Chang Liu, Yanlin Huang, Yunan Wang, Yan Zhang, Li Du, Lihua Yu, Hongke Ding, Fake Li, Yiming Qi, Yuan Liu, Xingwang Wang, Fangfang Guo, Ying Xiong, Xin Zhao, Liyuan Fang, Juan Geng, Anpeng Fu, Jing Wu, Aihua Yin
{"title":"Exome sequencing for nonimmune hydrops fetalis and clinical utility of data reanalysis.","authors":"Chang Liu, Yanlin Huang, Yunan Wang, Yan Zhang, Li Du, Lihua Yu, Hongke Ding, Fake Li, Yiming Qi, Yuan Liu, Xingwang Wang, Fangfang Guo, Ying Xiong, Xin Zhao, Liyuan Fang, Juan Geng, Anpeng Fu, Jing Wu, Aihua Yin","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) presents as life-threatening fluid collections in multiple fetal compartments and may be led by numerous etiologies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for single-gene disorders in unexplained NIHF and to evaluate the clinical utility of data reanalysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of 53 unexplained cases of NIHF were enrolled, including 39 cases met a strict definition of NIHF and 14 cases with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and/or cystic hygroma in combination with other fluid collections. Trio ES from fetal samples and parental blood was performed, and clinical reports were returned by geneticists and genetic counselors. Multidisciplinary team forums were conducted for accurate diagnoses and improved patient management. The clinical follow-up assessments were conducted, and the reanalysis was performed for cases with a non-positive result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic variants were identified in 22.6% (12/53) of the cases, and variants of potential clinical significance were detected in an additional 13.2% (7/53) of the cases. Of them, three possible diagnoses (3/41, 7.3%) were obtained during reanalysis. Notably, half of the diagnosed cases were from the group exhibiting only skin edema and increased NT and/or cystic hygroma. The diagnostic rate in this group was 42.8% (6/14), while in the classically defined NIHF group, the rate was 15.4% (6/39). The pregnancy termination and live birth rates of the cases with positive genetic testing results were found to be statistically significantly different from those with negative results (91.7% vs. 53.6% and 8.3% vs. 36.6%, P < 0.05 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ES provides high incremental diagnostic yield for NIHF after standard-of-care testing, and reevaluating non-diagnostic exomes in light of updated knowledge can maximize diagnostic yield. Identifying the etiology of NIHF facilitates prenatal diagnosis, improves the management of NIHF cases and predicts recurrence risk in future pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) presents as life-threatening fluid collections in multiple fetal compartments and may be led by numerous etiologies.
Aim: To establish the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for single-gene disorders in unexplained NIHF and to evaluate the clinical utility of data reanalysis.
Methods: A series of 53 unexplained cases of NIHF were enrolled, including 39 cases met a strict definition of NIHF and 14 cases with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and/or cystic hygroma in combination with other fluid collections. Trio ES from fetal samples and parental blood was performed, and clinical reports were returned by geneticists and genetic counselors. Multidisciplinary team forums were conducted for accurate diagnoses and improved patient management. The clinical follow-up assessments were conducted, and the reanalysis was performed for cases with a non-positive result.
Results: Diagnostic variants were identified in 22.6% (12/53) of the cases, and variants of potential clinical significance were detected in an additional 13.2% (7/53) of the cases. Of them, three possible diagnoses (3/41, 7.3%) were obtained during reanalysis. Notably, half of the diagnosed cases were from the group exhibiting only skin edema and increased NT and/or cystic hygroma. The diagnostic rate in this group was 42.8% (6/14), while in the classically defined NIHF group, the rate was 15.4% (6/39). The pregnancy termination and live birth rates of the cases with positive genetic testing results were found to be statistically significantly different from those with negative results (91.7% vs. 53.6% and 8.3% vs. 36.6%, P < 0.05 for both).
Conclusion: ES provides high incremental diagnostic yield for NIHF after standard-of-care testing, and reevaluating non-diagnostic exomes in light of updated knowledge can maximize diagnostic yield. Identifying the etiology of NIHF facilitates prenatal diagnosis, improves the management of NIHF cases and predicts recurrence risk in future pregnancies.
期刊介绍:
QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles.
Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence.
In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.