Best practices for differential accessibility analysis in single-cell epigenomics

IF 14.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Alan Yue Yang Teo, Jordan W. Squair, Gregoire Courtine, Michael A. Skinnider
{"title":"Best practices for differential accessibility analysis in single-cell epigenomics","authors":"Alan Yue Yang Teo, Jordan W. Squair, Gregoire Courtine, Michael A. Skinnider","doi":"10.1038/s41467-024-53089-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Differential accessibility (DA) analysis of single-cell epigenomics data enables the discovery of regulatory programs that establish cell type identity and steer responses to physiological and pathophysiological perturbations. While many statistical methods to identify DA regions have been developed, the principles that determine the performance of these methods remain unclear. As a result, there is no consensus on the most appropriate statistical methods for DA analysis of single-cell epigenomics data. Here, we present a systematic evaluation of statistical methods that have been applied to identify DA regions in single-cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) data. We leverage a compendium of scATAC-seq experiments with matching bulk ATAC-seq or scRNA-seq in order to assess the accuracy, bias, robustness, and scalability of each statistical method. The structure of our experiments also provides the opportunity to define best practices for the analysis of scATAC-seq data beyond DA itself. We leverage this understanding to develop an R package implementing these best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53089-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differential accessibility (DA) analysis of single-cell epigenomics data enables the discovery of regulatory programs that establish cell type identity and steer responses to physiological and pathophysiological perturbations. While many statistical methods to identify DA regions have been developed, the principles that determine the performance of these methods remain unclear. As a result, there is no consensus on the most appropriate statistical methods for DA analysis of single-cell epigenomics data. Here, we present a systematic evaluation of statistical methods that have been applied to identify DA regions in single-cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) data. We leverage a compendium of scATAC-seq experiments with matching bulk ATAC-seq or scRNA-seq in order to assess the accuracy, bias, robustness, and scalability of each statistical method. The structure of our experiments also provides the opportunity to define best practices for the analysis of scATAC-seq data beyond DA itself. We leverage this understanding to develop an R package implementing these best practices.

Abstract Image

单细胞表观组学中差异可及性分析的最佳实践
通过对单细胞表观基因组学数据进行差异可及性(DA)分析,可以发现建立细胞类型特征并引导对生理和病理生理扰动做出反应的调控程序。虽然已经开发出了许多识别DA区域的统计方法,但决定这些方法性能的原理仍不明确。因此,对于单细胞表观基因组学数据 DA 分析的最合适统计方法还没有达成共识。在此,我们对已用于识别单细胞 ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq)数据中的 DA 区域的统计方法进行了系统评估。我们利用与大量 ATAC-seq 或 scRNA-seq 相匹配的 scATAC-seq 实验汇编来评估每种统计方法的准确性、偏差、稳健性和可扩展性。我们的实验结构还提供了一个机会,可借以定义 DA 本身之外的 scATAC-seq 数据分析最佳实践。我们利用这一认识开发了一个实现这些最佳实践的 R 软件包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信