Soil Carbon Accumulation Under Afforestation Is Driven by Contrasting Responses of Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Carbon

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Deping Zhai, Yiyue Wang, Chang Liao, Xiuxian Men, Chi Wang, Xiaoli Cheng
{"title":"Soil Carbon Accumulation Under Afforestation Is Driven by Contrasting Responses of Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Carbon","authors":"Deping Zhai,&nbsp;Yiyue Wang,&nbsp;Chang Liao,&nbsp;Xiuxian Men,&nbsp;Chi Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoli Cheng","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Afforestation is widely believed to sequester carbon (C) in soil. However, the effect of afforestation on soil organic C (SOC) accumulation is still debated due to the contrasting features of particulate and mineral-associated organic C (POC and MAOC). We conducted a field investigation of 144 paired sampling sites by comparing afforested and non-afforested lands to investigate the POC and MAOC dynamics after afforestation across the Danjiangkou basin in subtropical China, where forests are dominated by <i>Platycladus orientalis</i>, <i>Quercus variabilis</i> and <i>Pinus massoniana</i>. The average contents of SOC, POC, and MAOC were significantly increased by afforestation; however, POC and MAOC responded differently to afforestation type. All afforestation types promoted the POC content, and MAOC also showed positive responses to afforestation except that afforestation with <i>P</i>. <i>massoniana</i> from shrubland significantly reduced the MAOC content. With increasing SOC content, the POC grew at a faster rate than MAOC at high SOC levels. Afforestation hindered the growth rate of POC, while it promoted the growth rate of MAOC as SOC accrued, which potentially obscured the distinct patterns of C accumulation triggered by afforestation. The variation partitioning suggests that, under afforestation, microbial traits had a higher contribution to both POC and MAOM variations compared with non-afforested land. These results suggest that the robust buildup of microbial biomass due to increased plant C input following afforestation could contribute to soil C accumulation by promoting microbial necromass.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Afforestation is widely believed to sequester carbon (C) in soil. However, the effect of afforestation on soil organic C (SOC) accumulation is still debated due to the contrasting features of particulate and mineral-associated organic C (POC and MAOC). We conducted a field investigation of 144 paired sampling sites by comparing afforested and non-afforested lands to investigate the POC and MAOC dynamics after afforestation across the Danjiangkou basin in subtropical China, where forests are dominated by Platycladus orientalis, Quercus variabilis and Pinus massoniana. The average contents of SOC, POC, and MAOC were significantly increased by afforestation; however, POC and MAOC responded differently to afforestation type. All afforestation types promoted the POC content, and MAOC also showed positive responses to afforestation except that afforestation with P. massoniana from shrubland significantly reduced the MAOC content. With increasing SOC content, the POC grew at a faster rate than MAOC at high SOC levels. Afforestation hindered the growth rate of POC, while it promoted the growth rate of MAOC as SOC accrued, which potentially obscured the distinct patterns of C accumulation triggered by afforestation. The variation partitioning suggests that, under afforestation, microbial traits had a higher contribution to both POC and MAOM variations compared with non-afforested land. These results suggest that the robust buildup of microbial biomass due to increased plant C input following afforestation could contribute to soil C accumulation by promoting microbial necromass.

植树造林下的土壤碳积累是由颗粒有机碳和矿物相关有机碳的不同反应驱动的
人们普遍认为植树造林可以固碳。然而,植树造林对土壤有机碳(SOC)积累的影响仍存在争议,因为颗粒有机碳和矿物相关有机碳(POC 和 MAOC)具有截然不同的特征。我们在中国亚热带丹江口盆地的 144 个配对采样点进行了实地调查,对比了造林地和非造林地,研究了造林后 POC 和 MAOC 的动态变化。造林显著提高了SOC、POC和MAOC的平均含量,但POC和MAOC对造林类型的响应不同。所有造林类型都提高了 POC 含量,MAOC 也对造林表现出积极的反应,只有从灌木林造林到马尾松造林明显降低了 MAOC 含量。随着 SOC 含量的增加,在高 SOC 水平下,POC 的生长速度快于 MAOC。植树造林阻碍了 POC 的增长速度,而随着 SOC 的增加,则促进了 MAOC 的增长速度,这可能掩盖了植树造林引发的不同的 C 累积模式。变化分区表明,与非植树造林地相比,植树造林下微生物特征对 POC 和 MAOM 变化的贡献更大。这些结果表明,植树造林后植物碳输入的增加会导致微生物生物量的强劲增长,这可能会通过促进微生物坏死来促进土壤碳积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信