The spectrum of hematologic neoplasms in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Yiannis Petros Dimopoulos, Wei Wang, Sa A. Wang, Sanam Loghavi, Courtney D. DiNardo, Yoheved Gerstein, Shimin Hu, Zhenya Tang, Charmaine Joyce Lim Ilagan, Beenu Thakral, Siba El Hussein, Jie Xu, Shaoying Li, Pei Lin, Keyur P. Patel, Chi Young Ok, L. Jeffrey Medeiros, Hong Fang
{"title":"The spectrum of hematologic neoplasms in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome","authors":"Yiannis Petros Dimopoulos,&nbsp;Wei Wang,&nbsp;Sa A. Wang,&nbsp;Sanam Loghavi,&nbsp;Courtney D. DiNardo,&nbsp;Yoheved Gerstein,&nbsp;Shimin Hu,&nbsp;Zhenya Tang,&nbsp;Charmaine Joyce Lim Ilagan,&nbsp;Beenu Thakral,&nbsp;Siba El Hussein,&nbsp;Jie Xu,&nbsp;Shaoying Li,&nbsp;Pei Lin,&nbsp;Keyur P. Patel,&nbsp;Chi Young Ok,&nbsp;L. Jeffrey Medeiros,&nbsp;Hong Fang","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare inherited disorder associated with germline pathogenic <i>TP53</i> variants. The absence of the functional gene product, p53 protein, results in failure to activate programmed cell death in the appropriate context and leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation. LFS patients present with a high incidence of various malignancies, often at young ages. In contrast to the high occurrence rate of solid tumors, hematologic neoplasms in LFS patients are relatively rare and not systemically described. A few previous studies showed that leukemias developed in about 2%–4% of LFS patients, whereas lymphomas are less frequent, seen in approximately 2% of LFS patients.<span><sup>1-3</sup></span></p><p>This study explored the clinicopathologic spectrum of hematologic neoplasms in LFS patients. Eighteen patients with a well-established clinical diagnosis of LFS and confirmatory <i>TP53</i> genetic testing as well as a hematologic neoplasm were included, spanning the time interval from 1/1/2000 through 8/5/2023. Their LFS diagnosis was further confirmed by our LFS Progeny Database and/or Clinical Cancer Genetics (CCG) team that runs the LFS program in our institution. Four previously reported patients (cases #1, 2, 6, 7 in that cohort)<span><sup>4</sup></span> were included in this study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest cohort described to date.</p><p>The cohort included 12 (67%) women and 6 (33%) men. Their clinical history and hematologic diagnoses are presented in Table 1. All patients had a confirmed germline pathogenic variant of <i>TP53</i> at MD Anderson Cancer Center and/or an outside institution, although the detailed nomenclature of <i>TP53</i> germline mutation in 4 patients (cases #1, 8, 14, 18) tested at an outside institution was not available. All 18 patients had an extensive family history of malignancies (Supplementary Table 1). Seventeen (94%) patients had other malignant or pre-malignant neoplasms in additional to hematologic malignancy; 7 (39%) patients had one neoplasm and 10 (56%) patients had ≥2 neoplasms. The most common non-hematologic malignancies were breast cancer (9/18, 50%), sarcoma (8/18, 44%), and gastrointestinal tumors (5/18, 28%). The only patient without any other neoplasm (case #18) was diagnosed with B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL/LBL) at the age of 11 years and died 4 years later.</p><p>The median age at diagnosis of the first malignancy was 32 years (range, 1–54 years) and the median age at diagnosis of hematologic neoplasm was 41 years (range, 11–73 years). The initial presenting hematologic neoplasms included myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (<i>n</i> = 10, 56%), “de novo” acute myeloid leukemia (AML) developing in patients without a prior history of MDS or other hematologic neoplasms (<i>n</i> = 2, 11%), B-ALL/LBL (<i>n</i> = 2, 11%), plasma cell neoplasms (PCN) (<i>n</i> = 2, 11%), T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) (<i>n</i> = 1, 6%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (<i>n</i> = 1, 6%). Fifteen (83%) hematologic neoplasms occurred after the diagnosis of other tumors. In the remaining 3 patients, 1 T-ALL/LBL (case #5) was diagnosed with a synchronous astrocytoma, 1 B-ALL/LBL (case #7) was followed by high grade dysplasia in a gastric adenoma, and another B-ALL/LBL (case #18) was diagnosed in a 11-year-old patient without any other malignancies.</p><p>At initial presentation of hematologic neoplasm, 11 (61%) patients had a history of exposure to chemotherapy or radiation therapy (“cytotoxic exposure”) for other tumors. This exposure occurred with a median interval of 111 months (range: 3–240 months) prior to the diagnosis of the hematologic neoplasm. All these 11 patients presented with a myeloid neoplasm, including 9 MDS and 2 “de novo” AML. Among 9 MDS cases, 4 developed secondary AML with a median interval of 9.5 months (range, 3–15 months). The 7 patients without a history of cytotoxic exposure included 1 MDS, 1 T-ALL/LBL, 2 B-ALL/LBL, 1 MPN, and 2 PCN. Among this group, 1 patient (case #18) presented initially with B-ALL/LBL, was treated with chemoradiation and developed MDS 43 months later.</p><p>Cytogenetic findings from bone marrow aspirate samples are summarized in Table 1 (detailed karyotype in Supplementary Table 2). Conventional cytogenetic analysis showed a complex karyotype in all MDS (<i>n</i> = 10), AML (<i>n</i> = 2) and T-ALL/LBL (<i>n</i> = 1) cases. The 2 B-ALL/LBL cases had a hypodiploid (case #18) and a possible hypodiploid (case #7) karyotype, respectively. The remaining 3 cases (1 MPN and 2 PCN) showed a normal karyotype. By conventional cytogenetic analysis, chromosome 17 alterations were seen in 4 MDS, 2 B-ALL/LBL, 1 AML, and 1 T-ALL/LBL cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results were available for 10 neoplasms, showing monosomy 17 and/or loss of one <i>TP53</i> allele in 6 neoplasms. Incorporating conventional cytogenetic and FISH/aCGH data, 9 patients had <i>TP53</i> deletion at cytogenetic level (monosomy 17 or loss of <i>TP53</i> signal).</p><p>Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) data from bone marrow aspirate samples were available for 17 cases (Table 1). Three patients showed an additional somatic <i>TP53</i> mutation besides the germline <i>TP53</i> mutation (cases #4, 9, 10). Of the 14 patients with detailed information on germline <i>TP53</i> variants, 10 (71%) germline mutations occurred in the DNA binding domain (exons 5–8), including 2 in exon 5, 2 in exon 6, 5 in exon 7, and 1 in exon 8. The remaining 4 germline mutations included 3 in exon 4 and 1 involving exons 10 and 11. Missense mutations were most common (<i>n</i> = 10, 71%), followed by frameshift (<i>n</i> = 3, 21%) and nonsense (<i>n</i> = 1, 7%). Among the missense mutations, <i>TP53</i> p.R248Q was most common, detected in 3 patients (cases #3, 15, 17). Of the 4 patients without a detailed germline <i>TP53</i> mutational profile, 3 (cases #1, 8, 14) had a <i>TP53</i> mutation (possibly germline) detected by NGS. The remaining 1 case (#18) did not have material to perform the analysis.</p><p>In the newly published WHO and ICC classifications of myeloid neoplasms, great emphasis was placed on <i>TP53</i> status, with a separate category of MDS/AML proposed to include cases with biallelic alterations of <i>TP53</i>. Integrating cytogenetic and molecular data, 14 cases in this cohort demonstrated a presumed biallelic <i>TP53</i> alteration (Table 1) based on a high variant allele frequency of the mutant <i>TP53</i> (cases #3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15), two separate <i>TP53</i> mutations (cases #4, 9, 10), or a <i>TP53</i> mutation paired with a cytogenetic alteration involving the <i>TP53</i> locus at chromosome 17p (cases #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, and 16). In the remaining 4 cases, 3 did not have FISH study performed for evaluation of <i>TP53</i> deletion status, thus their biallelic <i>TP53</i> status is uncertain. The remaining one case (#17) showed no <i>TP53</i> deletion by FISH, arguing against biallelic <i>TP53</i> alteration.</p><p>The treatment regimens and survival data for the hematologic neoplasms are summarized in Supplementary Table 3. Nine patients underwent stem cell transplant (SCT), including 5 MDS, 1 AML, 2 B-ALL/LBL, and 1 T-ALL/LBL. At the time of last clinical follow up, 9 (50%) patients died, including 5 MDS, 2 AML, 1 T-ALL/LBL, and 1 B-ALL/LBL. The median overall survival (OS) time from the diagnosis of the first malignancy was 198.0 months and the median OS from the diagnosis of the hematologic neoplasm was 28.8 months. To explore the prognosis of patients with MDS or AML, we compared the OS of these patients with TCGA cohort of AML patients stratified by using the European LeukemiaNet standardized system for cytogenetic risk.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Only patients younger than 55 years were included to achieve a group of similar median age to this cohort. The analyses showed that the MDS/AML patients in this cohort showed a poorer OS than the TCGA AML patients with favorable cytogenetic risk (median, 19.7 months vs. not reached, <i>p</i> = .0002) and a similar OS to TCGA AML patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk (median, 19.7 vs. 27.0 months, <i>p</i> = .89) and those with unfavorable cytogenetic risk (median, 19.7 vs. 12.2 months, <i>p</i> = .60).</p><p>In contrast to previous studies which showed that hematologic neoplasms in LFS patients mainly occurred in children with B-ALL/LBL being the most common,<span><sup>2</sup></span> the majority of our cohort had myeloid neoplasms (MDS or AML) with a median age of 41 years. These discrepancies are potentially due to selection bias, as our institution is a tertiary referral cancer hospital with a predominant patient population of adults.</p><p>Both B-ALL/LBL patients in our cohort exhibited a low hypodiploid or pseudo-hyperdiploid karyotype, highlighting the association of a hypodiploid karyotype in B-ALL/LBL and alterations in <i>TP53</i>. This association is particularly notable for low hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL in children in up to 50% of whom with this karyotype are found to have LFS.<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>In our cohort, 11 (61%) patients had a history of cytotoxic exposure, and all developed MDS/AML. Only one MDS patient (case #1) had no history of cytotoxic therapy. These findings highlight the strong association between exposure to cytotoxic treatment and subsequent development of MDS/AML. These findings have clinical implications regarding the follow-up of LFS patients receiving cytotoxic therapy, given the high risk of transformation to aggressive leukemia and poor prognosis.</p><p>In summary, in this largest cohort of predominantly adult LFS patients with hematologic neoplasms, MDS and AML were most common, frequently associated with a prior non-hematologic malignancy, a history of cytotoxic exposure, complex karyotype, and poor prognosis. Missense mutation was the most observed <i>TP53</i> germline mutation, followed by frameshift mutation. Many of the myeloid neoplasms would fall into the category of neoplasms with biallelic <i>TP53</i> alterations, additionally supporting the aggressive nature of these neoplasms seen in LFS patients.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"99 12","pages":"2416-2419"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.27497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.27497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare inherited disorder associated with germline pathogenic TP53 variants. The absence of the functional gene product, p53 protein, results in failure to activate programmed cell death in the appropriate context and leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation. LFS patients present with a high incidence of various malignancies, often at young ages. In contrast to the high occurrence rate of solid tumors, hematologic neoplasms in LFS patients are relatively rare and not systemically described. A few previous studies showed that leukemias developed in about 2%–4% of LFS patients, whereas lymphomas are less frequent, seen in approximately 2% of LFS patients.1-3

This study explored the clinicopathologic spectrum of hematologic neoplasms in LFS patients. Eighteen patients with a well-established clinical diagnosis of LFS and confirmatory TP53 genetic testing as well as a hematologic neoplasm were included, spanning the time interval from 1/1/2000 through 8/5/2023. Their LFS diagnosis was further confirmed by our LFS Progeny Database and/or Clinical Cancer Genetics (CCG) team that runs the LFS program in our institution. Four previously reported patients (cases #1, 2, 6, 7 in that cohort)4 were included in this study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest cohort described to date.

The cohort included 12 (67%) women and 6 (33%) men. Their clinical history and hematologic diagnoses are presented in Table 1. All patients had a confirmed germline pathogenic variant of TP53 at MD Anderson Cancer Center and/or an outside institution, although the detailed nomenclature of TP53 germline mutation in 4 patients (cases #1, 8, 14, 18) tested at an outside institution was not available. All 18 patients had an extensive family history of malignancies (Supplementary Table 1). Seventeen (94%) patients had other malignant or pre-malignant neoplasms in additional to hematologic malignancy; 7 (39%) patients had one neoplasm and 10 (56%) patients had ≥2 neoplasms. The most common non-hematologic malignancies were breast cancer (9/18, 50%), sarcoma (8/18, 44%), and gastrointestinal tumors (5/18, 28%). The only patient without any other neoplasm (case #18) was diagnosed with B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL/LBL) at the age of 11 years and died 4 years later.

The median age at diagnosis of the first malignancy was 32 years (range, 1–54 years) and the median age at diagnosis of hematologic neoplasm was 41 years (range, 11–73 years). The initial presenting hematologic neoplasms included myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (n = 10, 56%), “de novo” acute myeloid leukemia (AML) developing in patients without a prior history of MDS or other hematologic neoplasms (n = 2, 11%), B-ALL/LBL (n = 2, 11%), plasma cell neoplasms (PCN) (n = 2, 11%), T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) (n = 1, 6%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (n = 1, 6%). Fifteen (83%) hematologic neoplasms occurred after the diagnosis of other tumors. In the remaining 3 patients, 1 T-ALL/LBL (case #5) was diagnosed with a synchronous astrocytoma, 1 B-ALL/LBL (case #7) was followed by high grade dysplasia in a gastric adenoma, and another B-ALL/LBL (case #18) was diagnosed in a 11-year-old patient without any other malignancies.

At initial presentation of hematologic neoplasm, 11 (61%) patients had a history of exposure to chemotherapy or radiation therapy (“cytotoxic exposure”) for other tumors. This exposure occurred with a median interval of 111 months (range: 3–240 months) prior to the diagnosis of the hematologic neoplasm. All these 11 patients presented with a myeloid neoplasm, including 9 MDS and 2 “de novo” AML. Among 9 MDS cases, 4 developed secondary AML with a median interval of 9.5 months (range, 3–15 months). The 7 patients without a history of cytotoxic exposure included 1 MDS, 1 T-ALL/LBL, 2 B-ALL/LBL, 1 MPN, and 2 PCN. Among this group, 1 patient (case #18) presented initially with B-ALL/LBL, was treated with chemoradiation and developed MDS 43 months later.

Cytogenetic findings from bone marrow aspirate samples are summarized in Table 1 (detailed karyotype in Supplementary Table 2). Conventional cytogenetic analysis showed a complex karyotype in all MDS (n = 10), AML (n = 2) and T-ALL/LBL (n = 1) cases. The 2 B-ALL/LBL cases had a hypodiploid (case #18) and a possible hypodiploid (case #7) karyotype, respectively. The remaining 3 cases (1 MPN and 2 PCN) showed a normal karyotype. By conventional cytogenetic analysis, chromosome 17 alterations were seen in 4 MDS, 2 B-ALL/LBL, 1 AML, and 1 T-ALL/LBL cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results were available for 10 neoplasms, showing monosomy 17 and/or loss of one TP53 allele in 6 neoplasms. Incorporating conventional cytogenetic and FISH/aCGH data, 9 patients had TP53 deletion at cytogenetic level (monosomy 17 or loss of TP53 signal).

Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) data from bone marrow aspirate samples were available for 17 cases (Table 1). Three patients showed an additional somatic TP53 mutation besides the germline TP53 mutation (cases #4, 9, 10). Of the 14 patients with detailed information on germline TP53 variants, 10 (71%) germline mutations occurred in the DNA binding domain (exons 5–8), including 2 in exon 5, 2 in exon 6, 5 in exon 7, and 1 in exon 8. The remaining 4 germline mutations included 3 in exon 4 and 1 involving exons 10 and 11. Missense mutations were most common (n = 10, 71%), followed by frameshift (n = 3, 21%) and nonsense (n = 1, 7%). Among the missense mutations, TP53 p.R248Q was most common, detected in 3 patients (cases #3, 15, 17). Of the 4 patients without a detailed germline TP53 mutational profile, 3 (cases #1, 8, 14) had a TP53 mutation (possibly germline) detected by NGS. The remaining 1 case (#18) did not have material to perform the analysis.

In the newly published WHO and ICC classifications of myeloid neoplasms, great emphasis was placed on TP53 status, with a separate category of MDS/AML proposed to include cases with biallelic alterations of TP53. Integrating cytogenetic and molecular data, 14 cases in this cohort demonstrated a presumed biallelic TP53 alteration (Table 1) based on a high variant allele frequency of the mutant TP53 (cases #3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15), two separate TP53 mutations (cases #4, 9, 10), or a TP53 mutation paired with a cytogenetic alteration involving the TP53 locus at chromosome 17p (cases #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, and 16). In the remaining 4 cases, 3 did not have FISH study performed for evaluation of TP53 deletion status, thus their biallelic TP53 status is uncertain. The remaining one case (#17) showed no TP53 deletion by FISH, arguing against biallelic TP53 alteration.

The treatment regimens and survival data for the hematologic neoplasms are summarized in Supplementary Table 3. Nine patients underwent stem cell transplant (SCT), including 5 MDS, 1 AML, 2 B-ALL/LBL, and 1 T-ALL/LBL. At the time of last clinical follow up, 9 (50%) patients died, including 5 MDS, 2 AML, 1 T-ALL/LBL, and 1 B-ALL/LBL. The median overall survival (OS) time from the diagnosis of the first malignancy was 198.0 months and the median OS from the diagnosis of the hematologic neoplasm was 28.8 months. To explore the prognosis of patients with MDS or AML, we compared the OS of these patients with TCGA cohort of AML patients stratified by using the European LeukemiaNet standardized system for cytogenetic risk.5 Only patients younger than 55 years were included to achieve a group of similar median age to this cohort. The analyses showed that the MDS/AML patients in this cohort showed a poorer OS than the TCGA AML patients with favorable cytogenetic risk (median, 19.7 months vs. not reached, p = .0002) and a similar OS to TCGA AML patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk (median, 19.7 vs. 27.0 months, p = .89) and those with unfavorable cytogenetic risk (median, 19.7 vs. 12.2 months, p = .60).

In contrast to previous studies which showed that hematologic neoplasms in LFS patients mainly occurred in children with B-ALL/LBL being the most common,2 the majority of our cohort had myeloid neoplasms (MDS or AML) with a median age of 41 years. These discrepancies are potentially due to selection bias, as our institution is a tertiary referral cancer hospital with a predominant patient population of adults.

Both B-ALL/LBL patients in our cohort exhibited a low hypodiploid or pseudo-hyperdiploid karyotype, highlighting the association of a hypodiploid karyotype in B-ALL/LBL and alterations in TP53. This association is particularly notable for low hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL in children in up to 50% of whom with this karyotype are found to have LFS.6

In our cohort, 11 (61%) patients had a history of cytotoxic exposure, and all developed MDS/AML. Only one MDS patient (case #1) had no history of cytotoxic therapy. These findings highlight the strong association between exposure to cytotoxic treatment and subsequent development of MDS/AML. These findings have clinical implications regarding the follow-up of LFS patients receiving cytotoxic therapy, given the high risk of transformation to aggressive leukemia and poor prognosis.

In summary, in this largest cohort of predominantly adult LFS patients with hematologic neoplasms, MDS and AML were most common, frequently associated with a prior non-hematologic malignancy, a history of cytotoxic exposure, complex karyotype, and poor prognosis. Missense mutation was the most observed TP53 germline mutation, followed by frameshift mutation. Many of the myeloid neoplasms would fall into the category of neoplasms with biallelic TP53 alterations, additionally supporting the aggressive nature of these neoplasms seen in LFS patients.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Not applicable.

李-弗劳米尼综合征患者的血液肿瘤谱。
Li-Fraumeni 综合征(LFS)是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,与种系致病性 TP53 变异有关。功能基因产物 p53 蛋白的缺失会导致无法在适当的情况下激活细胞程序性死亡,从而导致细胞增殖失控。LFS 患者各种恶性肿瘤的发病率很高,而且通常年龄较轻。与实体瘤的高发病率形成鲜明对比的是,LFS 患者中的血液肿瘤相对罕见,也没有系统的描述。之前的一些研究显示,约有 2%-4% 的 LFS 患者罹患白血病,而淋巴瘤的发病率较低,约占 LFS 患者的 2%。研究纳入了 18 例临床诊断明确为 LFS、TP53 基因检测确诊以及血液肿瘤的患者,时间跨度为 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 8 日。他们的 LFS 诊断由本机构的 LFS 后代数据库和/或负责 LFS 项目的临床癌症遗传学(CCG)团队进一步确认。本研究纳入了四例之前报道过的患者(该队列中的 1 号、2 号、6 号和 7 号病例)4。据我们所知,这是迄今为止描述的规模最大的队列。该队列包括 12 名女性(67%)和 6 名男性(33%)。他们的临床病史和血液学诊断见表 1。所有患者均在 MD 安德森癌症中心和/或外部机构确诊为 TP53 种系致病变异,但 4 例患者(病例 #1、8、14、18)在外部机构检测的 TP53 种系突变的详细命名不详。所有 18 名患者都有广泛的恶性肿瘤家族史(补充表 1)。17名患者(94%)除血液系统恶性肿瘤外,还患有其他恶性肿瘤或恶性肿瘤前期;7名患者(39%)只患有一种肿瘤,10名患者(56%)≥两种肿瘤。最常见的非血液恶性肿瘤是乳腺癌(9/18,50%)、肉瘤(8/18,44%)和胃肠道肿瘤(5/18,28%)。唯一一名没有其他肿瘤的患者(18 号病例)在 11 岁时被诊断为 B 淋巴细胞白血病/淋巴瘤(B-ALL/LBL),4 年后死亡。最初出现的血液肿瘤包括骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)(n = 10,56%)、"新发 "急性髓性白血病(AML),患者既往无 MDS 或其他血液肿瘤病史(n = 2、11%)、B-ALL/LBL(n = 2,11%)、浆细胞肿瘤(PCN)(n = 2,11%)、T淋巴细胞白血病/淋巴瘤(T-ALL/LBL)(n = 1,6%)和骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)(n = 1,6%)。15例(83%)血液肿瘤是在确诊其他肿瘤后发生的。在其余3例患者中,1例T-ALL/LBL(病例5号)被诊断为同步星形细胞瘤,1例B-ALL/LBL(病例7号)被诊断为胃腺瘤高度发育不良,另1例B-ALL/LBL(病例18号)被诊断为11岁的无其他恶性肿瘤患者。11例(61%)患者在最初出现血液肿瘤时,曾因其他肿瘤接受过化疗或放疗("细胞毒性暴露")。这种接触发生在血液肿瘤确诊之前,中位间隔为 111 个月(范围:3-240 个月)。这 11 名患者均患有骨髓性肿瘤,其中包括 9 例 MDS 和 2 例 "新发 "急性髓细胞性白血病。在 9 例 MDS 中,4 例继发 AML,中位间隔为 9.5 个月(3-15 个月)。无细胞毒接触史的 7 例患者包括 1 例 MDS、1 例 T-ALL/LBL、2 例 B-ALL/LBL、1 例 MPN 和 2 例 PCN。表 1 总结了骨髓穿刺样本的细胞遗传学结果(详细核型见补充表 2)。常规细胞遗传学分析显示,所有MDS病例(10例)、AML病例(2例)和T-ALL/LBL病例(1例)均为复杂核型。2例B-ALL/LBL病例的核型分别为低二倍体(18号病例)和可能的低二倍体(7号病例)。其余 3 个病例(1 个 MPN 和 2 个 PCN)的核型正常。通过常规细胞遗传学分析,4 例 MDS、2 例 B-ALL/LBL、1 例 AML 和 1 例 T-ALL/LBL 病例的 17 号染色体发生了改变。10例肿瘤的荧光原位杂交(FISH)或基于芯片的比较基因组杂交(aCGH)结果显示,6例肿瘤存在17单体和/或一个TP53等位基因缺失。结合传统细胞遗传学和FISH/aCGH数据,9名患者在细胞遗传学水平上存在TP53缺失(17单体或TP53信号缺失)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信