Association between empty nose syndrome and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a preliminary cohort study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jerome R Lechien, Miguel Mayo-Yanez, Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba, Giannicola Iannella, Giovanni Cammaroto, Andrea De Vito, Alberto M Saibene, Luigi A Vaira, Antonino Maniaci
{"title":"Association between empty nose syndrome and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a preliminary cohort study.","authors":"Jerome R Lechien, Miguel Mayo-Yanez, Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba, Giannicola Iannella, Giovanni Cammaroto, Andrea De Vito, Alberto M Saibene, Luigi A Vaira, Antonino Maniaci","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09019-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and Empty Nose Syndrome (ENS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nasal and laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms were investigated in patients with ENS. Symptoms were evaluated with reflux symptom score-12 (RSS-12), nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE), empty nose syndrome 6-item questionnaire (ENS6Q), empty nose syndrome index (ENSI), and sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The anxiety and depression were assessed with the general anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), and patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). A study of association was conducted between demographics and patient-reported outcome questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one ENS patients were included (20 females (48.8%)). The control groups included 27 patients with rhinitis/rhinosinusitis and 36 asymptomatic individuals. The ENSI and ENS6Q detected ENS in 97.6% and 90.2% of cases, respectively. The mean scores of ENSI, ENS6Q, RSS-12, NOSE, and SNOT-22 were significantly higher in the ENS group compared to controls. The prevalence of suspected LPRD was 90.2% in the ENS group, which was significantly higher compared to controls. The prevalence of mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression in ENS patients was 7.3% (n = 3), 4.9% (n = 2), 39.0% (n = 16), and 46.3% (n = 19), respectively. RSS-12 reported significant and high associations with the ENS6Q (r<sub>s</sub>=0.939; p = .001) and ENSI (r<sub>s</sub>=0.699; p = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LPRD symptoms and prevalence were significantly higher in ENS patients compared to controls. Future controlled studies are needed to investigate the prevalence of LPRD in ENS patients through objective approaches (impedance-pH monitoring, nasal digestive enzyme measurements).</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"645-650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09019-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and Empty Nose Syndrome (ENS).

Methods: Nasal and laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms were investigated in patients with ENS. Symptoms were evaluated with reflux symptom score-12 (RSS-12), nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE), empty nose syndrome 6-item questionnaire (ENS6Q), empty nose syndrome index (ENSI), and sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The anxiety and depression were assessed with the general anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), and patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). A study of association was conducted between demographics and patient-reported outcome questionnaires.

Results: Forty-one ENS patients were included (20 females (48.8%)). The control groups included 27 patients with rhinitis/rhinosinusitis and 36 asymptomatic individuals. The ENSI and ENS6Q detected ENS in 97.6% and 90.2% of cases, respectively. The mean scores of ENSI, ENS6Q, RSS-12, NOSE, and SNOT-22 were significantly higher in the ENS group compared to controls. The prevalence of suspected LPRD was 90.2% in the ENS group, which was significantly higher compared to controls. The prevalence of mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression in ENS patients was 7.3% (n = 3), 4.9% (n = 2), 39.0% (n = 16), and 46.3% (n = 19), respectively. RSS-12 reported significant and high associations with the ENS6Q (rs=0.939; p = .001) and ENSI (rs=0.699; p = .001).

Conclusion: LPRD symptoms and prevalence were significantly higher in ENS patients compared to controls. Future controlled studies are needed to investigate the prevalence of LPRD in ENS patients through objective approaches (impedance-pH monitoring, nasal digestive enzyme measurements).

空鼻综合征与喉咽反流病之间的关系:一项初步队列研究。
目的:研究喉咽反流病(LPRD)与空鼻症(ENS)之间的关系:研究喉咽反流病(LPRD)与空鼻症(ENS)之间的关系:方法:对空鼻症患者的鼻腔和喉咽反流症状进行调查。用反流症状评分-12(RSS-12)、鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)、空鼻综合征 6 项问卷(ENS6Q)、空鼻综合征指数(ENSI)和鼻窦结果工具-22(SNOT-22)对症状进行评估。焦虑和抑郁情况则通过一般焦虑症-7(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)进行评估。对人口统计学和患者报告结果问卷之间的关联进行了研究:共纳入 41 名 ENS 患者(20 名女性,占 48.8%)。对照组包括 27 名鼻炎/鼻窦炎患者和 36 名无症状者。ENSI和ENS6Q分别在97.6%和90.2%的病例中检测出ENS。与对照组相比,ENS组患者的ENSI、ENS6Q、RSS-12、NOSE和SNOT-22平均得分明显更高。ENS组疑似LPRD的患病率为90.2%,明显高于对照组。ENS患者的轻度、中度、中重度和重度抑郁症患病率分别为7.3%(3人)、4.9%(2人)、39.0%(16人)和46.3%(19人)。RSS-12与ENS6Q(rs=0.939;p=.001)和ENSI(rs=0.699;p=.001)有明显的高度关联:结论:与对照组相比,ENS 患者的 LPRD 症状和患病率明显更高。今后需要进行对照研究,通过客观方法(阻抗-pH 监测、鼻腔消化酶测量)调查耳鼻咽喉病患者 LPRD 的患病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书