Impact of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
SARAH GORGIS MD , KARTIK GUPTA MD , ALEJANDRO LEMOR MD , DANA BENTLEY MWC , CHRISTIAN MOYER PhD , THOMAS McRAE MD , MATHEEN KHUDDUS MD , RAHUL SHARMA MD , MICHAEL LIM MD , ALI NSAIR MD , DAVID WOHNS MD , ADITYA MEHRA MD , LANG LIN MD , ADITYA BHARADWAJ MD , RYAN TEDFORD MD , NAVIN KAPUR MD , JENNIFER COWGER MD , WILLIAM O'NEILL MD , MIR B. BASIR DO
{"title":"Impact of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative","authors":"SARAH GORGIS MD ,&nbsp;KARTIK GUPTA MD ,&nbsp;ALEJANDRO LEMOR MD ,&nbsp;DANA BENTLEY MWC ,&nbsp;CHRISTIAN MOYER PhD ,&nbsp;THOMAS McRAE MD ,&nbsp;MATHEEN KHUDDUS MD ,&nbsp;RAHUL SHARMA MD ,&nbsp;MICHAEL LIM MD ,&nbsp;ALI NSAIR MD ,&nbsp;DAVID WOHNS MD ,&nbsp;ADITYA MEHRA MD ,&nbsp;LANG LIN MD ,&nbsp;ADITYA BHARADWAJ MD ,&nbsp;RYAN TEDFORD MD ,&nbsp;NAVIN KAPUR MD ,&nbsp;JENNIFER COWGER MD ,&nbsp;WILLIAM O'NEILL MD ,&nbsp;MIR B. BASIR DO","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) complicates 30%–40% of cases in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS). There are sparse data on the effects of RVD on outcomes and the impact of providing early left ventricular (LV) mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on RV function and hemodynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>Between July 2016 and December 2020, 80 sites participated in the study. All centers agreed to treat patients with AMI-CS using a standard protocol emphasizing invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of LV-MCS. RVD was defined as a right atrial (RA) pressure of &gt;12 mm Hg and a pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) of &lt;1 within 24 hours of the index procedure. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. In a subgroup analysis, data available from the Automated Impella Controller console was used to analyze diastolic suction alarms from LV placement signal and its relation to RVD. A total of 361 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 28% had RVD. The median age was 64 years (interquartile range 55–72 years), 22.7% were female and 75.7% were White. There was no difference in age, sex, or comorbidities between those with or without RVD. Patients with RVD had a higher probability of active CPR during LV-MCS implant (14.7% vs 6.3%), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stage E shock (39.2% vs 23.2%), and higher admission lactate levels (5.1 mg/dL vs 3.0 mg/dL). Survival to discharge was significantly lower among those with RVD (61.8% vs 73.4%, odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.95, <em>P</em> = .031). This association remained significant in the multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic variables within 24 hours of LV-MCS support among those with or without RVD. At 24 hours, patients with a CPO of &gt;0.6 W and a PAPi of &gt;1 had a trend toward better survival to discharge compared with those with a CPO of ≤0.6 W and a PAPi of ≤1 (77.1% vs 54.6%, <em>P</em> = .092). Patients with RVD were significantly more likely to have diastolic suction alarms within 24 hours of LV-MCS initiation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RVD in AMI-CS is common and associated with worse survival to discharge. Early LV-MCS decreases filling pressures rapidly within the first 24 hours and decreases the rate of RVD. Achieving a CPO of &gt;0.6 W and a PAPi of &gt;1 within 24 hours is associated with high survival. Diastolic suction alarms may have usefulness as an early marker of RVD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"30 10","pages":"Pages 1275-1284"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424002720","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) complicates 30%–40% of cases in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS). There are sparse data on the effects of RVD on outcomes and the impact of providing early left ventricular (LV) mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on RV function and hemodynamics.

Methods and Results

Between July 2016 and December 2020, 80 sites participated in the study. All centers agreed to treat patients with AMI-CS using a standard protocol emphasizing invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of LV-MCS. RVD was defined as a right atrial (RA) pressure of >12 mm Hg and a pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) of <1 within 24 hours of the index procedure. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. In a subgroup analysis, data available from the Automated Impella Controller console was used to analyze diastolic suction alarms from LV placement signal and its relation to RVD. A total of 361 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 28% had RVD. The median age was 64 years (interquartile range 55–72 years), 22.7% were female and 75.7% were White. There was no difference in age, sex, or comorbidities between those with or without RVD. Patients with RVD had a higher probability of active CPR during LV-MCS implant (14.7% vs 6.3%), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stage E shock (39.2% vs 23.2%), and higher admission lactate levels (5.1 mg/dL vs 3.0 mg/dL). Survival to discharge was significantly lower among those with RVD (61.8% vs 73.4%, odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.95, P = .031). This association remained significant in the multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic variables within 24 hours of LV-MCS support among those with or without RVD. At 24 hours, patients with a CPO of >0.6 W and a PAPi of >1 had a trend toward better survival to discharge compared with those with a CPO of ≤0.6 W and a PAPi of ≤1 (77.1% vs 54.6%, P = .092). Patients with RVD were significantly more likely to have diastolic suction alarms within 24 hours of LV-MCS initiation.

Conclusions

RVD in AMI-CS is common and associated with worse survival to discharge. Early LV-MCS decreases filling pressures rapidly within the first 24 hours and decreases the rate of RVD. Achieving a CPO of >0.6 W and a PAPi of >1 within 24 hours is associated with high survival. Diastolic suction alarms may have usefulness as an early marker of RVD.
右心室功能障碍对急性心肌梗死和心源性休克预后的影响:全国心源性休克倡议的启示。
背景:30%-40%的急性心肌梗死(AMI)和心源性休克(CS)患者会并发右心室功能障碍(RVD)。有关 RVD 对预后的影响以及早期提供左心室机械循环支持(MCS)对 RV 功能和血流动力学的影响的数据很少:2016年7月至2020年12月期间,80个研究机构参与了这项研究。所有中心均同意采用标准方案治疗 AMI-CS 患者,该方案强调有创血流动力学监测和快速启动 LV-MCS。RVD定义为右心房(RA)压>12 mm Hg、肺动脉搏动指数(PAPI)0.6 W和PAPi>1,与CPO≤0.6 W和PAPi≤1的患者相比,RVD患者的出院存活率有更高的趋势(77.1% vs 54.6%,P = .092)。有RVD的患者在LV-MCS启动后24小时内出现舒张期抽吸警报的几率明显更高:结论:RVD在AMI-CS中很常见,并与较差的出院生存率相关。结论:RVD 在 AMI-CS 中很常见,与出院生存率降低有关。早期 LV-MCS 可在最初 24 小时内迅速降低充盈压,降低 RVD 发生率。24 小时内 CPO >0.6 W 和 PAPi >1 与高存活率相关。舒张期抽吸警报可作为 RVD 的早期标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信