Protamine Dosing for Heparin Reversal Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial Comparing Two Strategies.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pankaj Jain, Alejandra Silva-De Las Salas, Kabir Bedi, Joseph Lamelas, Richard H Epstein, Michael Fabbro Ii
{"title":"Protamine Dosing for Heparin Reversal Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial Comparing Two Strategies.","authors":"Pankaj Jain, Alejandra Silva-De Las Salas, Kabir Bedi, Joseph Lamelas, Richard H Epstein, Michael Fabbro Ii","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug shortages are a frequent challenge in current clinical practice. Certain drugs, (e.g., protamine) lack alternatives and inadequate supplies can limit access to services. Conventional protamine dosing uses heparin ratio-based calculations for heparin reversal following CPB and may result in excess protamine utilization, and potential harm due to its intrinsic anticoagulation. We hypothesized that a fixed 250-mg protamine dose would be comparable, as measured by the activated clotting time, to a 1:1 (1 mg for every 100 U) protamine to heparin ratio-based strategy for heparin reversal and that protamine would be conserved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center, double-blinded trial, consenting elective adult cardiac surgical patients without pre-existing coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulation, and a calculated initial heparin dose of ≥ 27500 U were randomized to receive, following CPB, protamine as a fixed dose (250 mg) or a ratio-based dose (1 mg:100 U heparin). The primary outcome was the activated clotting time following initial protamine administration, assessed by Student's t-test. Secondary outcomes included total protamine, the need for additional protamine, and the cumulative 24-h chest tube output.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 62 and 63 patients in the fixed- and ratio-based dose groups, respectively. The mean post-protamine ACT was not different between groups (-2.0 s, 95% CI -7.2 to 3.3 s, P = 0.47). Less total protamine per case was administered in the fixed-dose group (2.1 50-mg vials, 95% CI -2.4 to -1.8, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the cumulative 24-h chest tube output (difference = -77 ml, 95% CI 220 to 65 ml, P = 0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 1: 1 heparin ratio-based protamine dosing strategy compared to a fixed 250-mg dose resulted in the administration of a larger total dose of protamine no difference in either the initial ACT or the amount postoperative chest-tube bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005256","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug shortages are a frequent challenge in current clinical practice. Certain drugs, (e.g., protamine) lack alternatives and inadequate supplies can limit access to services. Conventional protamine dosing uses heparin ratio-based calculations for heparin reversal following CPB and may result in excess protamine utilization, and potential harm due to its intrinsic anticoagulation. We hypothesized that a fixed 250-mg protamine dose would be comparable, as measured by the activated clotting time, to a 1:1 (1 mg for every 100 U) protamine to heparin ratio-based strategy for heparin reversal and that protamine would be conserved.

Methods: In a single-center, double-blinded trial, consenting elective adult cardiac surgical patients without pre-existing coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulation, and a calculated initial heparin dose of ≥ 27500 U were randomized to receive, following CPB, protamine as a fixed dose (250 mg) or a ratio-based dose (1 mg:100 U heparin). The primary outcome was the activated clotting time following initial protamine administration, assessed by Student's t-test. Secondary outcomes included total protamine, the need for additional protamine, and the cumulative 24-h chest tube output.

Results: There were 62 and 63 patients in the fixed- and ratio-based dose groups, respectively. The mean post-protamine ACT was not different between groups (-2.0 s, 95% CI -7.2 to 3.3 s, P = 0.47). Less total protamine per case was administered in the fixed-dose group (2.1 50-mg vials, 95% CI -2.4 to -1.8, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the cumulative 24-h chest tube output (difference = -77 ml, 95% CI 220 to 65 ml, P = 0.28).

Conclusions: A 1: 1 heparin ratio-based protamine dosing strategy compared to a fixed 250-mg dose resulted in the administration of a larger total dose of protamine no difference in either the initial ACT or the amount postoperative chest-tube bleeding.

心肺搭桥术后肝素逆转的原胺剂量:比较两种策略的双盲前瞻性随机对照试验。
背景:药物短缺是当前临床实践中经常遇到的挑战。某些药物(如质胺)缺乏替代品,供应不足会限制服务的获取。传统的质胺剂量使用基于肝素比值的计算方法,用于 CPB 后的肝素逆转,可能会导致过量使用质胺,并因其固有的抗凝作用而造成潜在危害。我们假设,根据活化凝血时间测量,固定的 250 毫克质胺剂量与基于 1:1 (每 100 U 1 毫克)质胺与肝素比值的肝素逆转策略相当,而且质胺将得到保存:在一项单中心、双盲试验中,征得同意的择期成人心脏手术患者在进行心肺复苏术后随机接受固定剂量(250 毫克)或按比例剂量(1 毫克:100 毫升肝素)的原胺治疗,这些患者均无凝血功能障碍或正在接受抗凝治疗,且肝素初始剂量计算值≥ 27500 U。主要结果是首次使用质胺后的活化凝血时间,通过学生 t 检验进行评估。次要结果包括质胺总量、追加质胺的需要量和 24 小时胸管累计排出量:固定剂量组和比例剂量组分别有 62 和 63 名患者。两组患者使用原胺后的平均 ACT 没有差异(-2.0 秒,95% CI -7.2 至 3.3 秒,P = 0.47)。固定剂量组每个病例使用的原胺总量较少(2.1 50 毫克瓶,95% CI -2.4 至 -1.8 ,P < 0.0001)。24 小时胸管累积排出量无差异(差异 = -77 毫升,95% CI 220 至 65 毫升,P = 0.28):结论:与固定的 250 毫克剂量相比,基于 1: 1 肝素比例的原发性胺给药策略导致原发性胺总剂量更大,但初始 ACT 或术后胸管出血量均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信