The role of the lower uterine segment thickness in predicting preterm birth in twin pregnancies presenting with threatened preterm labor.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-14 Print Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0337
Ezgi Başaran, Atakan Tanaçan, Nihat Farisoğullari, Zahid Ağaoğlu, Osman Onur Özkavak, Özgür Kara, Dilek Şahin
{"title":"The role of the lower uterine segment thickness in predicting preterm birth in twin pregnancies presenting with threatened preterm labor.","authors":"Ezgi Başaran, Atakan Tanaçan, Nihat Farisoğullari, Zahid Ağaoğlu, Osman Onur Özkavak, Özgür Kara, Dilek Şahin","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the relationship between the lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness and the onset of labor in dichorionic twin pregnancies experiencing threatened preterm labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included dichorionic twin pregnancies between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation, presenting with symptoms of preterm labor. The LUS thickness and mid-anterior wall thickness were measured via transabdominal ultrasonography, cervical length, and posterior cervical lip thickness were measured transvaginally. The presence of the cervical sliding sign and funneling findings were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients with an onset of labor before the 34th week, the mean LUS thickness was 3.8 ± 0.9 mm, compared to 4.6 ± 1.1 mm in those with an onset of labor at or after 34<sup>0/7</sup> GW, indicating a statistically significant difference (p=0.012). Similarly, accepting the GW threshold as 35<sup>0/7</sup> weeks, a statistically significant difference was found in the mean LUS thickness, which was 4.0 ± 1.0 mm in those with an earlier onset of labor and 4.7 ± 1.0 mm in those with a later onset of labor (p=0.022). While univariate analysis indicated that the LUS thickness was a significant predictor (p=0.017 for <34 GW and p=0.028 for <35 GW), multivariate analysis showed a reduced effect (p=0.04 and p=0.06, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS was significantly thinner in pregnancies with an onset of labor before the 34th and 35th GW. The measurement of the LUS thickness can be considered an alternative method for predicting spontaneous preterm birth in dichorionic twin pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the relationship between the lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness and the onset of labor in dichorionic twin pregnancies experiencing threatened preterm labor.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included dichorionic twin pregnancies between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation, presenting with symptoms of preterm labor. The LUS thickness and mid-anterior wall thickness were measured via transabdominal ultrasonography, cervical length, and posterior cervical lip thickness were measured transvaginally. The presence of the cervical sliding sign and funneling findings were recorded.

Results: Among the patients with an onset of labor before the 34th week, the mean LUS thickness was 3.8 ± 0.9 mm, compared to 4.6 ± 1.1 mm in those with an onset of labor at or after 340/7 GW, indicating a statistically significant difference (p=0.012). Similarly, accepting the GW threshold as 350/7 weeks, a statistically significant difference was found in the mean LUS thickness, which was 4.0 ± 1.0 mm in those with an earlier onset of labor and 4.7 ± 1.0 mm in those with a later onset of labor (p=0.022). While univariate analysis indicated that the LUS thickness was a significant predictor (p=0.017 for <34 GW and p=0.028 for <35 GW), multivariate analysis showed a reduced effect (p=0.04 and p=0.06, respectively).

Conclusions: LUS was significantly thinner in pregnancies with an onset of labor before the 34th and 35th GW. The measurement of the LUS thickness can be considered an alternative method for predicting spontaneous preterm birth in dichorionic twin pregnancies.

在出现早产威胁的双胎妊娠中,子宫下段厚度在预测早产中的作用。
目的研究二绒毛膜双胎妊娠出现早产威胁时,子宫下段(LUS)厚度与分娩开始之间的关系:这项前瞻性队列研究包括妊娠24至32周、出现早产症状的二绒毛膜双胎妊娠。通过经腹超声波检查测量LUS厚度和中前壁厚度,经阴道测量宫颈长度和宫颈后唇厚度。记录宫颈滑动征和漏斗征的出现情况:结果:在第 34 周前开始分娩的患者中,平均 LUS 厚度为 3.8 ± 0.9 mm,而在 340/7 GW 或之后开始分娩的患者中,平均 LUS 厚度为 4.6 ± 1.1 mm,差异有统计学意义(P=0.012)。同样,将 GW 临界值设为 350/7 周时,发现平均 LUS 厚度有显著统计学差异,早产者为 4.0 ± 1.0 mm,晚产者为 4.7 ± 1.0 mm(P=0.022)。单变量分析表明,LUS 厚度是一个重要的预测因素(P=0.017):在第 34 和 35 GW 之前开始分娩的孕妇 LUS 明显较薄。测量 LUS 厚度可被视为预测二绒毛膜双胎妊娠自发性早产的另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信