Prognostic role of serum copeptin levels in adults with graded traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03818-y
Olgun Demir, Adem Az, Sumeyye Cakmak, Ozgur Sogut
{"title":"Prognostic role of serum copeptin levels in adults with graded traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Olgun Demir, Adem Az, Sumeyye Cakmak, Ozgur Sogut","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03818-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of copeptin in patients with severe head injuries remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the role of serum copeptin levels in detecting intracranial injury, assessing trauma severity, and predicting outcomes in adults with graded traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective non-randomized controlled study enrolled 78 adults with isolated head trauma, as well as 59 age- and sex-matched controls. Baseline serum copeptin levels were measured in both groups. Patients were categorized by head trauma severity using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (severe GCS 3-8, moderate GCS 9-13, mild GCS 14-15) and by the presence of intracerebral or extracerebral lesions on cranial computed tomography (CCT). Patients were also classified as survivors or non-survivors. Serum copeptin levels were compared among these.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean serum copeptin levels were significantly higher in patients with graded TBI than in controls. Furthermore, patients with severe and moderate head trauma had significantly higher copeptin levels compared with patients exhibiting mild trauma. An optimal copeptin cutoff value of > 1147 pg/mL was identified, indicating the presence of moderate or severe trauma in TBI patients. Patients with abnormal CCT findings had significantly higher mean serum copeptin levels compared with patients exhibiting normal CCT scans. Non-survivors also showed significantly higher serum copeptin levels compared with survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum copeptin levels rise after graded TBI and can distinguish between patients with and without intracranial or extracranial lesions evident on CCT. Copeptin levels also aid in identifying moderate or severe TBI and in predicting 28-day mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"353-360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03818-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of copeptin in patients with severe head injuries remains unclear.

Aims: To investigate the role of serum copeptin levels in detecting intracranial injury, assessing trauma severity, and predicting outcomes in adults with graded traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: This prospective non-randomized controlled study enrolled 78 adults with isolated head trauma, as well as 59 age- and sex-matched controls. Baseline serum copeptin levels were measured in both groups. Patients were categorized by head trauma severity using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (severe GCS 3-8, moderate GCS 9-13, mild GCS 14-15) and by the presence of intracerebral or extracerebral lesions on cranial computed tomography (CCT). Patients were also classified as survivors or non-survivors. Serum copeptin levels were compared among these.

Results: Mean serum copeptin levels were significantly higher in patients with graded TBI than in controls. Furthermore, patients with severe and moderate head trauma had significantly higher copeptin levels compared with patients exhibiting mild trauma. An optimal copeptin cutoff value of > 1147 pg/mL was identified, indicating the presence of moderate or severe trauma in TBI patients. Patients with abnormal CCT findings had significantly higher mean serum copeptin levels compared with patients exhibiting normal CCT scans. Non-survivors also showed significantly higher serum copeptin levels compared with survivors.

Conclusion: Serum copeptin levels rise after graded TBI and can distinguish between patients with and without intracranial or extracranial lesions evident on CCT. Copeptin levels also aid in identifying moderate or severe TBI and in predicting 28-day mortality.

分级脑外伤成人血清 copeptin 水平的预后作用。
背景:目的:研究血清 copeptin 水平在检测颅内损伤、评估创伤严重程度以及预测分级创伤性脑损伤(TBI)成人预后方面的作用:这项前瞻性非随机对照研究共招募了 78 名患有孤立性头部创伤的成人以及 59 名年龄和性别匹配的对照组。对两组患者的血清 copeptin 水平进行了基线测量。根据格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分(重度 GCS 3-8、中度 GCS 9-13、轻度 GCS 14-15)和头颅计算机断层扫描(CCT)显示的脑内或脑外病变情况,对患者的头部创伤严重程度进行分类。患者还被分为幸存者和非幸存者。对这些患者的血清 copeptin 水平进行了比较:结果:分级创伤性脑损伤患者的平均血清 copeptin 水平明显高于对照组。此外,与轻度创伤患者相比,重度和中度头部创伤患者的 copeptin 水平明显更高。已确定的最佳 copeptin 临界值为 > 1147 pg/mL,表明创伤性脑损伤患者存在中度或重度创伤。与 CCT 扫描结果正常的患者相比,CCT 结果异常的患者血清中的平均 copeptin 水平明显更高。非幸存者的血清 copeptin 水平也明显高于幸存者:结论:分级 TBI 后,血清 copeptin 水平升高,可以区分 CCT 显示有颅内或颅外病变的患者和无颅内或颅外病变的患者。Copeptin水平还有助于识别中度或重度创伤性脑损伤,并预测28天的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信