Reference values of strain-derived myocardial work indices in heart transplant patients.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyae091
G E Mandoli, F Landra, L Tanzi, L Martini, C Fusi, C Sciaccaluga, E E Diviggiano, M Barilli, M C Pastore, M Focardi, S Bernazzali, M Maccherini, M Cameli, M Y Henein
{"title":"Reference values of strain-derived myocardial work indices in heart transplant patients.","authors":"G E Mandoli, F Landra, L Tanzi, L Martini, C Fusi, C Sciaccaluga, E E Diviggiano, M Barilli, M C Pastore, M Focardi, S Bernazzali, M Maccherini, M Cameli, M Y Henein","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Myocardial work (MW) is a relatively novel non-invasive echocardiographic method with increasing fields of application. Normal reference ranges of MW indices in patients who have undergone a heart transplant (HTx) have not been determined yet. The aim of this study was to obtain the reference ranges for 2D echocardiographic indices of MW for adult HTx patients and to compare them with the results of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Normal Reference Ranges for Echocardiography (NORRE) study.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>All consecutive HTx patients admitted at our institution (University Hospital of Siena, Italy) between September 2019 and May 2022 who underwent endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) were considered. Patients with a history of rejection, a history of coronary artery vasculopathy, either acute cellular rejection or acute antibody-mediated rejection at EMB, and donor-specific antibodies were excluded. MW retrospectively performed for the included patients was retrieved, and the results were compared with those from the EACVI NORRE study. Out of 176 HTx patients who underwent EMB, 94 patients were excluded. The study population consisted of 82 HTx patients [68.3% male, median age 53 (46-62) years]. The median duration from HTx was 5 (2-22) months. The main MW indices such as global work efficiency (GWE, 84 ± 8%), global work index (GWI, 1447 ± 409 mmHg%), global constructive work (GCW, 2067 ± 423 mmHg%), and global wasted work [GWW, 310 (217-499) mmHg%] did not differ according to gender. Each of these indices significantly differed from those reported in the EACVI NORRE study (<i>P</i>-value <0.001), with lower GWI, GCW, and GWE and higher GWW values in the HTx population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides reference ranges for MW indices in an adult HTx population free from transplant-related complications which proved to be different from those previously reported in healthy volunteers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Myocardial work (MW) is a relatively novel non-invasive echocardiographic method with increasing fields of application. Normal reference ranges of MW indices in patients who have undergone a heart transplant (HTx) have not been determined yet. The aim of this study was to obtain the reference ranges for 2D echocardiographic indices of MW for adult HTx patients and to compare them with the results of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Normal Reference Ranges for Echocardiography (NORRE) study.

Methods and results: All consecutive HTx patients admitted at our institution (University Hospital of Siena, Italy) between September 2019 and May 2022 who underwent endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) were considered. Patients with a history of rejection, a history of coronary artery vasculopathy, either acute cellular rejection or acute antibody-mediated rejection at EMB, and donor-specific antibodies were excluded. MW retrospectively performed for the included patients was retrieved, and the results were compared with those from the EACVI NORRE study. Out of 176 HTx patients who underwent EMB, 94 patients were excluded. The study population consisted of 82 HTx patients [68.3% male, median age 53 (46-62) years]. The median duration from HTx was 5 (2-22) months. The main MW indices such as global work efficiency (GWE, 84 ± 8%), global work index (GWI, 1447 ± 409 mmHg%), global constructive work (GCW, 2067 ± 423 mmHg%), and global wasted work [GWW, 310 (217-499) mmHg%] did not differ according to gender. Each of these indices significantly differed from those reported in the EACVI NORRE study (P-value <0.001), with lower GWI, GCW, and GWE and higher GWW values in the HTx population.

Conclusion: This study provides reference ranges for MW indices in an adult HTx population free from transplant-related complications which proved to be different from those previously reported in healthy volunteers.

心脏移植患者的应变心肌工作指数参考值。
目的:心肌功(MW)是一种相对新颖的无创超声心动图方法,其应用领域越来越广。目前尚未确定心脏移植(HTx)患者心肌功指数的正常参考范围。本研究的目的是获得成年心脏移植患者二维超声心动图MW指数的参考范围,并将其与欧洲心血管成像协会(EACVI)超声心动图正常参考范围(NORRE)研究的结果进行比较:研究对象为我院(意大利锡耶纳大学医院)在2019年9月至2022年5月期间收治的所有连续接受心内膜活检(EMB)的HTx患者。排除了有排斥反应史、冠状动脉血管病变史、EMB急性细胞排斥反应或急性抗体介导排斥反应以及供体特异性抗体的患者。对纳入患者的MW进行了回顾性检索,并将结果与EACVI NORRE研究的结果进行了比较。在 176 例接受 EMB 的 HTx 患者中,有 94 例患者被排除在外。研究对象包括 82 名 HTx 患者[68.3% 为男性,中位年龄为 53(46-62)岁]。HTx 中位持续时间为 5(2-22)个月。全局工作效率(GWE,84 ± 8%)、全局工作指数(GWI,1447 ± 409 mmHg%)、全局建设性工作(GCW,2067 ± 423 mmHg%)和全局浪费工作[GWW,310 (217-499) mmHg%]等主要工作指数没有性别差异。这些指数均与 EACVI NORRE 研究中报告的指数存在明显差异(P 值 结论):这项研究为没有移植相关并发症的成人 HTx 患者提供了 MW 指数的参考范围,事实证明这些指数与之前在健康志愿者中报告的指数不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信