Robust Predictive Performance of the SALT-M Score for Clinical Outcomes in Asian Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kunhee Kim, Seung Hyuk Yim, Jae Geun Lee, Dong Jin Joo, Myoung Soo Kim, Jun Yong Park, Sang Hoon Ahn, Deok-Gie Kim, Hye Won Lee
{"title":"Robust Predictive Performance of the SALT-M Score for Clinical Outcomes in Asian Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.","authors":"Kunhee Kim, Seung Hyuk Yim, Jae Geun Lee, Dong Jin Joo, Myoung Soo Kim, Jun Yong Park, Sang Hoon Ahn, Deok-Gie Kim, Hye Won Lee","doi":"10.1111/apt.18335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome of patients with chronic liver disease presenting with multiple organ failures. Recently, Sundaram-ACLF-LT Mortality (SALT-M) score has been developed to predict 1-year post-liver transplantation mortality. We validated the SALT-M score in a large-volume, Asian single-centre cohort.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We validated the SALT-M score in a large-volume, Asian single-centre cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 224 patients of ACLF grade 2-3. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and concordance index (c-index) were used to assess and compare the predictability of posttransplant mortality of SALT-M and other scores. Moreover, we compared the survivals of patients with high and low SALT-M, in conjunction with MELD score and ACLF grade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUROC for prediction of 1-year post-LT survival was higher in SALT-M (0.691) than in MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0 and delta-MELD. Similarly, the c-index of the SALT-M (0.650) was higher than aforementioned MELD systems. When categorised by the cut-off of SALT-M ≥ 20 and MELD ≥ 30, patients with high SALT-M exhibited lower post-LT survival than those with low SALT-M scores regardless of high or low MELD (40.0% for high SALT-M/high MELD vs. 42.9% for high SALT-M/low MELD vs. 73.8% for low SALT-M/high MELD vs. 63.7% for low SALT-M/low MELD, p < 0.001). In patients with ACLF grade 3, SALT-M effectively stratified the posttransplant mortality (39.4% for high SALT-M vs. 63.1% for low SALT-M, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SALT-M outperformed previous MELD systems for predicting posttransplant mortality in Asian LT cohort with severe ACLF. Transplantability for patients with severe ACLF could be determined based on SALT-M.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18335","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome of patients with chronic liver disease presenting with multiple organ failures. Recently, Sundaram-ACLF-LT Mortality (SALT-M) score has been developed to predict 1-year post-liver transplantation mortality. We validated the SALT-M score in a large-volume, Asian single-centre cohort.

Aims: We validated the SALT-M score in a large-volume, Asian single-centre cohort.

Methods: We analysed 224 patients of ACLF grade 2-3. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and concordance index (c-index) were used to assess and compare the predictability of posttransplant mortality of SALT-M and other scores. Moreover, we compared the survivals of patients with high and low SALT-M, in conjunction with MELD score and ACLF grade.

Results: The AUROC for prediction of 1-year post-LT survival was higher in SALT-M (0.691) than in MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0 and delta-MELD. Similarly, the c-index of the SALT-M (0.650) was higher than aforementioned MELD systems. When categorised by the cut-off of SALT-M ≥ 20 and MELD ≥ 30, patients with high SALT-M exhibited lower post-LT survival than those with low SALT-M scores regardless of high or low MELD (40.0% for high SALT-M/high MELD vs. 42.9% for high SALT-M/low MELD vs. 73.8% for low SALT-M/high MELD vs. 63.7% for low SALT-M/low MELD, p < 0.001). In patients with ACLF grade 3, SALT-M effectively stratified the posttransplant mortality (39.4% for high SALT-M vs. 63.1% for low SALT-M, p = 0.018).

Conclusions: SALT-M outperformed previous MELD systems for predicting posttransplant mortality in Asian LT cohort with severe ACLF. Transplantability for patients with severe ACLF could be determined based on SALT-M.

SALT-M 评分对亚洲急性-慢性肝衰竭患者临床结局的可靠预测性能。
背景:急性慢性肝功能衰竭(ACLF)是慢性肝病患者出现多器官功能衰竭的一种综合征。最近,Sundaram-ACLF-LT死亡率(SALT-M)评分被用来预测肝移植后1年的死亡率。目的:我们在一个大样本的亚洲单中心队列中验证了 SALT-M 评分:我们分析了 224 名 ACLF 2-3 级患者。方法:我们分析了224例2-3级前交叉韧带损伤患者,采用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和一致性指数(c-index)来评估和比较SALT-M评分和其他评分对移植后死亡率的预测能力。此外,我们还结合 MELD 评分和 ACLF 分级,比较了 SALT-M 高分和低分患者的存活率:结果:SALT-M 预测 LT 术后 1 年生存率的 AUROC(0.691)高于 MELD、MELD-Na、MELD 3.0 和 delta-MELD。同样,SALT-M 的 c 指数(0.650)也高于上述 MELD 系统。以 SALT-M ≥ 20 和 MELD ≥ 30 为临界值进行分类时,无论 MELD 高低,SALT-M 高分患者的 LT 后生存率均低于 SALT-M 低分患者(SALT-M 高分/MELD 高分为 40.0% vs. SALT-M 高分/MELD 低分为 42.9% vs. SALT-M 低分/MELD 高分为 73.8% vs. SALT-M 低分/MELD 低分为 63.7%,p):在预测重度 ACLF 亚洲 LT 患者移植后死亡率方面,SALT-M 优于之前的 MELD 系统。根据 SALT-M 可以确定重度 ACLF 患者的移植可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信