{"title":"Evaluation of infiltration models based on simple multicriteria decision making across various soil types and land uses in India","authors":"Tridiv Ghosh, Bappa Das, Debasish Roy, Debashis Chakraborty, Deepak Sethi","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11872-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Characterization of soil infiltration is crucial for designing and assessing hydrological processes. The study aimed to characterize the infiltration across various soil types (ranging from fine to moderately coarse in texture), agricultural land uses (including paddy fields, fallow lands, and upland crops) and major soil groups in India using Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, Holtan, Green and Ampt, and modified Kostiakov models. The mean basic infiltration rate was maximum in medium-texture soil (7.0 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), followed by moderately fine (4.6 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), fine (3.7 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), and moderately coarse (3.2 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>) soils. Under paddy, fallow land uses and upland crops, the values of basic infiltration rate were 2.5, 4.1 and 5.3 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>, respectively. Across major soil groups, a significant variations in basic infiltration rates were observed among different soil types. Particularly, the highest infiltration rate was recorded in brown hill soil (8.1 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>); conversely, the lowest infiltration rate was in black soil (3.2 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), attributed to the predominance of montmorillonite clay. By using rank-based multicriteria decision making, the Philip model was found to be the overall best-performing model. The Kostiakov model came in close second phase. Moreover, depending on the kind of land cover, Philip model outperformed other models, while Kostiakov fared better in upland crops and paddy fields. Additionally, Philip’s model also performed better than other infiltration models across a range of soil textures. The study emphasized the significane of choosing suitable models to appropriately quantify the infiltration across a range of hydrological and agricultural contexts by highlighting the effects of soil texture, land use, and soil type on infiltration rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11872-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Characterization of soil infiltration is crucial for designing and assessing hydrological processes. The study aimed to characterize the infiltration across various soil types (ranging from fine to moderately coarse in texture), agricultural land uses (including paddy fields, fallow lands, and upland crops) and major soil groups in India using Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, Holtan, Green and Ampt, and modified Kostiakov models. The mean basic infiltration rate was maximum in medium-texture soil (7.0 cm h− 1), followed by moderately fine (4.6 cm h− 1), fine (3.7 cm h− 1), and moderately coarse (3.2 cm h− 1) soils. Under paddy, fallow land uses and upland crops, the values of basic infiltration rate were 2.5, 4.1 and 5.3 cm h− 1, respectively. Across major soil groups, a significant variations in basic infiltration rates were observed among different soil types. Particularly, the highest infiltration rate was recorded in brown hill soil (8.1 cm h− 1); conversely, the lowest infiltration rate was in black soil (3.2 cm h− 1), attributed to the predominance of montmorillonite clay. By using rank-based multicriteria decision making, the Philip model was found to be the overall best-performing model. The Kostiakov model came in close second phase. Moreover, depending on the kind of land cover, Philip model outperformed other models, while Kostiakov fared better in upland crops and paddy fields. Additionally, Philip’s model also performed better than other infiltration models across a range of soil textures. The study emphasized the significane of choosing suitable models to appropriately quantify the infiltration across a range of hydrological and agricultural contexts by highlighting the effects of soil texture, land use, and soil type on infiltration rates.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.