Assessing ChatGPT’s Information Quality Through the Lens of User Information Satisfaction and Information Quality Theory in Higher Education: A Theoretical Framework

IF 4.3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chung-Jen Fu, Andri Dayarana K. Silalahi, I-Tung Shih, Do Thi Thanh Phuong, Ixora Javanisa Eunike, Shinetsetseg Jargalsaikhan
{"title":"Assessing ChatGPT’s Information Quality Through the Lens of User Information Satisfaction and Information Quality Theory in Higher Education: A Theoretical Framework","authors":"Chung-Jen Fu,&nbsp;Andri Dayarana K. Silalahi,&nbsp;I-Tung Shih,&nbsp;Do Thi Thanh Phuong,&nbsp;Ixora Javanisa Eunike,&nbsp;Shinetsetseg Jargalsaikhan","doi":"10.1155/2024/8114315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Incorporating AI tools like ChatGPT into higher education has been beneficial, yet the extent of user satisfaction with the quality of information provided by these tools, known as user information satisfaction (UIS) and information quality (IQ) theory, remains underexplored. This study introduces a UIS model specifically designed for ChatGPT’s application in the educational sector based on multidimensions of IQ theory. Drawing from established UIS and IQ theory, we crafted a model centered around seven essential factors that influence the effective use of ChatGPT, aiming to guide educators and learners in overcoming common challenges such as plagiarism and ensuring the ethical use of AI. Data was collected from Indonesian university participants (<i>N</i> = 508) and analyzed using structural equation modeling with Smart-PLS 4.0. The results reveal that completeness, precision, timeliness, convenience, and information format are the most influential factors driving user satisfaction with ChatGPT. Interestingly, our research indicated that the accuracy and reliability of the information, typically deemed paramount, were not the primary concerns in the academic use of ChatGPT. Our findings recommend a cautious approach to integrating ChatGPT in higher education. We advocate for strategic use that recognizes its innovative potential while acknowledging its limitations, ensuring responsible and effective application in educational contexts. This balanced perspective is crucial for integrating AI tools into the academic fabric without compromising educational integrity or quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8114315","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8114315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating AI tools like ChatGPT into higher education has been beneficial, yet the extent of user satisfaction with the quality of information provided by these tools, known as user information satisfaction (UIS) and information quality (IQ) theory, remains underexplored. This study introduces a UIS model specifically designed for ChatGPT’s application in the educational sector based on multidimensions of IQ theory. Drawing from established UIS and IQ theory, we crafted a model centered around seven essential factors that influence the effective use of ChatGPT, aiming to guide educators and learners in overcoming common challenges such as plagiarism and ensuring the ethical use of AI. Data was collected from Indonesian university participants (N = 508) and analyzed using structural equation modeling with Smart-PLS 4.0. The results reveal that completeness, precision, timeliness, convenience, and information format are the most influential factors driving user satisfaction with ChatGPT. Interestingly, our research indicated that the accuracy and reliability of the information, typically deemed paramount, were not the primary concerns in the academic use of ChatGPT. Our findings recommend a cautious approach to integrating ChatGPT in higher education. We advocate for strategic use that recognizes its innovative potential while acknowledging its limitations, ensuring responsible and effective application in educational contexts. This balanced perspective is crucial for integrating AI tools into the academic fabric without compromising educational integrity or quality.

Abstract Image

从高等教育用户信息满意度和信息质量理论的角度评估 ChatGPT 的信息质量:理论框架
将人工智能工具(如 ChatGPT)纳入高等教育一直是有益的,但用户对这些工具所提供信息质量的满意程度(即用户信息满意度(UIS)和信息质量(IQ)理论)仍未得到充分探讨。本研究基于 IQ 理论的多个维度,介绍了专门为 ChatGPT 在教育领域的应用而设计的 UIS 模型。借鉴已有的 UIS 和 IQ 理论,我们围绕影响 ChatGPT 有效使用的七个基本因素设计了一个模型,旨在指导教育者和学习者克服常见的挑战,如抄袭和确保人工智能的道德使用。数据收集自印度尼西亚的大学参与者(N = 508),并使用 Smart-PLS 4.0 进行结构方程建模分析。结果显示,完整性、准确性、及时性、便利性和信息格式是用户对 ChatGPT 满意度的最大影响因素。有趣的是,我们的研究表明,信息的准确性和可靠性(通常被认为是最重要的)并不是学术界使用 ChatGPT 的首要考虑因素。我们的发现建议在高等教育中整合 ChatGPT 时采取谨慎的方法。我们主张战略性地使用 ChatGPT,在承认其创新潜力的同时承认其局限性,确保在教育环境中负责任地、有效地应用 ChatGPT。这种平衡的观点对于将人工智能工具整合到学术结构中,同时又不损害教育的完整性或质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信