Intensive care unit diaries-harmful or harmless: A systematic literature review and qualitative data synthesis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Matthias Thomas Exl, Lea Lotzer, Teresa Deffner, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Peter Nydahl
{"title":"Intensive care unit diaries-harmful or harmless: A systematic literature review and qualitative data synthesis.","authors":"Matthias Thomas Exl, Lea Lotzer, Teresa Deffner, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Peter Nydahl","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this research was to evaluate the extent of harm for critically ill patients, family members, and healthcare professionals associated with writing and reading intensive care unit (ICU) diaries.</p><p><strong>Review method used: </strong>A systematic literature review and a synthesis of qualitative data were performed. The protocol of this study has been registered in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022376393).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Databases were PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsychNet, and Livivo.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>The search included qualitative and mixed-methods studies related to harm with an ICU diary. Deductive content analysis was used to create abstractions of quotations. Study quality was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 12 827 titles, 27 studies with 476 participants were included. Events involving the patients, family members, and healthcare professionals occurred but did not result in harm. A total of 68 quotations from patients, family members, and healthcare professionals were extracted. Those patients, their families, and healthcare professionals who mentioned intense emotions regarding diaries experienced writing and reading diaries as an emotional journey (patients), a help with tears (families), or a question of emotional distance (healthcare professionals).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Writing and reading ICU diaries can be associated with intense emotions, which are natural reactions when coping with a stressful situation. No study reported harm. Based on uncertain qualitative evidence, the benefits of writing and reading ICU diaries as coping strategies outweigh the potential harm. More research is needed.</p><p><strong>Registration of review: </strong>The International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42022376393.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the extent of harm for critically ill patients, family members, and healthcare professionals associated with writing and reading intensive care unit (ICU) diaries.

Review method used: A systematic literature review and a synthesis of qualitative data were performed. The protocol of this study has been registered in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022376393).

Data sources: Databases were PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsychNet, and Livivo.

Review methods: The search included qualitative and mixed-methods studies related to harm with an ICU diary. Deductive content analysis was used to create abstractions of quotations. Study quality was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.

Results: Of 12 827 titles, 27 studies with 476 participants were included. Events involving the patients, family members, and healthcare professionals occurred but did not result in harm. A total of 68 quotations from patients, family members, and healthcare professionals were extracted. Those patients, their families, and healthcare professionals who mentioned intense emotions regarding diaries experienced writing and reading diaries as an emotional journey (patients), a help with tears (families), or a question of emotional distance (healthcare professionals).

Conclusions: Writing and reading ICU diaries can be associated with intense emotions, which are natural reactions when coping with a stressful situation. No study reported harm. Based on uncertain qualitative evidence, the benefits of writing and reading ICU diaries as coping strategies outweigh the potential harm. More research is needed.

Registration of review: The International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42022376393.

重症监护室日记--有害还是无害?系统文献回顾与定性数据综合。
研究目的本研究旨在评估撰写和阅读重症监护病房(ICU)日记对重症患者、家属和医护人员的伤害程度:采用的综述方法:进行了系统的文献综述和定性数据综合。本研究的方案已在国际前瞻性系统综述注册中心(CRD42022376393)注册:数据库包括 PubMed、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、PsychNet 和 Livivo:综述方法:检索包括与重症监护病房日记危害相关的定性和混合方法研究。采用演绎式内容分析法对引文进行摘录。研究质量采用批判性评价技能计划进行评估:在 12 827 个标题中,共纳入了 27 项研究,参与人数为 476 人。涉及患者、家属和医护人员的事件时有发生,但并未造成伤害。共摘录了 68 条来自患者、家属和医护人员的语录。那些提到对日记有强烈情感的患者、家属和医护人员将撰写和阅读日记视为一次情感之旅(患者)、一次流泪的帮助(家属)或一个情感距离的问题(医护人员):结论:撰写和阅读重症监护病房日记可能会产生强烈的情绪,这是应对压力时的自然反应。没有研究报告称其有害。根据不确定的定性证据,将撰写和阅读 ICU 日记作为应对策略的益处大于潜在的危害。需要进行更多的研究:国际前瞻性系统综述注册号:CRD42022376393。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信