Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Among Veterans: A Latent Class Analysis

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Galina A. Portnoy, Mark R. Relyea, Aliya R. Webermann, Candice Presseau, Katherine M. Iverson, Cynthia A. Brandt, Sally G. Haskell
{"title":"Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Among Veterans: A Latent Class Analysis","authors":"Galina A. Portnoy, Mark R. Relyea, Aliya R. Webermann, Candice Presseau, Katherine M. Iverson, Cynthia A. Brandt, Sally G. Haskell","doi":"10.1177/08862605241284087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The majority of intimate partner violence (IPV) research is unidirectional, focusing on IPV use (i.e., perpetration) or experience (i.e., victimization). However, when IPV use and experience data are simultaneously included in analyses, bidirectional IPV often emerges as a common IPV pattern. The objective of this study was to examine patterns of IPV use and experience, risk factors that may be associated with these patterns, and potential gender differences within a sample of post-9/11 Veterans. This study included a national sample of post-9/11 Veterans ( N = 1,150; 50.3% women) who completed self-report measures at two timepoints. We performed a latent class analysis (LCA) to determine the appropriate number of IPV classes, conducted sensitivity analyses, and examined factors potentially associated with IPV class membership. We identified three distinct classes of IPV: Low to no IPV, Bidirectional Psychological IPV, and Bidirectional Multiform IPV. Men and women reported similar rates of IPV use and experience, and there were no gender differences in the LCA model. However, race and ethnicity, employment status, children in the household, marital status, child abuse or witnessing family violence, lifetime physical assault, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and binge drinking were differentially associated with class membership. This study extends existing knowledge on patterns of IPV among Veterans and factors associated with these patterns. Bidirectional IPV was the most common IPV pattern, underscoring the importance of examining IPV use and experience concurrently within research and clinical samples, and developing comprehensive IPV screening and treatment strategies that incorporate bidirectional IPV in work to advance relationship health and safety among Veterans.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241284087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of intimate partner violence (IPV) research is unidirectional, focusing on IPV use (i.e., perpetration) or experience (i.e., victimization). However, when IPV use and experience data are simultaneously included in analyses, bidirectional IPV often emerges as a common IPV pattern. The objective of this study was to examine patterns of IPV use and experience, risk factors that may be associated with these patterns, and potential gender differences within a sample of post-9/11 Veterans. This study included a national sample of post-9/11 Veterans ( N = 1,150; 50.3% women) who completed self-report measures at two timepoints. We performed a latent class analysis (LCA) to determine the appropriate number of IPV classes, conducted sensitivity analyses, and examined factors potentially associated with IPV class membership. We identified three distinct classes of IPV: Low to no IPV, Bidirectional Psychological IPV, and Bidirectional Multiform IPV. Men and women reported similar rates of IPV use and experience, and there were no gender differences in the LCA model. However, race and ethnicity, employment status, children in the household, marital status, child abuse or witnessing family violence, lifetime physical assault, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and binge drinking were differentially associated with class membership. This study extends existing knowledge on patterns of IPV among Veterans and factors associated with these patterns. Bidirectional IPV was the most common IPV pattern, underscoring the importance of examining IPV use and experience concurrently within research and clinical samples, and developing comprehensive IPV screening and treatment strategies that incorporate bidirectional IPV in work to advance relationship health and safety among Veterans.
退伍军人中亲密伴侣暴力的模式:潜类分析
大多数亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)研究都是单向的,侧重于 IPV 的使用(即施暴)或经历(即受害)。然而,当 IPV 使用和经历数据同时纳入分析时,双向 IPV 往往成为一种常见的 IPV 模式。本研究的目的是研究 IPV 使用和经历的模式、可能与这些模式相关的风险因素以及 9/11 事件后退伍军人样本中潜在的性别差异。这项研究包括全国 9/11 后退伍军人样本(N = 1,150; 50.3% 为女性),他们在两个时间点完成了自我报告测量。我们进行了潜类分析 (LCA),以确定 IPV 类别的适当数量,进行了敏感性分析,并研究了与 IPV 类别成员资格可能相关的因素。我们确定了三种不同的 IPV 类别:低度至无 IPV、双向心理 IPV 和双向多种形式 IPV。男性和女性的 IPV 使用率和经历相似,在 LCA 模型中也没有性别差异。然而,种族和民族、就业状况、家庭中的子女、婚姻状况、虐待儿童或目睹家庭暴力、终生遭受人身攻击、创伤后应激症状和酗酒与阶级成员有不同的关联。这项研究扩展了退伍军人中 IPV 模式及其相关因素的现有知识。双向 IPV 是最常见的 IPV 模式,这强调了在研究和临床样本中同时检查 IPV 使用和经历的重要性,以及制定全面的 IPV 筛查和治疗策略的重要性,这些策略将双向 IPV 纳入到促进退伍军人关系健康和安全的工作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信