny Mikula MD , Alex Farr MD, PhD, MPH , Tim Dorittke MD , Anja Catic MD , Florian Heinzl Mag. , Bernhard Roessler MD, PhD , Katharina Adelwoehrer MD , Philipp Foessleitner MD , Eva Karner MD , Veronica Falcone MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulation training is an important aspect of obstetric education but high-fidelity simulation is resource-intensive. This study aimed to evaluate Virtual Reality (VR) technology for simulation training of shoulder dystocia (SD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Trainees were instructed on the technological aspects. Consequently, they managed a SD scenario in VR, following a standardized algorithm. Self-evaluation of nontechnical skills and task demands was conducted using the modified Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument and the NASA Task Load Index questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 44 participants, who completed the scenario within a five minute time-limit. There was a significant decrease in time-to-delivery, from 136 (106-181) seconds on the first to 88 (69-135) seconds on the second attempt. Qualitative analysis indicated a high self-perceived initial human skills level and a high degree of effort with 11 (7-13) points, mental (12 [7-15]), and temporal (11.5 [9-15]) demands during training.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VR is a modern, feasible, and effective option for simulation training for SD. Randomized controlled trials are required to further evaluate this training modality in obstetric medical education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101623"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Simulation training is an important aspect of obstetric education but high-fidelity simulation is resource-intensive. This study aimed to evaluate Virtual Reality (VR) technology for simulation training of shoulder dystocia (SD).
Methods
Trainees were instructed on the technological aspects. Consequently, they managed a SD scenario in VR, following a standardized algorithm. Self-evaluation of nontechnical skills and task demands was conducted using the modified Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument and the NASA Task Load Index questionnaire.
Results
We included 44 participants, who completed the scenario within a five minute time-limit. There was a significant decrease in time-to-delivery, from 136 (106-181) seconds on the first to 88 (69-135) seconds on the second attempt. Qualitative analysis indicated a high self-perceived initial human skills level and a high degree of effort with 11 (7-13) points, mental (12 [7-15]), and temporal (11.5 [9-15]) demands during training.
Conclusions
VR is a modern, feasible, and effective option for simulation training for SD. Randomized controlled trials are required to further evaluate this training modality in obstetric medical education.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.