Shear behavior of RC beams with openings under impact loads: unveiling the effects of HSC and RECC

IF 4.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ahmad G. Saad, Mohammed A. Sakr, Tarek M. Khalifa, Esam A. Darwish
{"title":"Shear behavior of RC beams with openings under impact loads: unveiling the effects of HSC and RECC","authors":"Ahmad G. Saad,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Sakr,&nbsp;Tarek M. Khalifa,&nbsp;Esam A. Darwish","doi":"10.1007/s43452-024-01041-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incorporating transverse openings in reinforced concrete (RC) beams reduces their load-bearing capacity and stiffness, making them prone to premature failure. This highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of their behavior to ensure structural integrity, particularly under impact loads. This research delves into a relatively unexplored area, investigating the impact performance of RC beams containing openings through numerical analysis. By comparing different concrete types, the study seeks to identify optimal materials for such applications. The concrete damage plasticity model, accounting for strain rate effects, will be employed to simulate the material behavior of normal-strength concrete (NSC), high-strength concrete (HSC), and a novel eco-friendly alternative: rubberized engineered cementitious composite (RECC). RECC incorporates recycled tire rubber as a partial substitute for traditional concrete aggregates, offering a sustainable solution while mitigating environmental hazards associated with waste tire incineration. The finite element models are validated with experimental results, accurately predicting ultimate capacities, failure modes, and post-cracking response in RC beams (with/without openings) under static/impact loads. A comprehensive parametric analysis investigates the effects of concrete strength, impact energy, impactor mass, drop height, and opening location, providing valuable insights into how these factors influence the impact behavior under drop-weight testing. The results reveal that openings in RC beams under impact loads significantly reduce strength and stiffness, with detrimental effects observed for dual shear-zone openings. Surprisingly, a small mid-span opening can enhance impact response. HSC beams exhibit lower initial displacements but higher residual values, while RECC improves overall behavior in beams with openings, reducing maximum displacement and promoting energy dissipation for improved post-impact recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55474,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43452-024-01041-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-024-01041-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating transverse openings in reinforced concrete (RC) beams reduces their load-bearing capacity and stiffness, making them prone to premature failure. This highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of their behavior to ensure structural integrity, particularly under impact loads. This research delves into a relatively unexplored area, investigating the impact performance of RC beams containing openings through numerical analysis. By comparing different concrete types, the study seeks to identify optimal materials for such applications. The concrete damage plasticity model, accounting for strain rate effects, will be employed to simulate the material behavior of normal-strength concrete (NSC), high-strength concrete (HSC), and a novel eco-friendly alternative: rubberized engineered cementitious composite (RECC). RECC incorporates recycled tire rubber as a partial substitute for traditional concrete aggregates, offering a sustainable solution while mitigating environmental hazards associated with waste tire incineration. The finite element models are validated with experimental results, accurately predicting ultimate capacities, failure modes, and post-cracking response in RC beams (with/without openings) under static/impact loads. A comprehensive parametric analysis investigates the effects of concrete strength, impact energy, impactor mass, drop height, and opening location, providing valuable insights into how these factors influence the impact behavior under drop-weight testing. The results reveal that openings in RC beams under impact loads significantly reduce strength and stiffness, with detrimental effects observed for dual shear-zone openings. Surprisingly, a small mid-span opening can enhance impact response. HSC beams exhibit lower initial displacements but higher residual values, while RECC improves overall behavior in beams with openings, reducing maximum displacement and promoting energy dissipation for improved post-impact recovery.

带开口的 RC 梁在冲击荷载下的剪切行为:揭示 HSC 和 RECC 的影响
在钢筋混凝土(RC)梁中加入横向开口会降低其承载能力和刚度,使其容易过早失效。这凸显了对其行为进行更细致入微的了解的必要性,以确保结构的完整性,尤其是在冲击荷载作用下。本研究深入到一个相对未开发的领域,通过数值分析研究含有开口的 RC 梁的冲击性能。通过比较不同类型的混凝土,该研究试图确定此类应用的最佳材料。在考虑应变率效应的情况下,将采用混凝土损伤塑性模型模拟正常强度混凝土 (NSC)、高强度混凝土 (HSC) 和新型环保替代材料:橡胶工程水泥基复合材料 (RECC) 的材料行为。RECC 采用回收轮胎橡胶作为传统混凝土骨料的部分替代品,提供了一种可持续的解决方案,同时减轻了与废轮胎焚烧相关的环境危害。有限元模型与实验结果进行了验证,准确预测了 RC 梁(带/不带开口)在静态/冲击荷载下的极限承载力、破坏模式和开裂后响应。全面的参数分析研究了混凝土强度、冲击能量、冲击器质量、下落高度和开口位置的影响,为了解这些因素如何影响落重测试下的冲击行为提供了宝贵的见解。结果表明,在冲击荷载作用下,RC 梁上的开口会显著降低强度和刚度,双剪切区开口会产生不利影响。令人惊讶的是,小跨中开孔可以增强冲击响应。HSC 梁的初始位移较低,但残余值较高,而 RECC 可改善带开口梁的整体性能,减少最大位移并促进能量耗散,从而改善冲击后的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
201
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering (ACME) publishes both theoretical and experimental original research articles which explore or exploit new ideas and techniques in three main areas: structural engineering, mechanics of materials and materials science. The aim of the journal is to advance science related to structural engineering focusing on structures, machines and mechanical systems. The journal also promotes advancement in the area of mechanics of materials, by publishing most recent findings in elasticity, plasticity, rheology, fatigue and fracture mechanics. The third area the journal is concentrating on is materials science, with emphasis on metals, composites, etc., their structures and properties as well as methods of evaluation. In addition to research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes state-of-the-art reviews on specialized topics. All such articles have to be sent to the Editor-in-Chief before submission for pre-submission review process. Only articles approved by the Editor-in-Chief in pre-submission process can be submitted to the journal for further processing. Approval in pre-submission stage doesn''t guarantee acceptance for publication as all papers are subject to a regular referee procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信