An automated commercial open access assay for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium macrolide resistance.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Apmis Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1111/apm.13477
Ylva Lindroth, Lucia Hansson, Ola Forslund
{"title":"An automated commercial open access assay for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium macrolide resistance.","authors":"Ylva Lindroth, Lucia Hansson, Ola Forslund","doi":"10.1111/apm.13477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Azithromycin, a macrolide antibioticum, is the first-line treatment for Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), but resistant MG is an increasing problem. Macrolide resistance-mediated mutations (MRM) has been linked to point mutations in region V of the MG 23S rRNA gene. We have evaluated an open access analyzer (Panther Fusion, Hologic Inc) for detectability of MRM (mutations A2071G and A2072G) and MG wild type (WT) in clinical samples. Also, the agreement of the Panther Fusion assay results with a corresponding established In-house MRM-WT PCR (ABI 7500) was calculated. Left over material from 55 clinical samples positive for MG by the Aptima test (Hologic) based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), collected from January to February 2023 in Region Skåne, Sweden, was analyzed. Specific amplification curves were generated for positive controls of MG mutations (A2071G and A2072G) and WT by the Panther Fusion assay. The limit of detection (LOD) was 5.3 copies/mL for WT, 8.1 copies/mL for mutation A2071G, and 81 copies/mL for mutation A2072G. The overall concordance was 91% between the Panther Fusion and the In-house PCR (Kappa 0.621, 95% CI; 0.327-0.914) for detection of WT or MRM in MG-positive clinical samples. The Panther Fusion detected MRM in 20% (11/55) and WT in 62% (34/55) of the samples. The corresponding In-house PCR results were 25% (14/55) and 65% (36/55). In summary, the Panther Fusion assay demonstrated detection of low copy number of MRM and WT of MG. Among clinical samples substantial agreement between the Panther Fusion and In-house PCR results was observed. Integrating MG-analysis (TMA) and MRM-WT assay on the Panther platform could make MRM testing more readily available. However, the Panther Fusion had a lower success rate (82% vs 90%) for macrolide susceptibility testing, hence testing with a complementary method should be considered for samples where neither WT nor MRM MG are detectable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Azithromycin, a macrolide antibioticum, is the first-line treatment for Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), but resistant MG is an increasing problem. Macrolide resistance-mediated mutations (MRM) has been linked to point mutations in region V of the MG 23S rRNA gene. We have evaluated an open access analyzer (Panther Fusion, Hologic Inc) for detectability of MRM (mutations A2071G and A2072G) and MG wild type (WT) in clinical samples. Also, the agreement of the Panther Fusion assay results with a corresponding established In-house MRM-WT PCR (ABI 7500) was calculated. Left over material from 55 clinical samples positive for MG by the Aptima test (Hologic) based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), collected from January to February 2023 in Region Skåne, Sweden, was analyzed. Specific amplification curves were generated for positive controls of MG mutations (A2071G and A2072G) and WT by the Panther Fusion assay. The limit of detection (LOD) was 5.3 copies/mL for WT, 8.1 copies/mL for mutation A2071G, and 81 copies/mL for mutation A2072G. The overall concordance was 91% between the Panther Fusion and the In-house PCR (Kappa 0.621, 95% CI; 0.327-0.914) for detection of WT or MRM in MG-positive clinical samples. The Panther Fusion detected MRM in 20% (11/55) and WT in 62% (34/55) of the samples. The corresponding In-house PCR results were 25% (14/55) and 65% (36/55). In summary, the Panther Fusion assay demonstrated detection of low copy number of MRM and WT of MG. Among clinical samples substantial agreement between the Panther Fusion and In-house PCR results was observed. Integrating MG-analysis (TMA) and MRM-WT assay on the Panther platform could make MRM testing more readily available. However, the Panther Fusion had a lower success rate (82% vs 90%) for macrolide susceptibility testing, hence testing with a complementary method should be considered for samples where neither WT nor MRM MG are detectable.

用于检测生殖器支原体对大环内酯类药物耐药性的自动商业开放式测定法。
大环内酯类抗生素阿奇霉素是治疗生殖器支原体(MG)的一线药物,但MG的耐药性问题日益严重。大环内酯类药物耐药性介导的突变(MRM)与 MG 23S rRNA 基因 V 区的点突变有关。我们评估了一种开放式分析仪(Panther Fusion,Hologic Inc)对临床样本中 MRM(突变 A2071G 和 A2072G)和 MG 野生型(WT)的检测能力。此外,还计算了 Panther Fusion 检测结果与相应的内部 MRM-WT PCR(ABI 7500)结果的一致性。对 2023 年 1 月至 2 月期间在瑞典斯科讷地区收集的 55 份临床样本进行了分析,这些样本经 Aptima 检验(Hologic)发现 MG 阳性,该检验基于转录介导扩增(TMA)。通过 Panther Fusion 检测法生成了 MG 突变(A2071G 和 A2072G)和 WT 阳性对照的特定扩增曲线。WT的检测限(LOD)为5.3拷贝/毫升,突变A2071G为8.1拷贝/毫升,突变A2072G为81拷贝/毫升。在 MG 阳性临床样本中检测 WT 或 MRM 时,Panther Fusion 与内部 PCR 的总体一致性为 91%(Kappa 0.621,95% CI;0.327-0.914)。Panther Fusion 在 20% 的样本(11/55)中检测出 MRM,在 62% 的样本(34/55)中检测出 WT。相应的内部 PCR 结果分别为 25%(14/55)和 65%(36/55)。总之,Panther Fusion 检测法能检测出 MG 的低拷贝数 MRM 和 WT。在临床样本中,Panther Fusion 和内部 PCR 的结果基本一致。在 Panther 平台上整合 MG 分析(TMA)和 MRM-WT 检测可使 MRM 检测更易于使用。不过,Panther Fusion 的大环内酯类药物敏感性检测成功率较低(82% 对 90%),因此在 WT 和 MRM MG 都检测不到的样本中,应考虑使用补充方法进行检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信