[Survey on the State, Potential, and Obstacles of the Digital Transformation in Human Milk Banks].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rudolf Georg Ascherl, Monika Berns, Christoph Fusch, Judith Karger-Seider, Daniel Klotz, Barbara Naust, Ulrike Sturm-Hentschel, Corinna Gebauer
{"title":"[Survey on the State, Potential, and Obstacles of the Digital Transformation in Human Milk Banks].","authors":"Rudolf Georg Ascherl, Monika Berns, Christoph Fusch, Judith Karger-Seider, Daniel Klotz, Barbara Naust, Ulrike Sturm-Hentschel, Corinna Gebauer","doi":"10.1055/a-2405-0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digitalization of human milk banking was examined in a survey among participants of the largest German-speaking symposium for human milk banks. Of the 100 participants, 47% were nurses, 23% were physicians, and 3% were midwives. The overwhelming majority (96%) desired more digitalization in their milk bank. The best-digitized processes were clinical results from donors, milk labeling, and milk orders. At the same time, a discrepancy between the maximum conceivable potential and the current implementation of digital transformation became evident. The survey revealed most participants use in-house digital solutions. Potential main advantages of digitalization were cited as efficiency gains, while implementation efforts and security concerns, particularly power outages and cyberattacks, were seen as disadvantages. Financial restraints, personnel shortage, resistance from local IT departments, and legal concerns were perceived as the biggest barriers. Despite these challenges and a critical examination of the disadvantages, the participants expressed strong optimism and a desire for further digitalization in the human milk bank sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-0336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digitalization of human milk banking was examined in a survey among participants of the largest German-speaking symposium for human milk banks. Of the 100 participants, 47% were nurses, 23% were physicians, and 3% were midwives. The overwhelming majority (96%) desired more digitalization in their milk bank. The best-digitized processes were clinical results from donors, milk labeling, and milk orders. At the same time, a discrepancy between the maximum conceivable potential and the current implementation of digital transformation became evident. The survey revealed most participants use in-house digital solutions. Potential main advantages of digitalization were cited as efficiency gains, while implementation efforts and security concerns, particularly power outages and cyberattacks, were seen as disadvantages. Financial restraints, personnel shortage, resistance from local IT departments, and legal concerns were perceived as the biggest barriers. Despite these challenges and a critical examination of the disadvantages, the participants expressed strong optimism and a desire for further digitalization in the human milk bank sector.

[母乳库数字化转型的现状、潜力和障碍调查]。
在德语区规模最大的母乳库研讨会上,对与会者进行了一项调查,研究了母乳库的数字化问题。在 100 名与会者中,47% 是护士,23% 是医生,3% 是助产士。绝大多数人(96%)希望他们的母乳库能实现更多数字化。数字化程度最高的流程是捐献者的临床结果、牛奶标签和牛奶订单。与此同时,数字化转型的最大潜力与当前实施情况之间的差距也显而易见。调查显示,大多数参与者使用的是内部数字化解决方案。数字化的潜在主要优势被认为是提高效率,而实施工作和安全问题,特别是断电和网络攻击,则被视为劣势。资金限制、人员短缺、地方信息技术部门的抵制以及法律问题被视为最大的障碍。尽管存在这些挑战并对不利因素进行了严格审查,但与会者仍对母乳库部门的进一步数字化表示出强烈的乐观和愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信