Effect of the Communities That HEAL Intervention on Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution: A Cluster-Randomized, Wait-List Controlled Trial.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Patricia R Freeman, Alexander Y Walley, T John Winhusen, Emmanuel A Oga, Jennifer Villani, Timothy Hunt, Redonna K Chandler, Douglas R Oyler, Brittni Reilly, Kitty Gelberg, Christian Douglas, Michael S Lyons, JaNae Holloway, Nathan A Vandergrift, Joella W Adams, Katherine Asman, Trevor J Baker, Candace J Brancato, Debbie M Cheng, Janet E Childerhose, James L David, Daniel J Feaster, Louisa Gilbert, LaShawn M Glasgow, Dawn A Goddard-Eckrich, Charles Knott, Hannah K Knudsen, Michelle R Lofwall, Katherine R Marks, Jason T McMullan, Carrie B Oser, Monica F Roberts, Abigail B Shoben, Michael D Stein, Scott T Walters, Josie Watson, Gary A Zarkin, Rebecca D Jackson, Jeffrey H Samet, Sharon L Walsh, Nabila El Bassel
{"title":"Effect of the Communities That HEAL Intervention on Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution: A Cluster-Randomized, Wait-List Controlled Trial.","authors":"Patricia R Freeman, Alexander Y Walley, T John Winhusen, Emmanuel A Oga, Jennifer Villani, Timothy Hunt, Redonna K Chandler, Douglas R Oyler, Brittni Reilly, Kitty Gelberg, Christian Douglas, Michael S Lyons, JaNae Holloway, Nathan A Vandergrift, Joella W Adams, Katherine Asman, Trevor J Baker, Candace J Brancato, Debbie M Cheng, Janet E Childerhose, James L David, Daniel J Feaster, Louisa Gilbert, LaShawn M Glasgow, Dawn A Goddard-Eckrich, Charles Knott, Hannah K Knudsen, Michelle R Lofwall, Katherine R Marks, Jason T McMullan, Carrie B Oser, Monica F Roberts, Abigail B Shoben, Michael D Stein, Scott T Walters, Josie Watson, Gary A Zarkin, Rebecca D Jackson, Jeffrey H Samet, Sharon L Walsh, Nabila El Bassel","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2024.307845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> To determine whether the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention is effective in increasing naloxone distribution compared with usual care. <b>Methods.</b> The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-Term) Communities Study (HCS) is a cluster-randomized, parallel-arm, wait-list controlled implementation science trial testing the impact of the CTH intervention on increasing the use of evidence-based practices to lower opioid-related overdose deaths. Communities (n = 67) highly impacted by opioid overdose in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio were allocated to CTH intervention (n = 34) or wait-list comparison (usual care; n = 33) arms. The primary outcome for this study was the number of naloxone units distributed in HCS communities during the comparison period (July 1, 2021‒June 30, 2022), examined using an intent-to-treat negative binomial regression model. <b>Results.</b> Naloxone distribution was 79% higher in the CTH intervention versus usual care arm (adjusted relative rate = 1.79; 95% confidence interval = 1.28, 2.51; <i>P</i> = .001; adjusted rates of naloxone distribution 3378 vs 1884 naloxone units per 100 000 residents), when controlling for urban‒rural status, state, baseline opioid-related overdose death rate, and baseline naloxone distribution rate. <b>Conclusions.</b> The CTH intervention increased naloxone distribution compared with usual care in communities highly impacted by the opioid crisis. <b>Trial Registration.</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04111939. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. Published online ahead of print October 10, 2024:e1-e12. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307845).</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"e1-e12"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307845","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention is effective in increasing naloxone distribution compared with usual care. Methods. The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-Term) Communities Study (HCS) is a cluster-randomized, parallel-arm, wait-list controlled implementation science trial testing the impact of the CTH intervention on increasing the use of evidence-based practices to lower opioid-related overdose deaths. Communities (n = 67) highly impacted by opioid overdose in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio were allocated to CTH intervention (n = 34) or wait-list comparison (usual care; n = 33) arms. The primary outcome for this study was the number of naloxone units distributed in HCS communities during the comparison period (July 1, 2021‒June 30, 2022), examined using an intent-to-treat negative binomial regression model. Results. Naloxone distribution was 79% higher in the CTH intervention versus usual care arm (adjusted relative rate = 1.79; 95% confidence interval = 1.28, 2.51; P = .001; adjusted rates of naloxone distribution 3378 vs 1884 naloxone units per 100 000 residents), when controlling for urban‒rural status, state, baseline opioid-related overdose death rate, and baseline naloxone distribution rate. Conclusions. The CTH intervention increased naloxone distribution compared with usual care in communities highly impacted by the opioid crisis. Trial Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04111939. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print October 10, 2024:e1-e12. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307845).

社区 HEAL 干预对用药过量教育和纳洛酮发放的影响:分组随机、候补名单对照试验。
目的确定与常规护理相比,Communities That HEAL (CTH) 干预疗法是否能有效增加纳洛酮的分发量。方法。HEALing(长期帮助戒毒)社区研究(HCS)是一项分组随机、平行臂、候补名单对照的实施科学试验,旨在测试 CTH 干预对增加循证实践的使用以降低阿片类药物相关过量死亡的影响。肯塔基州、马萨诸塞州、纽约州和俄亥俄州受阿片类药物过量影响较大的社区(n = 67)被分配到 CTH 干预(n = 34)或等待名单对比(常规护理;n = 33)组。本研究的主要结果是在比较期内(2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日)在家庭护理服务社区分发纳洛酮的数量,采用意向治疗负二项回归模型进行检验。结果显示在控制城乡状况、州、阿片类药物相关过量死亡基线率和纳洛酮分发基线率的情况下,CTH干预组的纳洛酮分发量比常规护理组高79%(调整后的相对比率=1.79;95%置信区间=1.28,2.51;P=0.001;调整后的纳洛酮分发率为每10万居民3378单位纳洛酮vs1884单位纳洛酮)。结论在受阿片类药物危机影响较大的社区,与常规护理相比,CTH干预措施增加了纳洛酮的分发量。试验注册。ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT04111939。(Am J Public Health.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307845).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信