Effect of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on body composition in people with osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of the “Plants for Joints” randomized controlled trial

C.A. Wagenaar , W. Walrabenstein , C.S. de Jonge , M. Bisschops , M. van der Leeden , M. van der Esch , P.J.M. Weijs , M.A. Troelstra , M.A. Korteweg , A.J. Nederveen , D. van Schaardenburg
{"title":"Effect of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on body composition in people with osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of the “Plants for Joints” randomized controlled trial","authors":"C.A. Wagenaar ,&nbsp;W. Walrabenstein ,&nbsp;C.S. de Jonge ,&nbsp;M. Bisschops ,&nbsp;M. van der Leeden ,&nbsp;M. van der Esch ,&nbsp;P.J.M. Weijs ,&nbsp;M.A. Troelstra ,&nbsp;M.A. Korteweg ,&nbsp;A.J. Nederveen ,&nbsp;D. van Schaardenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Plants for Joints (PFJ) intervention significantly improved pain, stiffness, and physical function, and metabolic outcomes, in people with metabolic syndrome-associated osteoarthritis (MSOA). This secondary analysis investigated its effects on body composition.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In the randomized PFJ study, people with MSOA followed a 16-week intervention based on a whole-food plant-based diet, physical activity, and stress management, or usual care. For this secondary analysis, fat mass, muscle mass, and bone mineral density were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for all participants. Additionally, in a subgroup (<em>n</em> ​= ​32), hepatocellular lipid (HCL) content and composition of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). An intention-to-treat analysis with a linear-mixed model adjusted for baseline values was used to analyse between-group differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 66 people randomized, 64 (97%) completed the study. The PFJ group experienced significant weight loss (−5.2 ​kg; 95% CI –6.9, −3.6) compared to controls, primarily from fat mass reduction (−3.9 ​kg; 95% CI –5.3 to −2.5). No significant differences were found in lean mass, muscle strength, or bone mineral density between groups. In the subgroup who underwent MRI scans, the PFJ group had a greater reduction in HCL (−6.5%; 95% CI –9.9, 3.0) compared to controls, with no observed differences in VAT composition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PFJ multidisciplinary intervention positively impacted clinical and metabolic outcomes, and appears to significantly reduce body fat, including liver fat, while preserving muscle mass and strength.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The Plants for Joints (PFJ) intervention significantly improved pain, stiffness, and physical function, and metabolic outcomes, in people with metabolic syndrome-associated osteoarthritis (MSOA). This secondary analysis investigated its effects on body composition.

Method

In the randomized PFJ study, people with MSOA followed a 16-week intervention based on a whole-food plant-based diet, physical activity, and stress management, or usual care. For this secondary analysis, fat mass, muscle mass, and bone mineral density were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for all participants. Additionally, in a subgroup (n ​= ​32), hepatocellular lipid (HCL) content and composition of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). An intention-to-treat analysis with a linear-mixed model adjusted for baseline values was used to analyse between-group differences.

Results

Of 66 people randomized, 64 (97%) completed the study. The PFJ group experienced significant weight loss (−5.2 ​kg; 95% CI –6.9, −3.6) compared to controls, primarily from fat mass reduction (−3.9 ​kg; 95% CI –5.3 to −2.5). No significant differences were found in lean mass, muscle strength, or bone mineral density between groups. In the subgroup who underwent MRI scans, the PFJ group had a greater reduction in HCL (−6.5%; 95% CI –9.9, 3.0) compared to controls, with no observed differences in VAT composition.

Conclusion

The PFJ multidisciplinary intervention positively impacted clinical and metabolic outcomes, and appears to significantly reduce body fat, including liver fat, while preserving muscle mass and strength.
多学科生活方式干预对骨关节炎患者身体成分的影响:关节植物 "随机对照试验的二次分析
目的 "关节植物"(PFJ)干预能明显改善代谢综合征相关骨关节炎(MSOA)患者的疼痛、僵硬、身体功能和代谢结果。在随机PFJ研究中,MSOA患者接受了为期16周的干预,干预内容包括全食物植物性饮食、体育锻炼、压力管理或常规护理。在这项二次分析中,所有参与者的脂肪量、肌肉量和骨矿物质密度均通过双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DEXA)进行了测量。此外,在一个亚组(n = 32)中,使用磁共振波谱(MRS)测量了肝细胞脂质(HCL)含量和内脏脂肪组织(VAT)的组成。采用调整基线值的线性混合模型进行意向治疗分析,以分析组间差异。与对照组相比,PFJ 组体重明显下降(-5.2 千克;95% CI -6.9,-3.6),主要是脂肪量减少(-3.9 千克;95% CI -5.3,-2.5)。各组之间在瘦体重、肌肉力量或骨质密度方面没有发现明显差异。在接受核磁共振扫描的亚组中,与对照组相比,PFJ 组的 HCL 减少幅度更大(-6.5%;95% CI -9.9,3.0),但在 VAT 组成方面未观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信