Menstrual cycle and the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning against endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury: comparison with postmenopausal women.
Janinka Nina Durchslag, Shelby M Tanner, Alexandra R Mason, Nasya R Roth, Alexia S Thiros, Gary P Van Guilder
{"title":"Menstrual cycle and the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning against endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury: comparison with postmenopausal women.","authors":"Janinka Nina Durchslag, Shelby M Tanner, Alexandra R Mason, Nasya R Roth, Alexia S Thiros, Gary P Van Guilder","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00127.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine whether the capacity of remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) against endothelial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury changes across the menstrual cycle in premenopausal women and to compare IPC responses to postmenopausal women. Thirty-five women were studied (22 premenopausal/13 postmenopausal). Changes in endothelial function were determined during the early follicular vs. the late follicular phase (after positive urine ovulation test; <i>Study 1</i>), vs. the mid-luteal phase (after positive urine progesterone test; <i>Study 2</i>), and vs. estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women; <i>Study 3).</i> Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed by the forearm blood flow (FBF) to reactive hyperemia with/without I/R injury with remote IPC (3 × 5 min cycles of upper arm ischemia). In the premenopausal women, peak FBF responses during the early follicular phase were blunted 20% (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) with I/R injury (from baseline: 23.4 ± 6.2 to 19.5 ± 4.9 mL/100 mL tissue/min) compared with the late follicular/mid-luteal phases despite IPC. In postmenopausal women, peak FBF was diminished (from: 21.1 ± 5.1 to 17.2 ± 4.4 mL/100 mL tissue/min), and total FBF (area under the curve) was decreased a third (-32%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) with I/R injury. Protection from I/R injury was preserved during the late follicular (from baseline: 21.7 ± 5.3 to 24.8 ± 5.9 mL/100 mL tissue/min; <i>P</i> = 0.109) and mid-luteal phases (from: 25.1 ± 3.9 to 27.2 ± 5.7 mL/100 mL tissue/min; <i>P</i> = 0.267). Reduced estrogen during the early follicular phase and the rise in estrogen associated with ovulation and the mid-luteal phase may contribute to changes in IPC-mediated protection in premenopausal women and shed light on how cardioprotection may change with ovarian hormone deficiency with the menopause transition.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The capacity of remote ischemic preconditioning to protect against vascular endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury varies widely across the phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy premenopausal women. Robust protection was afforded during the late follicular and mid-luteal phases. In contrast, weakened protection was demonstrated during the early follicular phase, with a level of impairment similar to estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1446-1457"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00127.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the capacity of remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) against endothelial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury changes across the menstrual cycle in premenopausal women and to compare IPC responses to postmenopausal women. Thirty-five women were studied (22 premenopausal/13 postmenopausal). Changes in endothelial function were determined during the early follicular vs. the late follicular phase (after positive urine ovulation test; Study 1), vs. the mid-luteal phase (after positive urine progesterone test; Study 2), and vs. estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women; Study 3). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed by the forearm blood flow (FBF) to reactive hyperemia with/without I/R injury with remote IPC (3 × 5 min cycles of upper arm ischemia). In the premenopausal women, peak FBF responses during the early follicular phase were blunted 20% (P < 0.0001) with I/R injury (from baseline: 23.4 ± 6.2 to 19.5 ± 4.9 mL/100 mL tissue/min) compared with the late follicular/mid-luteal phases despite IPC. In postmenopausal women, peak FBF was diminished (from: 21.1 ± 5.1 to 17.2 ± 4.4 mL/100 mL tissue/min), and total FBF (area under the curve) was decreased a third (-32%; P < 0.001) with I/R injury. Protection from I/R injury was preserved during the late follicular (from baseline: 21.7 ± 5.3 to 24.8 ± 5.9 mL/100 mL tissue/min; P = 0.109) and mid-luteal phases (from: 25.1 ± 3.9 to 27.2 ± 5.7 mL/100 mL tissue/min; P = 0.267). Reduced estrogen during the early follicular phase and the rise in estrogen associated with ovulation and the mid-luteal phase may contribute to changes in IPC-mediated protection in premenopausal women and shed light on how cardioprotection may change with ovarian hormone deficiency with the menopause transition.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The capacity of remote ischemic preconditioning to protect against vascular endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury varies widely across the phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy premenopausal women. Robust protection was afforded during the late follicular and mid-luteal phases. In contrast, weakened protection was demonstrated during the early follicular phase, with a level of impairment similar to estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.