Waterpipe Size Matters: The Effect of Waterpipe Size on Toxicant Exposures and Subjective Experiences.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Danny Dabroy, Steven Alec Barrientos, Mohammed Ebrahimi Kalan, Ahmed Alarabi, Kevin Schug, Roman Goff, Sabrina Islam, Caroline O Cobb, Ziyad Ben Taleb
{"title":"Waterpipe Size Matters: The Effect of Waterpipe Size on Toxicant Exposures and Subjective Experiences.","authors":"Danny Dabroy, Steven Alec Barrientos, Mohammed Ebrahimi Kalan, Ahmed Alarabi, Kevin Schug, Roman Goff, Sabrina Islam, Caroline O Cobb, Ziyad Ben Taleb","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Waterpipe (WP) tobacco smoking remains popular among US young adults, yet specific regulations for WP devices are lacking. This study examines how WP device size (base volume and height) affects smoking behavior, toxicant exposures, and subjective experiences.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Thirty-eight individuals who smoke WP aged 21-39 participated in a randomized crossover study. Each completed three 45-min ad libitum smoking sessions using small, medium, and large WP sizes. Saliva nicotine and exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) were measured before and after smoking. Puff topography was recorded during sessions, and subjective smoking experiences were collected afterwards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in saliva nicotine between the three WP sizes, with higher concentrations for the small WP relative to larger sizes (p < .05). Exhaled CO was significantly higher after smoking the large WP compared to smaller sizes (p < .05). Puff topography revealed significant differences and followed a dose-response pattern, with larger size associated with longer puff duration, greater smoke volume inhaled, and larger puff volume (p < .05). The large WP was associated with enhanced subjective experiences for satisfaction and concentration compared to the small WP (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WP size substantially impacts smoking experiences and exposures. Regulation of WP size should be essential in comprehensive tobacco control policies aimed at curbing WP use among young adults. These findings will aid in the developing of WP size-specific standards to regulate the marketing and sales of WP devices. Such regulations should aim to minimize toxicant exposure by controlling the dimensions and design of WP components, which can significantly influence smoking behavior and toxicant intake.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study underscores the critical role of waterpipe (WP) size in shaping smoking behavior, experiences, and exposures among young adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"1227-1235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Waterpipe (WP) tobacco smoking remains popular among US young adults, yet specific regulations for WP devices are lacking. This study examines how WP device size (base volume and height) affects smoking behavior, toxicant exposures, and subjective experiences.

Aims and methods: Thirty-eight individuals who smoke WP aged 21-39 participated in a randomized crossover study. Each completed three 45-min ad libitum smoking sessions using small, medium, and large WP sizes. Saliva nicotine and exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) were measured before and after smoking. Puff topography was recorded during sessions, and subjective smoking experiences were collected afterwards.

Results: Significant differences were observed in saliva nicotine between the three WP sizes, with higher concentrations for the small WP relative to larger sizes (p < .05). Exhaled CO was significantly higher after smoking the large WP compared to smaller sizes (p < .05). Puff topography revealed significant differences and followed a dose-response pattern, with larger size associated with longer puff duration, greater smoke volume inhaled, and larger puff volume (p < .05). The large WP was associated with enhanced subjective experiences for satisfaction and concentration compared to the small WP (p < .05).

Conclusions: WP size substantially impacts smoking experiences and exposures. Regulation of WP size should be essential in comprehensive tobacco control policies aimed at curbing WP use among young adults. These findings will aid in the developing of WP size-specific standards to regulate the marketing and sales of WP devices. Such regulations should aim to minimize toxicant exposure by controlling the dimensions and design of WP components, which can significantly influence smoking behavior and toxicant intake.

Implications: This study underscores the critical role of waterpipe (WP) size in shaping smoking behavior, experiences, and exposures among young adults.

水烟大小很重要:水烟大小对毒物暴露和主观体验的影响。
导言:水烟(WP)在美国年轻人中仍然很流行,但对水烟装置却缺乏具体的规定。本研究探讨了水烟装置的尺寸(底座容积和高度)如何影响吸烟行为、毒物暴露和主观感受:方法:38 名年龄在 21 岁至 39 岁之间的可湿性粉剂吸食者参加了一项随机交叉研究。每个人分别使用小号、中号和大号可湿性粉剂完成了三次 45 分钟的自由吸烟。在吸烟前后测量唾液尼古丁和呼出的一氧化碳(eCO)。在吸烟过程中记录吸入气泡的形貌,并在吸烟后收集主观吸烟体验:结果:在三种尺寸的可吸入口中观察到唾液尼古丁有显著差异,小尺寸可吸入口中的尼古丁浓度高于大尺寸可吸入口中的尼古丁浓度(结论:可吸入口尺寸对吸烟体验和一氧化碳呼出量有很大影响:可湿性粉剂的大小对吸烟体验和暴露有很大影响。在旨在遏制年轻人使用可湿性粉剂的全面控烟政策中,对可湿性粉剂大小的监管应该是至关重要的。这些研究结果将有助于制定针对可吸入粉烟尺寸的标准,以规范可吸入粉烟设备的市场和销售。此类法规应旨在通过控制可湿性粉剂成分的尺寸和设计,最大限度地减少毒物暴露,因为这些成分会极大地影响吸烟行为和毒物摄入量:本研究强调了水烟(WP)尺寸在影响年轻人吸烟行为、吸烟经历和吸烟暴露方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信