Clinical Outcomes of Patients Experiencing Transient Loss of Pulse Pressure During High-Risk PCI with Impella

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
MIR B. BASIR DO , DANA BENTLEY BA , ALEXANDER G. TRUESDELL MD , KATHERINE KUNKEL MD , ALEJANDRO LEMOR MD , MICHAEL MEGALY MD , MOHAMMAD ALQARQAZ MD , KHALDOON ALASWAD MD , AKSHAY KHANDEWAL MD , ELISE JORTBERG MS , SANJOG KALRA MD , AMIR KAKI MD , DANIEL BURKHOFF MD , JEFFREY W. MOSES MD , DUANE S. PINTO MD , GREGG W. STONE MD , WILLIAM W. O'NEILL MD
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Patients Experiencing Transient Loss of Pulse Pressure During High-Risk PCI with Impella","authors":"MIR B. BASIR DO ,&nbsp;DANA BENTLEY BA ,&nbsp;ALEXANDER G. TRUESDELL MD ,&nbsp;KATHERINE KUNKEL MD ,&nbsp;ALEJANDRO LEMOR MD ,&nbsp;MICHAEL MEGALY MD ,&nbsp;MOHAMMAD ALQARQAZ MD ,&nbsp;KHALDOON ALASWAD MD ,&nbsp;AKSHAY KHANDEWAL MD ,&nbsp;ELISE JORTBERG MS ,&nbsp;SANJOG KALRA MD ,&nbsp;AMIR KAKI MD ,&nbsp;DANIEL BURKHOFF MD ,&nbsp;JEFFREY W. MOSES MD ,&nbsp;DUANE S. PINTO MD ,&nbsp;GREGG W. STONE MD ,&nbsp;WILLIAM W. O'NEILL MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients experiencing loss of pulse pressure (LOPP) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) are transiently dependent on mechanical circulatory support devices. We sought to define the frequency and clinic outcomes of patients who experience LOPP during HR-PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>Patients enrolled in the PROTECT III study and had automated Impella controller logs capturing real-time hemodynamics were included in this analysis. A LOPP event was defined as a mean pulse pressure on Impella of &lt;20 mm Hg for ≥5 seconds during PCI. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were then compared between those with and without LOPP. Logistic regression identified clinical and hemodynamic predictors of LOPP. We included 302 patients, of whom 148 patients (49%) experienced LOPP. Age, sex, and comorbidities were similar in patients with and without LOPP. Mean baseline systolic blood pressure (118.6 mm Hg vs 129.8 mm Hg; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and mean arterial pressure (86.9 mm Hg vs 91.6 mm Hg; <em>P</em> = .011) were lower in patients with LOPP, whereas heart rate (78 bpm vs 73 bpm; <em>P</em> = .012) was higher. Anatomical complexity was similar between groups. Patients with LOPP were more likely to experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (23.5% vs 8.8%; <em>P</em> = .002), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs 2.6%; <em>P</em> = .030), and death (20.2% vs 7.9%; <em>P</em> = .008) within 90 days. A low baseline systolic blood pressure and cardiomyopathy were the strongest predictors of LOPP (<em>P</em> = .003 and <em>P</em> = .001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LOPP on Impella during HR-PCI was common and occurred more frequently in patients with cardiomyopathy and a low systolic blood pressure. LOPP was strongly associated with higher 90-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, acute kidney injury, and mortality.</div><div><strong>Condensed Abstract</strong></div><div>We sought to define the frequency and clinic outcomes of patients who experience LOPP during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). We included 302 patients, of whom 148 (49%) experienced LOPP. Patients with LOPP were more likely to experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (23.5% vs 8.8%; P = .002), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs 2.6%; P = .030), and death (20.2% vs 7.9%; P = .008) within 90 days. A low baseline systolic blood pressure and cardiomyopathy were the strongest predictors of LOPP (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"30 10","pages":"Pages 1287-1299"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424002732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients experiencing loss of pulse pressure (LOPP) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) are transiently dependent on mechanical circulatory support devices. We sought to define the frequency and clinic outcomes of patients who experience LOPP during HR-PCI.

Methods and Results

Patients enrolled in the PROTECT III study and had automated Impella controller logs capturing real-time hemodynamics were included in this analysis. A LOPP event was defined as a mean pulse pressure on Impella of <20 mm Hg for ≥5 seconds during PCI. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were then compared between those with and without LOPP. Logistic regression identified clinical and hemodynamic predictors of LOPP. We included 302 patients, of whom 148 patients (49%) experienced LOPP. Age, sex, and comorbidities were similar in patients with and without LOPP. Mean baseline systolic blood pressure (118.6 mm Hg vs 129.8 mm Hg; P < .001) and mean arterial pressure (86.9 mm Hg vs 91.6 mm Hg; P = .011) were lower in patients with LOPP, whereas heart rate (78 bpm vs 73 bpm; P = .012) was higher. Anatomical complexity was similar between groups. Patients with LOPP were more likely to experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (23.5% vs 8.8%; P = .002), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs 2.6%; P = .030), and death (20.2% vs 7.9%; P = .008) within 90 days. A low baseline systolic blood pressure and cardiomyopathy were the strongest predictors of LOPP (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively).

Conclusions

LOPP on Impella during HR-PCI was common and occurred more frequently in patients with cardiomyopathy and a low systolic blood pressure. LOPP was strongly associated with higher 90-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, acute kidney injury, and mortality.
Condensed Abstract
We sought to define the frequency and clinic outcomes of patients who experience LOPP during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). We included 302 patients, of whom 148 (49%) experienced LOPP. Patients with LOPP were more likely to experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (23.5% vs 8.8%; P = .002), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs 2.6%; P = .030), and death (20.2% vs 7.9%; P = .008) within 90 days. A low baseline systolic blood pressure and cardiomyopathy were the strongest predictors of LOPP (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively).
使用 Impella 进行高风险 PCI 期间出现短暂脉压下降的患者的临床疗效。
背景:在高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HR-PCI)过程中出现脉搏失压(LOPP)的患者会暂时依赖于机械循环支持装置。我们试图确定在 HR-PCI 过程中出现 LOPP 的患者的频率和临床结果:参加 PROTECT III 研究并有 Impella 控制器自动日志记录实时血流动力学的患者被纳入本次分析。LOPP事件定义为Impella上的平均脉压达到结论:HR-PCI 期间 Impella 的 LOPP 很常见,在心肌病和收缩压较低的患者中发生得更频繁。LOPP 与较高的 90 天主要不良心脑血管事件、急性肾损伤和死亡率密切相关。摘要 我们试图确定在高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HR-PCI)过程中出现 LOPP 的患者的频率和临床结果。我们纳入了 302 名患者,其中 148 人(49%)经历过 LOPP。LOPP 患者更有可能在 90 天内发生重大不良心脑血管事件(23.5% vs 8.8%;P = .002)、急性肾损伤(10.1% vs 2.6%;P = .030)和死亡(20.2% vs 7.9%;P = .008)。低基线收缩压和心肌病是预测 LOPP 的最有力因素(分别为 P = .003 和 P = .001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信