One-dimensional wave theory analysis of factors and characteristics influencing errors in two-wave method data processing in SHPB

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Minghui Ma  (, ), Guangfa Gao  (, )
{"title":"One-dimensional wave theory analysis of factors and characteristics influencing errors in two-wave method data processing in SHPB","authors":"Minghui Ma \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Guangfa Gao \n (,&nbsp;)","doi":"10.1007/s10409-024-24169-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A simplified calculation of the specimen’s stress-strain curve is generally conducted using the two-wave method by the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), which aligns the onset of the transmitted and reflected waves. However, this approach neglects the travel time of elastic waves within the specimen. Considering the travel time of elastic waves, this study quantitatively investigates the error characteristics and patterns of stress, strain, and strain rate in the specimen under different conditions using the theoretical two-wave method, and compares the results with those obtained using the onset-aligned two-wave method. The study reveals that the stress-time curves derived from the theoretical two-wave method are lower than the actual stress curves, whereas those obtained from the onset-aligned two-wave method are consistently higher than the actual stress curves, with the stress deviation approximating a constant value when the dimensionless time exceeds 2.0. The starting point of the stress-strain curves obtained by the theoretical two-wave method is not zero but a point on the strain axis, whereas the onset-aligned two-wave method always starts at zero. However, the slopes of the stress-strain curves obtained by both methods differ from the actual Young’s modulus of the material, and functional relationships between the slopes and the actual Young’s modulus are provided. This research offers theoretical guidance for the refined design of SHPB experiments and the accurate processing of data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7109,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10409-024-24169-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A simplified calculation of the specimen’s stress-strain curve is generally conducted using the two-wave method by the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), which aligns the onset of the transmitted and reflected waves. However, this approach neglects the travel time of elastic waves within the specimen. Considering the travel time of elastic waves, this study quantitatively investigates the error characteristics and patterns of stress, strain, and strain rate in the specimen under different conditions using the theoretical two-wave method, and compares the results with those obtained using the onset-aligned two-wave method. The study reveals that the stress-time curves derived from the theoretical two-wave method are lower than the actual stress curves, whereas those obtained from the onset-aligned two-wave method are consistently higher than the actual stress curves, with the stress deviation approximating a constant value when the dimensionless time exceeds 2.0. The starting point of the stress-strain curves obtained by the theoretical two-wave method is not zero but a point on the strain axis, whereas the onset-aligned two-wave method always starts at zero. However, the slopes of the stress-strain curves obtained by both methods differ from the actual Young’s modulus of the material, and functional relationships between the slopes and the actual Young’s modulus are provided. This research offers theoretical guidance for the refined design of SHPB experiments and the accurate processing of data.

一维波浪理论对影响 SHPB 双波法数据处理误差的因素和特征的分析
试样应力-应变曲线的简化计算一般采用霍普金森分压杆(SHPB)双波法,将透射波和反射波的起始点对齐。然而,这种方法忽略了弹性波在试样内的传播时间。考虑到弹性波的传播时间,本研究采用理论双波法定量研究了试样在不同条件下的应力、应变和应变率的误差特征和模式,并将结果与采用起始点对齐双波法得出的结果进行了比较。研究发现,理论双波法得出的应力-时间曲线低于实际应力曲线,而起始对齐双波法得出的应力-时间曲线始终高于实际应力曲线,当无量纲时间超过 2.0 时,应力偏差近似于恒定值。理论双波法得到的应力-应变曲线的起点不是零,而是应变轴上的一点,而起始对齐双波法的起点总是零。然而,这两种方法得到的应力-应变曲线的斜率与材料的实际杨氏模量不同,斜率与实际杨氏模量之间存在函数关系。这项研究为精细设计 SHPB 实验和准确处理数据提供了理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Mechanica Sinica
Acta Mechanica Sinica 物理-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
1807
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Mechanica Sinica, sponsored by the Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, promotes scientific exchanges and collaboration among Chinese scientists in China and abroad. It features high quality, original papers in all aspects of mechanics and mechanical sciences. Not only does the journal explore the classical subdivisions of theoretical and applied mechanics such as solid and fluid mechanics, it also explores recently emerging areas such as biomechanics and nanomechanics. In addition, the journal investigates analytical, computational, and experimental progresses in all areas of mechanics. Lastly, it encourages research in interdisciplinary subjects, serving as a bridge between mechanics and other branches of engineering and the sciences. In addition to research papers, Acta Mechanica Sinica publishes reviews, notes, experimental techniques, scientific events, and other special topics of interest. Related subjects » Classical Continuum Physics - Computational Intelligence and Complexity - Mechanics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信