Hassaam S Choudhry, Riya H Patel, Lana Salloum, Jack McCloskey, Jeffrey M Goshe
{"title":"Association Between Neighborhood Deprivation and Number of Ophthalmology Providers.","authors":"Hassaam S Choudhry, Riya H Patel, Lana Salloum, Jack McCloskey, Jeffrey M Goshe","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2406503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a quantitative measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage used to identify high-risk communities. The distribution of physicians with respect to ADI can indicate decreased healthcare access in deprived neighborhoods. This study applies ADI to the distribution of ophthalmologists and demonstrates how practice patterns in the national Medicare Part D program may vary with ADI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Data \"Medicare Part D Prescribers by Provider\" data for 2021 was analyzed. Geocodio identified ADIs corresponding to the practice addresses listed in the dataset. The national rank ADIs were compared against the number of ophthalmologists. Spearman's correlation test and one-way ANOVA determined statistically significant differences in Medicare data extracted between quintiles of ADI ranks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 14,668 ophthalmologists who provided care to Medicare beneficiaries. Each time ADI increased by 10, there was an average 9.4% decrease in ophthalmologists (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The distribution of ophthalmologists practicing throughout the United States by increasing ADI quintile are: 32%, 23%, 19%, 16%, and 9%. Providers practicing in neighborhoods in the first-ADI quintile were more likely to see Medicare beneficiaries compared to providers in the fifth-ADI quintile (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of ophthalmologists in high-ADI areas results in reduced eye care access in deprived neighborhoods. Many factors contribute to these disparities including limited access to metropolitan areas/academic institutions and fewer residency programs. Future programs and policies should focus efforts on creating an even distribution of ophthalmologists across the United States and improving access to eye care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2406503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a quantitative measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage used to identify high-risk communities. The distribution of physicians with respect to ADI can indicate decreased healthcare access in deprived neighborhoods. This study applies ADI to the distribution of ophthalmologists and demonstrates how practice patterns in the national Medicare Part D program may vary with ADI.
Methods: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Data "Medicare Part D Prescribers by Provider" data for 2021 was analyzed. Geocodio identified ADIs corresponding to the practice addresses listed in the dataset. The national rank ADIs were compared against the number of ophthalmologists. Spearman's correlation test and one-way ANOVA determined statistically significant differences in Medicare data extracted between quintiles of ADI ranks.
Results: We identified 14,668 ophthalmologists who provided care to Medicare beneficiaries. Each time ADI increased by 10, there was an average 9.4% decrease in ophthalmologists (p < 0.001). The distribution of ophthalmologists practicing throughout the United States by increasing ADI quintile are: 32%, 23%, 19%, 16%, and 9%. Providers practicing in neighborhoods in the first-ADI quintile were more likely to see Medicare beneficiaries compared to providers in the fifth-ADI quintile (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The lack of ophthalmologists in high-ADI areas results in reduced eye care access in deprived neighborhoods. Many factors contribute to these disparities including limited access to metropolitan areas/academic institutions and fewer residency programs. Future programs and policies should focus efforts on creating an even distribution of ophthalmologists across the United States and improving access to eye care.
目的:地区贫困指数(ADI)是对社区社会经济劣势的量化测量,用于识别高风险社区。医生在 ADI 方面的分布情况可表明贫困社区医疗服务的可及性有所下降。本研究将 ADI 应用于眼科医生的分布情况,并展示了全国医疗保险 D 部分计划中的执业模式如何随着 ADI 的变化而变化:方法:分析了美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 2021 年的 "医疗保险 D 部分处方者(按提供者分列)"数据。Geocodio 确定了与数据集中所列执业地址相对应的 ADI。将全国排名的 ADI 与眼科医生数量进行比较。斯皮尔曼相关性检验和单向方差分析确定了 ADI 排名五分位数之间提取的医疗保险数据在统计学上的显著差异:我们确定了 14,668 名为医疗保险受益人提供医疗服务的眼科医生。ADI 每增加 10,眼科医生人数平均减少 9.4%(p p 结论:ADI 每增加 10,眼科医生人数平均减少 9.4%:ADI 高的地区缺乏眼科医生,导致贫困地区的眼科医疗服务减少。造成这些差异的因素很多,包括进入大都市/学术机构的机会有限以及住院医师培训项目较少。未来的计划和政策应致力于在全美范围内实现眼科医生的均衡分布,并改善眼科医疗服务的可及性。
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.