"Death Is Not a Dirty Word:" A Qualitative Study of Emergency Clinician End-of-Life Communication.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Hannah Kotler, Pamela S Hinds, Amy Hope Jones Wolfe
{"title":"\"Death Is Not a Dirty Word:\" A Qualitative Study of Emergency Clinician End-of-Life Communication.","authors":"Hannah Kotler, Pamela S Hinds, Amy Hope Jones Wolfe","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-067876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric patients with life-limiting diagnoses frequently seek care in the pediatric emergency department (PED) during times of acute illness, or at end-of-life (EOL) . Although the population of patients with life-limiting diagnoses is heterogenous, clinician expertise in EOL communication is essential to providing family-centered care. In this study, we explored PED physician and nurse experiences with communication when eliciting EOL values, including factors specified to the PED environment, clinician perceptions of family supports and preferences, and clinicians' self-reflection of their skills and challenges in this sphere.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective qualitative study using semistructured interviews of PED physicians and nurses recruited from a quaternary care center. Thematic content analysis was performed on the transcribed interviews to identify codes and, ultimately, themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 17 emergency department clinicians, including 10 physicians and 7 nurses. Thematic content analysis revealed 6 salient themes. The first theme related to contextual factors of the emergency department environment. Two additional themes related to patient and family characteristics, including unique patient and family factors and clinician interpretation of parental/family needs. Lastly, we found 3 clinician-focused themes including knowledge gaps in EOL communication, communication styles and priorities in EOL conversations with families, and coping with ethical challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PED clinicians report communication-related challenges to providing optimal care for families and patients with life-limiting diagnoses. Participants self-identified gaps in communication skills in this area. Future studies should focus on clinician educational interventions on the basis of this needs assessment and include family perspectives to develop best practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pediatric patients with life-limiting diagnoses frequently seek care in the pediatric emergency department (PED) during times of acute illness, or at end-of-life (EOL) . Although the population of patients with life-limiting diagnoses is heterogenous, clinician expertise in EOL communication is essential to providing family-centered care. In this study, we explored PED physician and nurse experiences with communication when eliciting EOL values, including factors specified to the PED environment, clinician perceptions of family supports and preferences, and clinicians' self-reflection of their skills and challenges in this sphere.

Methods: We performed a prospective qualitative study using semistructured interviews of PED physicians and nurses recruited from a quaternary care center. Thematic content analysis was performed on the transcribed interviews to identify codes and, ultimately, themes.

Results: We interviewed 17 emergency department clinicians, including 10 physicians and 7 nurses. Thematic content analysis revealed 6 salient themes. The first theme related to contextual factors of the emergency department environment. Two additional themes related to patient and family characteristics, including unique patient and family factors and clinician interpretation of parental/family needs. Lastly, we found 3 clinician-focused themes including knowledge gaps in EOL communication, communication styles and priorities in EOL conversations with families, and coping with ethical challenges.

Conclusions: PED clinicians report communication-related challenges to providing optimal care for families and patients with life-limiting diagnoses. Participants self-identified gaps in communication skills in this area. Future studies should focus on clinician educational interventions on the basis of this needs assessment and include family perspectives to develop best practice.

"死亡不是一个肮脏的字眼:"急诊医生临终沟通的定性研究。
目的:被诊断为生命垂危的儿科患者在急性期或临终前经常到儿科急诊室(PED)就诊。尽管被诊断为生命垂危的患者群体各不相同,但临床医生在临终沟通方面的专业知识对于提供以家庭为中心的护理至关重要。在本研究中,我们探讨了 PED 医生和护士在征询临终价值观时的沟通经验,包括 PED 环境的特定因素、临床医生对家庭支持和偏好的看法,以及临床医生对其在这一领域的技能和挑战的自我反思:我们对一家四级医疗中心的 PED 医生和护士进行了半结构式访谈,开展了一项前瞻性定性研究。我们对转录的访谈内容进行了主题内容分析,以确定代码并最终确定主题:我们对 17 名急诊科临床医生进行了访谈,其中包括 10 名医生和 7 名护士。主题内容分析揭示了 6 个突出主题。第一个主题与急诊科环境的背景因素有关。另外两个主题与患者和家庭特征有关,包括独特的患者和家庭因素以及临床医生对父母/家庭需求的解释。最后,我们发现了 3 个以临床医生为中心的主题,包括临终沟通方面的知识差距、与家属进行临终对话时的沟通方式和优先事项以及应对伦理挑战:PED 临床医生报告了在为临终诊断患者的家属和患者提供最佳护理时遇到的与沟通相关的挑战。参与者自认在这方面的沟通技巧存在差距。未来的研究应在需求评估的基础上,重点关注临床医生的教育干预措施,并纳入家属的观点,以制定最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信