Technology-based instrumental activities of daily living in persons with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.

IF 4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jared F Benge, Arsh Ali, Neha Chandna, Noor Rana, Rachel Mis, David A González, Andrew M Kiselica, Michael K Scullin, Robin C Hilsabeck
{"title":"Technology-based instrumental activities of daily living in persons with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.","authors":"Jared F Benge, Arsh Ali, Neha Chandna, Noor Rana, Rachel Mis, David A González, Andrew M Kiselica, Michael K Scullin, Robin C Hilsabeck","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) increasingly involve technology (e.g., making payments online, texting). The current study examined the applicability and diagnostic accuracy of technology-based iADLs in those evaluated for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 264 care partners of persons undergoing comprehensive interdisciplinary evaluations completed the Functional Activities Questionnaire and 11 technology-based iADL items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technology-based iADLs applied to more than 80% of patients. Average dependence on technology-based items was overall less than for traditional iADLs. The addition of technology-based items to traditional iADL items slightly improved the ability to identify individuals with dementia. When considered separately, technology-based iADL items demonstrated comparable ability to distinguish between diagnostic stages.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Technology use is common in older adults with ADRD for a range of daily activities. Accounting for technology use increases the content validity of existing iADL measures for the modern context and yields comparable diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Technology use is often integral to daily activity performance for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).Daily technologies, such as smartphones, were used frequently by those with ADRD.Many individuals were less dependent on technology activities than traditional activities.Adding technology questions slightly increased diagnostic accuracy for detecting dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"16 4","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) increasingly involve technology (e.g., making payments online, texting). The current study examined the applicability and diagnostic accuracy of technology-based iADLs in those evaluated for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

Methods: A total of 264 care partners of persons undergoing comprehensive interdisciplinary evaluations completed the Functional Activities Questionnaire and 11 technology-based iADL items.

Results: Technology-based iADLs applied to more than 80% of patients. Average dependence on technology-based items was overall less than for traditional iADLs. The addition of technology-based items to traditional iADL items slightly improved the ability to identify individuals with dementia. When considered separately, technology-based iADL items demonstrated comparable ability to distinguish between diagnostic stages.

Discussion: Technology use is common in older adults with ADRD for a range of daily activities. Accounting for technology use increases the content validity of existing iADL measures for the modern context and yields comparable diagnostic accuracy.

Highlights: Technology use is often integral to daily activity performance for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).Daily technologies, such as smartphones, were used frequently by those with ADRD.Many individuals were less dependent on technology activities than traditional activities.Adding technology questions slightly increased diagnostic accuracy for detecting dementia.

为阿尔茨海默氏症及相关疾病患者提供以技术为基础的日常生活工具。
简介工具性日常生活活动(iADLs)越来越多地涉及到技术(如在线支付、发短信)。本研究考察了基于技术的 iADLs 在阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)患者评估中的适用性和诊断准确性:共有 264 名接受跨学科综合评估者的护理伙伴完成了功能活动问卷和 11 个基于技术的 iADL 项目:结果:80%以上的患者适用基于技术的 iADL。对基于技术的项目的平均依赖程度总体上低于传统的 iADLs。在传统的 iADL 项目中加入科技型项目后,识别痴呆症患者的能力略有提高。如果单独考虑,基于技术的 iADL 项目在区分诊断阶段方面的能力相当:讨论:患有 ADRD 的老年人在一系列日常活动中普遍使用技术。讨论:在患有 ADRD 的老年人中,在一系列日常活动中使用技术是很常见的,考虑到技术的使用会提高现有 iADL 测量方法在现代环境下的内容有效性,并产生可比的诊断准确性:许多人对技术活动的依赖程度低于传统活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信